No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: Results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups

Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 37-45

  Bjørgul, Kristian ^a,b   Novicoff, Wendy M ^a   Andersen, S T ^c   Brevig, K ^b   Thu, F ^b   Wiig, M ^d   Ahlund O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b Ostfold Hospital Trust   (Norway)

^c COXA Ortopedikonsult ^*  (Norway)

^d Fredrikshald Klinikk Mogens Wiig   (Norway)

Author keywords

Acetabulum; Cemented; Hip; Randomized; Uncemented

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT;

ACETABULAR COMPONENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP PROSTHESIS; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ACETABULUM; AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE CEMENTS; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HIP INJURIES; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIERS ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77949655544     PISSN: 15909921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10195-010-0082-2     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Richy F, Dardennes C, Reginster JY (2004) Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 86-A:963-974
2. Harris WH (2003) Results of uncemented cups: a critical appraisal at 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121-125
3. R Illgen HE Rubash 2002 The optimal fixation of the cementless acetabular component in primary total hip arthroplasty J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10 43 56 11809050
4. G Garellick P Herberts C Stromberg H Malchau 1994 Long-term results of Charnley arthroplasty. A 12-16-year follow-up study J Arthroplast 9 333 340 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90041-8 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FlsVSlsw%3D%3D (Pubitemid 24266574)
5. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:171-177
6. S Kobayashi K Takaoka N Saito K Hisa 1997 Factors affecting aseptic failure of fixation after primary Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Multivariate survival analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 79 1618 1627 1:STN:280: DyaK1c%2FksVSktA%3D%3D 9384420
7. Callaghan JJ et al (2004) Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:690-695
8. Hartofilakidis G, Karachalios T, Karachalios G (2005) The 20-year outcome of the charnley arthroplasty in younger and older patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 177-182
9. BM Wroblewski PD Siney PA Fleming 2002 Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty in patients under the age of 51 years. Follow-up to 33 years J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 540 543 10.1302/0301-620X.84B4.10293 1:STN:280: DC%2BD38zgt1yltg%3D%3D 12043775
10. SW Smith DM Estok WH Harris 1998 Total hip arthroplasty with use of second-generation cementing techniques. An eighteen-year-average follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 80 1632 1640 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlsVeltQ%3D%3D 9840632
11. Peters CL, Miller MD (2007) The cementless acetabular component. 2:946-968
12. Gaffey JL et al (2004) Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon's results following acetabular fixation with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:257-261
13. Harris WH (1995) The problem is osteolysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 46-53
14. E Garcia-Rey E Garcia-Cimbrelo 2007 Long-term results of uncemented acetabular cups with an ACS polyethylene liner. A 14-16-year follow-up study Int Orthop 31 205 210 10.1007/s00264-006-0151-6 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2s7ovVOmuw%3D%3D 16736147 (Pubitemid 46731535)
15. CJ la Valle, et al. 2009 Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports J Bone Joint Surg Am 91 1130 1135 10.2106/JBJS.H.00168 19411461
16. CA Engh RH Hopper Jr CA Engh Jr 2004 Long-term porous-coated cup survivorship using spikes, screws, and press-fitting for initial fixation J Arthroplast 19 54 60 10.1016/j.arth.2004.06.004 (Pubitemid 39349018)
17. RJ Reina JA Rodriguez VJ Rasquinha CS Ranawat 2007 Fixation and osteolysis in plasma-sprayed hemispherical cups with hybrid total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplast 22 531 534 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.008 (Pubitemid 46880183)
18. JC Clohisy WH Harris 1999 The Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation. An average ten-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 66 73 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7jslensw%3D%3D 9973056
19. GP Grobler ID Learmonth BP Bernstein BJ Dower 2005 Ten-year results of a press-fit, porous-coated acetabular component J Bone Joint Surg Br 87 786 789 10.1302/0301-620X.87B6.15335 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3mvFWjtQ%3D%3D 15911659 (Pubitemid 40862061)
20. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Wan Z (2002) Cementless hemispheric porous-coated sockets implanted with press-fit technique without screws: average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:1195-1200
21. Bojescul JA, Xenos JS, Callaghan JJ, Savory CG (2003) Results of porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty without cement at fifteen years: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1079-1083
22. AR Britton DW Murray CJ Bulstrode K McPherson RA Denham 1996 Long-term comparison of Charnley and Stanmore design total hip replacements J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 802 808 1:STN:280:DyaK28vjtlSntQ%3D%3D 8836075
23. Chandran P, Azzabi M, Miles J, Andrews M, Bradley J (2008) Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated Hip prosthesis vs the Charnley cemented Hip prosthesis. J Arthroplast
24. G Garellick H Malchau P Herberts 1999 The Charnley versus the Spectron hip prosthesis: clinical evaluation of a randomized, prospective study of 2 different hip implants J Arthroplast 14 407 413 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90095-5 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzlsFWktg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29329792)
25. LI Havelin B Espehaug LB Engesaeter 2002 The performance of two hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups compared with Charnley cups. From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register J Bone Joint Surg Br 84 839 845 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.12492 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38vlt1Sguw%3D%3D 12211674
26. Jacobsson SA, Djerf K, Wahlstrom O (1996) Twenty-year results of McKee-Farrar versus Charnley prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res S60-S68
27. Murray MP, Gore DR, Brewer BJ, Zuege RC, Gardner GM (1976) Comparison of functional performance after McKee-Farrar, Charnley, and Muller total hip replacement. A six-month follow-up of one hundred sixty-five cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 33-43
28. A Alho O Soreide AJ Bjersand 1984 Mechanical factors in loosening of Christiansen and Charnley arthroplasties Acta Orthop Scand 55 261 266 1:STN:280:DyaL2c3lt1yjtg%3D%3D 6741472
29. RA Marston AG Cobb G Bentley 1996 Stanmore compared with Charnley total hip replacement. A prospective study of 413 arthroplasties J Bone Joint Surg Br 78 178 184 1:STN:280:DyaK283gvFCnsA%3D%3D 8666620
30. I Onsten AS Carlsson A Ohlin JA Nilsson 1994 Migration of acetabular components, inserted with and without cement, in one-stage bilateral hip arthroplasty. A controlled, randomized study using roentgenstereophotogrammetric analysis J Bone Joint Surg Am 76 185 194 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7ls12hsw%3D%3D 8113252
31. J Charnley DK Halley 1975 Rate of wear in total hip replacement Clin Orthop Relat Res 112 170 179 10.1097/00003086-197510000-00021 1192630
32. K Hardinge 1982 The direct lateral approach to the hip J Bone Joint Surg Br 64 17 19 1:STN:280:DyaL387mslOgsw%3D%3D 7068713
33. VJ Rasquinha V Dua JA Rodriguez CS Ranawat 2003 Fifteen-year survivorship of a collarless, cemented, normalized femoral stem in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a modified third-generation cement technique J Arthroplast 18 86 94 10.1016/S0883-5403(03)00300-0 (Pubitemid 37259671)
34. CJ Sychterz CA Engh Jr A Yang CA Engh 1999 Analysis of temporal wear patterns of porous-coated acetabular components: distinguishing between true wear and so-called bedding-in J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 821 830 10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.9383 1:STN:280:DyaK1MzhvVCgsw%3D%3D 10391547 (Pubitemid 29438357)
35. WH Harris 1969 Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J Bone Joint Surg Am 51 737 755 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3gtlWltQ%3D%3D 5783851
36. TA Gruen GMP McNeice HC Amstutz 1979 "Modes of Failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening [Miscellaneous Article] Clin Orthop Relat Res 141 17 27 477100
37. JG DeLee J Charnley 1976 Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total Hip replacement [Report] Clin Orthop Relat Res 121 20 32 991504
38. Y Kalairajah K Azurza C Hulme S Molloy KJ Drabu 2005 Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties-a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score J Arthroplast 20 1037 1041 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.017 (Pubitemid 41820991)
39. SA Jacobsson K Djerf O Wahlstrom 1990 A comparative study between McKee-Farrar and Charnley arthroplasty with long-term follow-up periods J Arthroplast 5 9 14 10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80003-3 1:STN:280:DyaK3c3gtl2isw%3D%3D
