Does reverse growth dominance develop in old plantations of Eucalyptus saligna?

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 259, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1815-1818

  Doi, Bui The ^a,b   Binkley, Dan ^b   Stape, José Luiz ^c  

^a VIETNAM NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF FORESTRY   (Viet Nam)

^b Colorado State University ^*  (United States)

^c NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Forest stand development; Growth dominance coefficient; Tropical plantation biomass

Indexed keywords

CUMULATIVE FREQUENCIES; FOREST STAND DEVELOPMENT; FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTIONS; GINI COEFFICIENTS; GROWTH DOMINANCE COEFFICIENT; INDIVIDUAL TREE; NEGATIVE VALUES; PINE SPECIES; RESOURCE USE; REVERSE GROWTH; SILVICULTURAL TREATMENTS; STAND DEVELOPMENT; STAND GROWTH; STEMWOODS; TROPICAL PLANTATIONS;

BIOMASS; FORESTRY;

ECOLOGY;

BIOMASS ALLOCATION; DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; DOMINANCE; EVERGREEN TREE; FERTILIZER APPLICATION; FORESTRY PRODUCTION; GROWTH RATE; MONOCULTURE; PLANTATION FORESTRY; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; RESOURCE USE; SILVICULTURE; STAND DYNAMICS; THINNING; TROPICAL FOREST; WOODY PLANT;

BIOMASS; COEFFICIENTS; DEVELOPMENT; ECOLOGY; FORESTRY; FORESTS; GROWTH; PLANTATIONS; TROPICS;

BRAZIL; HAWAII [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EUCALYPTUS; EUCALYPTUS SALIGNA;

EID: 77949657114     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.05.031     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Binkley D., Stape J.L., Ryan M.G., Barnard H., and Fownes J. Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 5 (2002) 58-67
2. Binkley D., Senock R., Bird S., and Cole T. Twenty years of stand development in pure and mixed stands of Eucalyptus saligna and nitrogen-fixing Falcataria mollucana. For. Ecol. Manage. 182 (2003) 93-102
3. Binkley D., Olsson U., Rochelle R., Stohlgren T., and Nikolov N. Structure, production and resource use in some old-growth spruce/fir forests in the Front Range of the Rocky Mountains, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 172 (2003) 271-279
4. Binkley D. A hypothesis about the interaction of tree growth dominance and stand production through stand development. For. Ecol. Manage. 190 (2004) 265-271
5. Binkley D., Stape J.L., and Ryan M.G. Thinking about efficiency of resource use in forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 193 (2004) 5-16
6. Binkley D., Kashian D.M., Boyden S., Kaye M.W., Bradford J.B., Arthur M.A., Fornwalt P.J., and Ryan M.G. Patterns of growth dominance in forests of the Rocky Mountains, USA. For. Ecol. Manage. 236 (2006) 193-201
7. Binkley D., Stape J.L., Bauerle W.L., and Ryan M.G. Explaining growth of trees and stands: changes in efficiency of light use through a rotation of Eucalyptus at four sites in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manage. 259 (2010) 1704-1713
8. Boyden S., Binkley E., and Senock R. Competition and facilitation between Eucalyptus and nitrogen-fixing Falcataria in relation to soil fertility. Ecology 86 (2005) 992-1001
9. D'Argent, N.M.J., 2006. Above ground growth and net primary productivity trends across and age sequence of mountain ash stands. Honours thesis. Monash University, Melbourne.
10. Fernandez M.E., and Gyenge J. Testing Binkley's hypothesis about the interaction of individual tree water use efficiency and growth efficiency with dominance patterns in open and close canopy stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 257 (2009) 1859-1865
11. Grierson P.F., Adams M.A., and Attiwill P.M. Estimates of carbon storate in the above-ground biomass of Victoria's forests. Aust. J. Bot. 40 (1992) 631-640
12. Harrod R.J., McRae B.H., and Hart W.E. Historical stand reconstruction in ponderosa pine forests to guide silvicultural prescriptions. For. Ecol. Manage. 114 (1999) 433-446
13. Homyack J.A., Harrison D.J., and Krohn W.B. Structural differences between precommercially thinned and unthinned conifer stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 194 (2004) 131-143
14. Hunter M.L. Wildlife, forests, and forestry (1990), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs
15. Landsberg J.J., Gower S.T., and Roy J. Applications of Physiological Ecology to Forest Management (1996), Academic Press, San Diego
16. Latham P.A., Zuuring H.R., and Coble D.W. A method for quantifying vertical forest structure. For. Ecol. Manage. 199 (1998) 157-170
17. Martin D., Beringer J., Hutley L.B., and McHugh I. Carbon cycling in a mountain ash forest: analysis of below ground respiration. Agric. For. Meteor. 147 (2007) 58-70
18. Martin T.A., and Jokela T.A. Developmental patterns and nutrition impact radiation use efficiency components in southern pine stands. Ecol. Appl. 14 (2004) 1839-1854
19. Puettmann K.J., Messier, and Coates K.D. A Critique of Sliviculture: Managing for Complexity (2008), Island Press, Washington, DC
20. Stoll P., Weiner J., Muller-Landau H., et al. Size symmetry of competition alters biomass-density relationships. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 269 (2002) 2191-2195
21. Tajchman S., Benyon R., Bren L., Kochenderfer J., and Pan C. On spatial variability of above-ground forest biomass. Biomass Bioenergy 11 (1996) 383-386
22. Waltz A.E.M., Fule P.Z., Covington W.W., and Moore M.M. Diversity in ponderosa pine forest structure following ecological restoration treatments. For. Sci. 49 (2003) 885-900
23. Weiner J., Mallory E.B., and Kennedy C. Growth and variability in crowded and uncrowded populations of dwarf marigolds (Tagetes patula). Ann. Bot. 65 (1990) 513-524
24. Weiner J., and Thomas S.C. Size variability and competition in plant monocultures. Oikos 47 (1986) 211-222
25. Youngblood A., Max T., and Coe K. Stand structure in eastside old-growth ponderosa pine forests of Oregon and northern California. For. Ecol. Manage. 199 (2004) 191-217
26. Zeide B. Thinning and growth: a full turnaround. J. For. 99 (2001) 20-25