Repositories and journals: Are they in conflict?: A literature review of relevant literature

Aslib Proceedings

Volumn 62, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 112-143

  Brown, David J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Digital libraries; Journal publishers; Research libraries; Serials

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES; COMMERCIAL RELATIONSHIP; DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH; DIGITAL ARCHIVES; EUROPEAN COMMISSION; JOURNAL PUBLISHERS; JOURNAL PUBLISHING; LITERATURE REVIEWS; PEER GROUPS; RESEARCH GROUPS; RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; RESEARCH LIBRARIES; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; STRATEGIC CHALLENGES;

PUBLISHING; RESEARCH;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 77949561720     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1108/00012531011034955     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Anderson, I. (2008), “The audacity of SCOAP3”, Scholarly Communication, ARL 257, available at: www.arl.org/resources/pubs/br/br257.shtml (accessed December 2009).
2. Association of Research Libraries (2009), The Research Library's Role in Digital Repository Services, Digital Repository Issues Task Force, available at: www.arl.org/bm∼doc/repository-services-report.pdf (accessed December 2009).
3. Awre, C. and Baldwin, C. (2005), “A summary of the JISC FAIR programme”, New Review of Information Networking, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 137-58.
4. Beckett, C. and Inger, S. (2007), Self Archiving and Journal Subscriptions: Coexistence or Competition? An International Survey of Librarians' Preferences, Scholarly Information Strategies Ltd, Publishing Research Consortium (PRC), London.
5. Berkeley Electronic Press (2003), press release, 23 April 2003, available at: www.bepress.com/press 042303 (accessed December 2009).
6. Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing (2003), available at: www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/bethesda.htm (accessed December 2009).
7. Brighton, R. (2008), Open Access to Research Outputs, Final Report to RCUK (Research Councils UK), LISU (Loughborough University) and SQW Consulting (Cambridge), Research Open Access Repository (ROAR), University of East London, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/reppres/sue/iruel.aspx (accessed December 2009).
8. Brooks, T. (2009), SymmetBreaking, Vol. 5 No. 5, available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4740 (accessed December 2009).
9. Cambridge Economic Policy Associates (2008), Activities, Costs and Funding Flows in the Scholarly Communications System, commissioned by Research Information Network (RIN) in association with PRC, SCONUL and RLUK, London.
10. Cox, J. and Cox, L. (2008), Scholarly Publishing Practice – Academic Journal Publishers' Policies and Practices in Online Scholarly Publishing, Third Survey, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP), Shoreham-by-Sea.
11. Crow, R. (2002), “The case for institutional repositories”, Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC), Washington, DC, available at: http://ignucius.bd.ub.es:8180/dspace/handle/123456789/315 (accessed December 2009).
12. Davis, P.M. and Connolly, M.J.L. (2007), “Institutional repositories – evaluating the reasons for non-use of Cornell University's installation of DSpace”, D-Lib Magazine, Vol. 13 Nos 3/4, available at: www.dlib.org/dlib/march07/davis/03davis.html (accessed December 2009).
13. Dewatripont, M., Ginsburgh, V., Legros, P. and Walckiers, A. (2006), “Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe”, European Commission (Research Directorate-General), available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/scientific-publication-study_en.pdf (accessed December 2009).
14. European Commission (2007a), Communication on Scientific Information in the Digital Age: Access, Dissemination and Preservation, COM(2007)56, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/conferences/2009/era2009/speakers/papers/paper_alma_swan.pdf (accessed December 2009).
15. European Commission (2007b), Green Paper – The European Research Area: New Perspectives, COM(2007)161, available at: www.wbc-inco.net/doc/1260.html.
16. European Commission (2008a), “FP7 Pilot Programme Budget”, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/index.cfm?fuseaction=public.topic&id=1680 (accessed December 2009).
