Erratum: Dressage, control, and enterprise systems: The case of NASA's Full Cost initiative (European Journal of Information Systems (2010) 19 (377) doi:10.1057/ejis.2009.47);Dressage, control, and enterprise systems: The case of NASA's Full Cost initiative

European Journal of Information Systems

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 21-34

  Berente, Nicholas ^a   Gal, Uri ^a   Yoo, Youngjin ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Demonstrative control; Depositif; Dressage; ERP; NASA

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949697743     PISSN: 0960085X     EISSN: 14769344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2010.27     Document Type: Erratum

References (60)

1. ALLEN KA, COLLIGAN D, FINNIE A and KERN T (2000) Trust, power and interorganizational information systems: the case of the electronic trading community translease. Information Systems Journal 10(1), 21.
2. ASH GG and BURN JM (2003) A strategic framework for the management of ERP enabled e-business change. European Journal of Operational Research 146(2), 374.
3. AVGEROU C andMCGRATH K (2007) Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change. MIS Quarterly 31(2), 295.
4. BACKHOUSE J, HSU CW and SILVA L (2006) Circuits of power in creating de jure standards: shaping an international information systems security standard. MIS Quarterly 30(1), 413.
5. BOLAND RJ (2005) Interpretation and theory in qualitative research. In The Art of Science (TENGBLAD S, SOLLI R and CZARNIAWSKA B, Eds) Copenhagen Business School Press, Malmö, Liber.
6. BOWKER GC (2005) Memory Practices in the Sciences. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. BROWN JS and DUGUID P (2000) The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. CLEGG SR, COURPASSON D and PHILLIPS N (2006) Power and Organizations. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
9. CIBORRA C (2000) From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. CIBORRA C (2002) The Labyrinths of Information: Challenging the Wisdom of Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. COURTEY P and MARSCHKE G (2004) An empirical investigation of gaming responses to performance incentives. Journal of Labor Economics 22(1), 23.
12. DAVENPORT T (1998) Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. Harvard Business Review 76(4), 121.
13. DAVENPORT TH, HARRIS JG and CANTRELL S (2004) Enterprise systems and ongoing process change. Business Process Management Journal 10(1), 16.
14. DAVIDSON EJ (2002) Technology frames and framing: a socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly 26(4), 329.
15. DOOLIN B (2004) Power and resistance in the implementation of a medical management information system. Information Systems Journal 14(4), 343.
16. EISENHARDT KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review 14(4), 532.
17. EISENHARDT KM and GRAEBNER ME (2007) Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal 50(1), 25.
18. ELMES M, STRONG D and VOLKOFF O (2005) Panoptic empowerment and reflexive conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations. Information and Organization 15(1), 1.
19. FOUCAULT M (1977) Discipline and Punish - The Birth of the Prison Translated by ALAN S, Pantheon Books, New York.
20. FRIESWICK K (2004) NASA we have a problem, can Gwendolyn Brown fix the space agency's chronic financial woes. CFO Magazine, 1 May 2004.
21. GAO (2003) United States government accountability office, major management challenges and program risks: national aeronautics and space administration. Performance and Accountability Series, January.
22. GAO (2004) United States Government Accountability Office, NASA: Compliance with cost limits. Letter to U.S. Congressional Committee on Science, 10 April.
23. GAO (2005) United States Government Accountability Office, NASA: Compliance with cost limits. Letter to U.S. Congressional Committee on Science, 8 April.
24. GATTIKER TF and GOODHUE DL (2005) What happens after ERP implementation: understanding the impact of interdependence and differentiation on plant-level outcomes. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 559.
25. GOSAIN S (2004) Enterprise information systems as objects and carriers of institutional forces: the new iron cage? Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(4), 151.
26. GRAY PH (2001) The impact of knowledge repositories on power and control in the workplace. Information Technology and People 14(4), 368.
27. HANSETH O and MONTEIRO E (1997) Inscribing behaviour in information infrastructures standards. Accounting, Management, and Information Technology 7(4), 183.
28. HOWARD-GRENVILLE JA and CARLILE PR (2006) The incompatibility of knowledge regimes: consequences of the material world for crossdomain work. European Journal of Information Systems 15(5), 473.
