Brain Imaging and Privacy

Neuroethics

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-12

  Räikkä, Juha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Brain imaging; Privacy; Shame

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; MORALITY; NEUROIMAGING; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; REVIEW; SHAME;

EID: 77949654074     PISSN: 18745490     EISSN: 18745504     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-010-9057-5     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Martha J Faraf Paul Root Wolpe 2004 Monitoring and manipulating brain function Hastings Center Report 34 35 45 esp. 39
2. Donald Kennedy 2004 Neuroscience and neuroethics Science 306 373 10.1126/science.306.5695.373 (Pubitemid 39372408)
3. Stacey A Tovino 2005 Currents in contemporary ethics: the confidentiality and privacy implications of functional magnetic resonance imaging The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 33 844 850 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2005.tb00550.x
4. Judy Illes Eric Racine 2005 Imaging or imagining? Neuroethics challenge informed by genetics The American Journal of Bioethics 5 5 18 10.1080/15265160590923358 esp. 11 (Pubitemid 41679293)
5. Paul Root Wolpe, et al. 2005 Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perils The American Journal of Bioethics 5 39 49 10.1080/15265160590923367 esp. 46 (Pubitemid 41673996)
6. Ruth L Fischbach 2005 The brain doesn't lie The American Journal of Bioethics 5 54 55 10.1080/15265160590960979 (Pubitemid 41674000)
7. Levy, Neil. 2007. Neuroethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ch. 4.
8. Guy Kahane 2008 Brain imaging and the inner life The Lancet 371 1572 1573 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60679-0
9. Joseph R Simpson 2008 Functional MRI lie detection: too good to be true? The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 36 491 498 esp. 496
10. Greely, Henry T. 2004. Prediction, litigation, privacy, and property. In Neuroscience and the law, ed. Brent Garland. New York: Dana.
11. Margaret L Eaton Judy Illes 2007 Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology-the ethical terrain Nature Biotechonology 25 393 397 10.1038/nbt0407-393 esp. 395 (Pubitemid 46572835)
12. Walter Glannon 2006 Neuroethics Bioethics 20 37 52 10.1111/j.1467-8519. 2006.00474.x esp. 45 (Pubitemid 43164864)
13. Martha J Farah, et al. 2008 Brain imaging and brain privacy: a realistic concern? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 21 119 127 10.1162/jocn.2009.21010
14. J David Velleman 2001 The genesis of shame Philosophy and Public Affairs 30 27 52 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2001.00027.x esp. 38
15. Gross, H. 1991. Privacy and autonomy. In Philosophy of Law, ed. J. Feinberg and H. Gross. Wadsworth: Belmont.
16. Leary, Mark R. 1996. Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior, 40. Boulder: Westview.
17. Schoeman, Ferninand. 1984. Privacy and intimate information. In Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology, ed. F.D. Schoeman, 403-418. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. esp. 408.
18. James Rachels 1975 Why privacy is important Philosophy & Public Affairs 4 323 333 esp. 327
19. Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior, 108. Chicago: Aldine.
20. Gofman, Erving. 1982. The presentation of self in everyday life. Penguin Books, Reading.
21. James, William. 1983. The principles of psychology, 281. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Simmel, Georg. 1965. The sociology of Georg Simmel, 312. New York: Free.
23. Thomas Nagel 1998 Concealment and exposure Philosophy & Public Affairs 27 3 30 10.1111/j.1088-4963.1998.tb00057.x esp. 6
24. Ruth Gavison 1980 Privacy and the limits of law The Yale Law Journal 89 421 471 10.2307/795891 esp. 453
25. Ryan, Alan. 1991. The theatrical model and concern for privacy. In Philosophy of law, ed. J. Feinberg and H. Gross, 346-348. Belmont: Wadsworth. esp.347.
26. Taylor, Gabriele. 1985. Pride, shame, and guilt: Emotions of self-assessment. Oxford: Clarendon. Ch. III.
27. Williams, Bernard. 1993. Shame and necessity. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Juha Räikkä 2004 On irrational guilt Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 473 485 10.1007/s10677-005-5895-3
29. Cocking, Dean. 2008. Plural selves and relational identity. In Information technology and moral philosophy, ed. J. van den Hoven and J. Weckert, 123-141. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. esp. 128-129.
30. Ekman, Paul. 1985. Telling lies-clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
31. Martha J Farah 2005 Neuroethics: the practical and the philosophical Trends in Cognitive Sciences 9 34 40 10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.001 (Pubitemid 40091931)
32. Farah, Martha J. 2007. Emerging ethical issues in neuroscience. In Defining right and wrong in brain science, ed. W. Glannon, 19-36. New York: Dana. esp. 28.
33. Posner, Richard A. 1991. An economic theory of privacy. In Philosophy of law, ed. J. Feinberg and H. Gross, 349-356. Belmont: Wadsworth.
34. WA Parent 1983 Privacy, morality, and the law Philosophy & Public Affairs 12 269 288 esp. 276
35. DeCew, Judith. 1997. In pursuit of privacy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
36. David Meeler 2008 The Monist 91 151 169
37. Herman T Tavani 2008 Floridi's ontological theory of informational privacy Ethics and Information Technology 10 155 166 10.1007/s10676-008-9154-x
38. Juha Räikkä 2008 Is privacy relative? Journal of Social Philosophy 39 534 546 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00441.x
39. Wasserstrom, Richard A. 1984. Privacy: Some arguments and assumptions. In Philosophical dimensions of privacy: An anthology, ed. F.D. Schoeman, 317-332. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Kant, Immanuel. 1996. Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. 250.
41. Lynette Reid Françoise Baylis 2005 Brains, genes, and the making of the self The American Journal of Bioethics 5 21 23 10.1080/15265160590960401 (Pubitemid 41673987)
42. Jennifer Kulynych 2002 Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research Brain and Cognition 50 345 357 10.1016/S0278-2626(02)00518-3 (Pubitemid 36042961)
43. Garland, Brent (ed.). 2004. Neuroscience and the law. New York: Dana.
44. Ian Kerr Jena McGill 2007 Emanations, snoop dogs and reasonable expectations of privacy Criminal Law Quarterly 52 392 432
45. Uttal, William R. 2008. Neuroscience in the courtroom. Tuscon: Lawyers & Judges.
46. Robert Merrihew Adams 1985 Involuntary sins The Philosophical Review 94 3 31 10.2307/2184713