-
1
-
-
0041659343
-
The positivity ratio - another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation
-
Geier J, Uter W, Lessmann H, Schnuch A. The positivity ratio - another parameter to assess the diagnostic quality of a patch test preparation. Contact Dermatitis 2003;48:280-2.
-
(2003)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.48
, pp. 280-282
-
-
Geier, J.1
Uter, W.2
Lessmann, H.3
Schnuch, A.4
-
2
-
-
0026764893
-
The reaction index: A parameter to assess the quality of patch test preparations
-
Brasch J, Henseler T. The reaction index: a parameter to assess the quality of patch test preparations. Contact Dermatitis 1992;37:203-4.
-
(1992)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.37
, pp. 203-204
-
-
Brasch, J.1
Henseler, T.2
-
3
-
-
0029609689
-
Evaluation of patch test results by use of the reaction index. An analysis of data recorded by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)
-
Brasch J, Geier J, Henseler T. Evaluation of patch test results by use of the reaction index. An analysis of data recorded by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK). Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:375-80.
-
(1995)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.33
, pp. 375-380
-
-
Brasch, J.1
Geier, J.2
Henseler, T.3
-
4
-
-
37249042351
-
The reaction index and positivity ratio revisited
-
Andersen KE, Andersen F. The reaction index and positivity ratio revisited. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:28-31.
-
(2008)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.58
, pp. 28-31
-
-
Andersen, K.E.1
Andersen, F.2
-
5
-
-
0029081860
-
North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992-1994)
-
Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group standard tray patch test results (1992-1994). Am J Contact Dermat 1995;6:160-5.
-
(1995)
Am J Contact Dermat
, vol.6
, pp. 160-165
-
-
Marks, J.G.1
Belsito, D.V.2
DeLeo, V.A.3
-
6
-
-
0031808340
-
North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed hypersensitivity to topical allergens
-
Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results for the detection of delayed hypersensitivity to topical allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 1998;38:911-8.
-
(1998)
J Am Acad Dermatol
, vol.38
, pp. 911-918
-
-
Marks, J.G.1
Belsito, D.V.2
DeLeo, V.A.3
-
7
-
-
10744220763
-
North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 1998-2000 data
-
Marks JG, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results: 1998-2000 data. Am J Contact Dermat 2003;14:59-62.
-
(2003)
Am J Contact Dermat
, vol.14
, pp. 59-62
-
-
Marks, J.G.1
Belsito, D.V.2
DeLeo, V.A.3
-
8
-
-
13844262799
-
North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period
-
Pratt MD, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch-test results, 2001-2002 study period. Dermatitis 2004;15:176-83.
-
(2004)
Dermatitis
, vol.15
, pp. 176-183
-
-
Pratt, M.D.1
Belsito, D.V.2
DeLeo, V.A.3
-
9
-
-
38149109568
-
North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2003-2004 study period
-
Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, DeLeo VA, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group patch test results 2003-2004 study period. Dermatitis 2008;19:129-36.
-
(2008)
Dermatitis
, vol.19
, pp. 129-136
-
-
Warshaw, E.M.1
Belsito, D.V.2
DeLeo, V.A.3
-
10
-
-
67649546308
-
North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006 patch test results
-
Zug KA, Warshaw EM, Belsito DV, et al. North American Contact Dermatitis Group 2005-2006 patch test results. Dermatitis 2009;20:149-60.
-
(2009)
Dermatitis
, vol.20
, pp. 149-160
-
-
Zug, K.A.1
Warshaw, E.M.2
Belsito, D.V.3
-
11
-
-
41149156092
-
Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix
-
Devos SA, Constandt L, Tupker RA, et al. Relevance of positive patch-test reactions to fragrance mix. Dermatitis 2008;19:43-7.
-
(2008)
Dermatitis
, vol.19
, pp. 43-47
-
-
Devos, S.A.1
Constandt, L.2
Tupker, R.A.3
-
12
-
-
2442680114
-
Contact allergy to fragrances: Frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK
-
Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Geier J, et al. Contact allergy to fragrances: frequencies of sensitization from 1996 to 2002. Results of the IVDK. Contact Dermatitis 2004;50:65-76.
