The osmotic tolerance of boar spermatozoa and its usefulness as sperm quality parameter

Animal Reproduction Science

Volumn 119, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 265-274

  Yeste, Marc ^a   Briz, Mailo ^a   Pinart, Elisabeth ^a   Sancho, Sílvia ^a   Bussalleu, Eva ^a   Bonet, Sergi ^a  

^a Biotechnology of Animal and Human Reproduction   (Spain)

Author keywords

Boar; Litter size; Non return rates; Osmotic tolerance; Sperm quality

Indexed keywords

HYPERTONIC SOLUTION; HYPOTONIC SOLUTION;

ACROSOME; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CELL SURVIVAL; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; FERTILITY; MALE; OSMOLARITY; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHYSIOLOGY; SPERMATOZOON; SPERMATOZOON MOTILITY; SWINE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACROSOME; ANIMALS; CELL SURVIVAL; FERTILITY; HYPERTONIC SOLUTIONS; HYPOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MALE; OSMOLAR CONCENTRATION; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; SPERM MOTILITY; SPERMATOZOA; SWINE;

SUIDAE; SUS;

EID: 77949658806     PISSN: 03784320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adi H., and Williams L.J. Jackknife. In: Salkind N. (Ed). Encyclopedia of Research Design (2009), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
2. Agca Y., Gilmore J., Byers M., Woods E.J., Liu J., and Critser J.K. Osmotic characteristics of mouse spermatozoa in the presence of extenders and sugars. Biol. Reprod. 67 (2002) 1493-1501
3. Alm K., Peltoniemi O.A.T., Koskinen E., and Andersson M. Porcine field fertility with two different insemination doses and the effect of sperm morphology. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 41 (2006) 210-213
4. Berger T., Anderson D.L., and Penedo M.C.T. Porcine sperm fertilizing potential in relationship to sperm functional capacities. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 44 (1996) 231-239
5. Braundmeier A.G., and Miller J. The search is on: finding accurate molecular markers of male fertility. J. Dairy Sci. 84 (2001) 1915-1925
6. Bussalleu E., Pinart E., Yeste M., Briz M.D., Sancho S., Garcia-Gil N., Badia E., Bassols J., Pruneda A., Casas I., and Bonet S. Development for a protocol for multiple staining with fluorochromes to assess the functional status of boar spermatozoa. Microsc. Res. Technol. 68 (2005) 227-233
7. Caiza de la Cueva F.I., Pujol M.R., Rigau T., Bonet S., Miró J., Briz M., and Rodríguez-Gil J.E. Resistance to osmotic stress of horse spermatozoa: the role of ionic pumps and their relationship to cryopreservation success. Theriogenology 48 (1997) 947-968
8. Caiza de la Cueva F.I., Rigau T., Pujol R., Piedrafita J., and Rodríguez-Gil J.E. Resistance to hyperosmotic stress in boar spermatozoa: the role of the ionic pumps and the relationship with cryosurvival. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 48 (1997) 301-315
9. Chan S.Y., Pearlstone A., Uhler M., Tucker M., Greenspon R., Leung A., and Wang C. Human spermatozoal tail hypo-osmotic swelling test, motility characteristics in hypotonic saline, and survival of spermatozoa after cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod. 8 (1993) 717-721
10. Chantler E., and Abraham-Peskir J.V. Significance of midpiece vesicles and functional integrity of the membranes of human spermatozoa after osmotic stress. Andrologia 36 (2004) 87-93
11. Christensen P., Knudsen D.B., Wachmann H., and Madsen M.T. Quality control in boar semen production and correlation to field fertility. Theriogenology 62 (2004) 1218-1228
12. Christensen P., Boelling D., Pedersen K.M., Korsgaard I.R., and Jensen J. Relationship between sperm viability as determined by flow cytometry and non-return rate of dairy bulls. J. Androl. 26 (2005) 98-106
13. Colenbrander B., Gadella B.M., and Stout T.A.E. The predictive value of semen analysis in the evaluation of stallion fertility. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 38 (2003) 305-311
14. Collins E.D., Flowers W.L., Shanks R.D., and Miller D.J. Porcine sperm zona ability as an indicator of fertility. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 104 (2008) 69-82
15. Den Daas J.H.G., De Jong G., Lansbergen L.M.T.E., and Van Wagtendonk-De Leew A.M. The relationship between the number of spermatozoa inseminated and the reproductive efficiency of individual dairy bulls. J. Dairy Sci. 81 (1998) 1714-1723
16. Fraser L., Gorszczaruk K., and Strzeżek J. Relationship between motility and membrane integrity of boar spermatozoa in media varying in osmolality. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 36 (2001) 325-329
17. Gadea J., and Matás C. Sperm factors related to in vitro penetration of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 54 (2001) 1343-1357
18. Gadea J. Sperm factors related to in vitro and in vivo porcine fertility. Theriogenology 63 (2005) 431-444
19. Gilmore J.A., Du J., Tao J., Peter A.T., and Critser J.K. Osmotic properties of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. J. Reprod. Fertil. 107 (1996) 87-95
20. Gilmore J.A., Liu J., Peter A.T., and Critser J.K. Determination of plasma membrane characteristics of boar spermatozoa and their relevance to cryopreservation. Biol. Reprod. 58 (1998) 28-36