29. HOWCROFT D and LIGHT B (2006) Reflections on issues of power in packaged software selection. Information Systems Journal 16(3), 215.
30. INTRONA L (1997) Management, Information, and Power: A Narrative of the Involved Manager. MacMillan, London.
31. JACKSON N and CARTER P (1998) Labour as dressage. In Managing Foucault: Management and Organization Theory (MCKINLAY A and STARKEY K, Eds) Sage Publications, London.
32. JASPERSON J, CARTE TA, SAUNDERS CS, BUTLER BS, CROES HJP and ZHENG W (2002) Review: power and information technology research: a metatriangulation review. MIS Quarterly 26(4), 397.
33. KALLINIKOS J (2004) Deconstructing information packages: organizational and behavioral implications of enterprise systems. Information Technology and People 17(1), 8.
34. KLING R and SCACCHI W (1980) Computing as social action: the social dynamics of computing in complex organizations. Advances in Computers 19, 249.
35. LAWRENCE PR and LORSCH JW (1967) Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. LIN A and SILVA L (2005) The social and political construction of technological frames. European Journal of Information Systems 14(1), 49.
37. MALONE T and CROWSON K (1994) The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1), 87.
38. MARAKAS GM and HORNIK S (1996) Passive resistance misuse: overt support and covert recalcitrance in IS implementation. European Journal of Information Systems 5, 208.
39. MARCH J and OLSEN J (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Universitetsforlaget, Bergen, Norway.
40. MARKUS ML (1983) Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Communications of the ACM 26(6), 430.
41. MARKUS ML and BJORN-ANDERSEN N (1987) Power over users: its exercise by system professionals. Communications of the ACM 30(6), 498.
42. MARKUS ML, AXLINE S, PETRIE D and TANIS C (2000) Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved. Journal of Information Technology 15(4), 245-265.
43. MILES MB and HUBERMAN AM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
44. MLCKOVA A andWHITLEY EA (2004) Configuring peer-to-peer software: an empirical study of how users react to the regulatory features of software. European Journal of Information Systems 13(2), 95.
45. PARNAS DL and CLEMENTS PC (1986) A rational design process: how and why to fake it. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 12(2), 251.
46. ROBEY D and SMITH LA (1993) Perceptions of conflict and success in information systems development projects. Journal of Management Information Systems 10(1), 123.
47. ROBEY D, ROSS J and BOUDREAU MC (2002) Learning to implement enterprise systems: an exploratory study of the dialectics of change. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(1), 17.
48. SAMBAMURTHY V, BHARADWAJ A and GROVER V (2003) Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly 27(2), 237.
49. SCOTT SV and WAGNER EL (2003) Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration. Information and Organization 13(4), 285.
50. SIA SK, TANG M, SOH C and BOH WF (2002) Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems as a technology of power: empowerment or panoptic control? The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 33(1), 23-37.
51. SOH C and SIA SK (2004) An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package - organization misalignments. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13(4), 375.
52. SILVA L (2007) Epistemological and theoretical challenges for studying power and politics in information systems. Information Systems Journal 17(2), 165.
53. SILVA L and BACKHOUSE J (2003) The circuits-of-power framework for studying power in institutionalization of information systems. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4(1), 294.
54. STEFANOU CJ (2001) A framework for the ex-ante evaluation of ERP software. European Journal of Information Systems 10(4), 204.
55. STRAUSS AL and CORBIN JM (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. SAGE Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA.
56. VOLKOFF O, STRONG DM and ELMES MB (2005) Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration. European Journal of Information Systems 14(2), 110.
57. WEI HL, WANG ETG and JU PH (2005) Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis. European Journal of Information Systems 14(4), 324.
58. WEILL P, SUBRAMANI M and BROADBENT M (2002) Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. Sloan Management Review 44(1), 57.
59. YIN RK (2003) Case Study Research Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
60. ZUBOFF S (1988) In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. Basic Books, Inc, New York.