-
(2004)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.50
, pp. 65-76
-
-
Schnuch, A.1
Lessmann, H.2
Geier, J.3
-
13
-
-
0028800883
-
Patch testing with fragrances: Results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes
-
Frosch PJ, Pilz B, Andersen KE, et al. Patch testing with fragrances: results of a multicenter study of the European Environmental and Contact Dermatitis Research Group with 48 frequently used constituents of perfumes. Contact Dermatitis 1995;33:333-42.
-
(1995)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.33
, pp. 333-342
-
-
Frosch, P.J.1
Pilz, B.2
Andersen, K.E.3
-
14
-
-
34047192986
-
Fragrance
-
Storrs FJ. Fragrance. Dermatitis 2007;18:3-7.
-
(2007)
Dermatitis
, vol.18
, pp. 3-7
-
-
Storrs, F.J.1
-
15
-
-
0018174033
-
-
Mitchell JC. Day 7 (D7) patch test reading: valuable or not? Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:139-41.
-
Mitchell JC. Day 7 (D7) patch test reading: valuable or not? Contact Dermatitis 1978;4:139-41.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
0019382635
-
New results and some remarks to the angry back syndrome
-
Bandmann HJ, Agathos M. New results and some remarks to the "angry back syndrome." Contact Dermatitis 1981;7:23-6.
-
(1981)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.7
, pp. 23-26
-
-
Bandmann, H.J.1
Agathos, M.2
-
17
-
-
0029792436
-
Day 4 is better than day 3 for single patch test reading
-
Todd DJ, Handley J, Metwali M, et al. Day 4 is better than day 3 for single patch test reading. Contact Dermatitis 1996;34:402-4.
-
(1996)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.34
, pp. 402-404
-
-
Todd, D.J.1
Handley, J.2
Metwali, M.3
-
18
-
-
17844382125
-
Patch testing discordance alert: False-negative findings with rubber additives and fragrances
-
Sherertz EF, Fransway AF, Belsito DV, et al. Patch testing discordance alert: false-negative findings with rubber additives and fragrances. J Am Acad Dermatol 2001;45:313-4.
-
(2001)
J Am Acad Dermatol
, vol.45
, pp. 313-314
-
-
Sherertz, E.F.1
Fransway, A.F.2
Belsito, D.V.3
-
19
-
-
42149171658
-
How to use the reaction index and positivity ratio
-
Brasch J, Geier J. How to use the reaction index and positivity ratio. Contact Dermatitis 2008;59:63-5.
-
(2008)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.59
, pp. 63-65
-
-
Brasch, J.1
Geier, J.2
-
20
-
-
42149174407
-
Validity of reaction index and positivity ratio
-
Andersen KE, Andersen F. Validity of reaction index and positivity ratio. Contact Dermatitis 2008;58:320.
-
(2008)
Contact Dermatitis
, vol.58
, pp. 320
-
-
Andersen, K.E.1
Andersen, F.2
-
21
-
-
0032853574
-
Significance- prevalence index number: A reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group
-
Maouad M, Fleischer AB Jr, Sherertz EF, Feldman SR. Significance- prevalence index number: a reinterpretation and enhancement of data from the North American Contact Dermatitis Group. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999;41:573-6.
-
(1999)
J Am Acad Dermatol
, vol.41
, pp. 573-576
-
-
Maouad, M.1
Fleischer Jr, A.B.2
Sherertz, E.F.3
Feldman, S.R.4
-
22
-
-
34548530263
-
In pursuit of defining clinical relevance of positive patch tests results
-
Wolf R, Davidovici B, Stone SP, Tuzun Y. In pursuit of defining clinical relevance of positive patch tests results. Clin Dermatol 2007;25:493-4.
-
(2007)
Clin Dermatol
, vol.25
, pp. 493-494
-
-
Wolf, R.1
Davidovici, B.2
Stone, S.P.3
Tuzun, Y.4
|