21. Guthrie H.D., Liu J., and Critser J.K. Osmotic tolerance limits and effects of cryoprotectants on motility of bovine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 67 (2002) 1811-1816
22. Holt C., Holt W.V., Moore H.D.M., Red H.C.B., and Curnock R.M. Objectively measured boar sperm motility parameters correlate with the outcomes of on-farm inseminations: results of two fertility trials. J. Androl. 18 (1997) 312-323
23. Jeyendran R.S., Van der Ven H.H., Pérez-Peláez M., Crabo B.G., and Zaneveld L.J. Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics. J. Reprod. Fertil. 70 (1984) 219-228
24. Juonala T., Salonen E., Nurttila T., and Andersson M. Three fluorescence methods for assessing boar semen viability. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 34 (1999) 83-87
25. Koshimoto C., and Mazur P. The effect of the osmolality of sugar-containing media, the type of sugar, and the mass and molar concentration of sugar on the survival of frozen-thawed mouse sperm. Cryobiology 45 (2002) 80-90
26. Kott P.S. The delete-a-group Jackknife. J. Off. Stat. 17 (2001) 521-526
27. Lechniak D., Kedzierski A., and Stanislawski D. The use of HOS test to evaluate membrane functionality of boar sperm capacitation in vitro. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 37 (2002) 379-380
28. Nascimento J.F.K., Nascimento E.F., and Melo M.I.V. Modification of the short osmotic resistance test for evaluating the functional integrity of boar spermatozoa. Arq. Bras. Med. Vet. Zootec. 53 (1999) 393-395
29. Pérez-Llano B., Lorenzo J.J., Yenes P., and García-Casado P. A short hypoosmotic swelling test for the prediction of boar sperm fertility. Theriogenology 56 (2001) 387-398
30. Pérez-Llano B., Yenes-García P., and García-Casado P. Four subpopulations of boar spermatozoa defined according to their response to the short hypoosmotic swelling test and acrosome status during incubation at 37 °C. Theriogenology 60 (2003) 1401-1407
31. Petrunkina A.M., Petzoldt R., Stahlberg S., Pfeilsticker J., Beyerbach M., Bader H., and Töpfer-Petersen E. Sperm-cell volumetric measurements as parameters in bull semen function evaluation: correlation with non-return rate. Andrologia 33 (2001) 360-367
32. Petrunkina A.M., Harrison R.A., Hebel M., Weitze K.F., and Töpfer-Petersen E. Role of quinine-sensitive ion channels in volume regulation in boar and bull spermatozoa. Reproduction 122 (2001) 327-336
33. Pommer A.C., Rutllant J., and Meyers S.A. The role of osmotic resistance on equine spermatozoal function. Theriogenology 58 (2002) 1373-1384
34. Pukazhenthi B., Noiles E., Pelican K., Donoghue A., Wildt D., and Howard J. Osmotic effects on feline spermatozoa from normospermic versus teratospermic donors. Cryobiology 40 (2000) 139-150
35. Rigau T., Farre M., Ballester J., Mogas T., Peña A., and Rodríguez-Gil J.E. Effects of glucose and fructose on motility patterns of dog spermatozoa from fresh ejaculates. Theriogenology 56 (2001) 801-815
36. Rigau T., Rivera M.M., Palomo M.J., Fernández-Novell J.M., Mogas T., Ballester J., Peña A., Otaegui P.J., Guinovart J.J., and Rodríguez-Gil J.E. Differential effects of glucose and fructose on hexose metabolism in dog spermatozoa. Reproduction 123 (2002) 579-591
37. Rodríguez-Martínez H. Laboratory semen assessment and prediction of fertility: still utopia?. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 38 (2003) 312-318
38. Rota A., Penzo N., Vincenti L., and Mantovani R. Hypoosmotic swelling (HOS) as a screening. Theriogenology 53 (2000) 1415-1420
39. Ruiz-Sánchez A.L., O'Donoghue R., Novak S., Dyck M.K., Cosgrove J.R., Dixon W.T., and Foxcroft G.R. The predictive value of routine semen evaluation and IVF technology for determining relative boar fertility. Theriogenology 66 (2006) 736-748
40. Sutkeviciene N., Andersson M.A., Zilinskas H., and Andersson M. Assessment of boar semen quality in relation to fertility with special reference to methanol stress. Theriogenology 63 (2005) 739-747
41. Tulsiani D.R., Zeng H.T., and Abou-Haila A. Biology of sperm capacitation: evidence for multiple signalling pathways. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 63 (2007) 257-272
42. Turba M.E., Fantinati P., Bernardini C., Gentilini F., Bacci M.L., and Forni M. Relationships between innovative and traditional parameters to investigate semen quality in pigs. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 99 (2007) 72-81
43. Verstegen J., Iguer-Ouada M., and Onclin K. Computer assisted semen analyzers in andrology research and veterinary practice. Theriogenology 57 (2002) 149-179
44. WHO. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Sperm and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction. third ed. (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
45. Willoughby C.E., Mazur P., Peter A.T., and Critser J.K. Osmotic tolerance limits and properties of murine spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 55 (1996) 715-727
46. Zeng W.X., Shimada M., Isobe N., and Terada T. Survival of boar spermatozoa frozen in diluents of varying osmolality. Theriogenology 56 (2001) 447-458
47. Zou C.X., and Yang Z.M. Evaluation on sperm quality of freshly ejaculated boar semen during in vitro storage under different temperatures. Theriogenology 53 (2000) 1477-1488