40. PE Beaule FJ Dorey R Hoke M Leduff HC Amstutz 2006 The value of patient activity level in the outcome of total hip arthroplasty J Arthroplast 21 547 552 10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.004 (Pubitemid 43866408)
41. MB Petersen IH Poulsen J Thomsen S Solgaard 1999 The hemispherical Harris-Galante acetabular cup, inserted without cement. The results of an eight to eleven-year follow-up of one hundred and sixty-eight hips J Bone Joint Surg Am 81 219 224 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ntFGqsQ%3D%3D 10073585
42. Sarafis KA, Karatzas GD, Feroussis JC, Yotis CL (1997) Hybrid total hip replacement. A 5-10-year follow-up study of 106 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl 275:21-26
43. TP Schmalzried WH Harris 1993 Hybrid total hip replacement. A 6.5-year follow-up study J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 608 615 1:STN:280:DyaK3szit1ektg%3D%3D 8331118
44. DW Murray AR Britton CJ Bulstrode 1997 Loss to follow-up matters J Bone Joint Surg Br 79 254 257 10.1302/0301-620X.79B2.6975 1:STN:280: DyaK2s3jsVOkug%3D%3D 9119852 (Pubitemid 27135386)
45. K Imamura N Black 1998 Does comorbidity affect the outcome of surgery? Total hip replacement in the UK and Japan Int J Qual Health Care 10 113 123 10.1093/intqhc/10.2.113 1:STN:280:DyaK1czltlWqtg%3D%3D 9690884 (Pubitemid 28311151)
46. S Greenfield G Apolone BJ McNeil PD Cleary 1993 The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement Med Care 31 141 154 10.1097/00005650-199302000- 00005 1:STN:280:DyaK3s7msVOjtg%3D%3D 8433577
47. S Greenfield 1987 The state of outcomes research: are we on target? N Engl J Med 320 1142 1145
48. Keener JD et al (2003) Long-term function after Charnley total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 148-156
49. PR Fortin, et al. 1999 Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery Arthritis Rheum 42 1722 1728 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1722::AID- ANR22>3.0.CO;2-R 1:STN:280:DyaK1MznsVGguw%3D%3D 10446873 (Pubitemid 30263642)
50. DL Groll T To C Bombardier JG Wright 2005 The development of a comorbidity index with physical function as the outcome J Clin Epidemiol 58 595 602 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.10.018 15878473 (Pubitemid 40692725)
51. A Lubbeke JN Katz TV Perneger P Hoffmeyer 2007 Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity J Rheumatol 34 394 400 17143967
52. Dorey FJ, Amstutz HC (2002) The need to account for patient activity when evaluating the results of total hip arthroplasty with survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:709-710
53. JG Wright S Rudicel AR Feinstein 1994 Ask patients what they want. Evaluation of individual complaints before total hip replacement J Bone Joint Surg Br 76 229 234 1:STN:280:DyaK2c7ls12msA%3D%3D 8113282
54. GB Flugsrud L Nordsletten B Espehaug LI Havelin HE Meyer 2007 The effect of middle-age body weight and physical activity on the risk of early revision hip arthroplasty: a cohort study of 1,535 individuals Acta Orthop 78 99 107 10.1080/17453670610013493 17453400 (Pubitemid 46570265)
55. CJ Lavernia RJ Sierra DS Hungerford K Krackow 2001 Activity level and wear in total knee arthroplasty: a study of autopsy retrieved specimens J Arthroplast 16 446 453 10.1054/arth.2001.23509 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MzjsVWkug%3D%3D (Pubitemid 32553166)
56. KJ Saleh, et al. 2005 Development and validation of a lower-extremity activity scale. Use for patients treated with revision total knee arthroplasty J Bone Joint Surg Am 87 1985 1994 10.2106/JBJS.D.02564 16140813 (Pubitemid 41279129)
57. Naal FD, Impellizzeri FM, Leunig M (2008) Which is the best activity rating scale for patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res (Epub ahead of print)
58. M Silva CD McClung MA la Rosa FJ Dorey TP Schmalzried 2005 Activity sampling in the assessment of patients with total joint arthroplasty J Arthroplast 20 487 491 10.1016/j.arth.2004.08.013 (Pubitemid 40804455)
59. CA Zahiri TP Schmalzried ES Szuszczewicz HC Amstutz 1998 Assessing activity in joint replacement patients J Arthroplast 13 890 895 10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90195-4 1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FpsVOqsg%3D%3D (Pubitemid 29016797)
60. J Ranstam 2002 Problems in orthopedic research: dependent observations Acta Orthop Scand 73 447 450 12358119
61. G Hulleberg A Aamodt B Espehaug P Benum 2008 A clinical and radiographic 13-year follow-up study of 138 Charnley hip arthroplasties in patients 50-70 years old: comparison of university hospital data and registry data Acta Orthop 79 609 617 10.1080/17453670810016614 18839366
62. SA Lie LB Engesaeter LI Havelin HK Gjessing SE Vollset 2004 Dependency issues in survival analyses of 55, 782 primary hip replacements from 47, 355 patients Stat Med 23 3227 3240 10.1002/sim.1905 15449328 (Pubitemid 39334909)
63. The Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2007) Annual Report 2007