17. European Commission (2008b), Open Access – Opportunities and Challenges, A Handbook, EUR 23459, Directorate General for Research, Science, Economy and Society, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/open-access-handbook_en.pdf (accessed December 2009).
18. Foulonneau, M. and André, F. (2008), The Investigative Study of Standards for Digital Repositories and Related Services, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, available at: www.driver-support.eu/linkspubs/standardsstudy.html (accessed December 2009).
19. Gentil-Beccot, A., Salvatore, M. and Brooks, T. (2009), Citing and Reading Behaviours in High-Energy Physics: How a Community Stopped Worrying about Journals and Learned to Love Repositories, Travis Brooks, available at: http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/607-guid.html (accessed December 2009).
20. Guedon, J.-C. (2004), “The ‘Green’ and ‘Gold’ roads to open access: the case for mixing and matching”, Serials Review, Vol. 30 No. 4, available at: www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00987913.
21. Haque, A. and Ginsparg, P. (2009), “Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv”, SymmetBreaking, available at: http://arXiv.org/abs/0907.4740 (accessed December 2009).
22. Harley, D., Earl-Novell, S., Krzys Acord, S., Lawrence, S. and Judson King, C. (2008), Interim Report: Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication, Center for Studies in Higher Education, University of Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, available at: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/research/scholarlycommunication/ (accessed December 2009).
23. Harnad, S. (1994), “Publicly retrievable FTP archives for esoteric science and scholarship: a subversive proposal”, paper presented at the Network Services Conference, London, 28-30 November.
24. Harnad, S., Brody, T., Vallieres, F., Carr, L., Hitchcock, S., Gingras, Y., Oppenheim, C., Stamerjoanns, H. and Hilo, E.R. (2004), “The green and the gold roads to open access”, Nature, available at: www.nature.com/nature/focus/accessdebate/21.html (accessed December 2009).
25. Houghton, J. (2009), “Benefits of open access clearly outweigh costs in three European countries”, Knowledge Exchange, available at: www.knowledge-exchange.info/Default.aspx?ID=316 (accessed December 2009).
26. Houghton, J. and Sheehan, P. (2006), “The economic impact of enhanced access to research findings”, CSES Working Paper 23, Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne.
27. Houghton, J., de Jonge, J. and van Oloo, M. (2009a), Costs and Benefits of Research Communications: The Dutch Situation, EIM and Research voor Beleid, Zoetermeer.
28. Houghton, J., Rasmussen, B., Sheehan, S., Oppenheim, C., Morris, A., Creaser, C., Greenwood, H., Summers, M. and Gourlay, A. (2009b), Economic Implications of Alternative Scholarly Publishing Models: Exploring the Costs and Benefits, JISC EI-ASPM Project, Report to the Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC) (UK), CSES and Loughborough University, January, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/documents/economicpublishingmodelsfinalreport.aspx (accessed December 2009).
29. Hubbard, W. (2003), “SHERPA and institutional repositories”, Serials, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 243-7.
30. Joint Information Services Committee (2009a), Repositories Support Project Briefing Papers, Centre for Research Communications (University of Nottingham), available at: www.rsp.ac.uk/pubs/briefing-papers and www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/reppres/repsupport.aspx (accessed December 2009).
31. Joint Information Services Committee (2009b), JISC 2009 Roadmap, available at: www.jisc.ac.uk/fundingopportunities/futurecalls.aspx (accessed December 2009).
32. Morris, S. (2009), “Journal authors' rights: perception and reality”, Summary Paper 5, Publishing Research Consortium, available at: www.publishingresearch.net/documents/JournalAuthorsRights.pdf (accessed December 2009).
33. Open Archives Initiative (2008), Open Archives Initiative, Protocol for Metadata Harvesting. Protocol Version 2.0, document version December 2008 07T20, available at: www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/openarchivesprotocol.htm (accessed December 2009).
34. Pinfield, S. (2005), “A mandate to self archive? The role of open access institutional repositories”, Serials, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 30-4.
35. Potočnik, J. (2009), RIC 2009, Conference on Research Infrastructures and the Regional Dimension of ERA, Research Informatics Conference, Prague, 25 March.
36. Ranking Web of World Universities (2009), available at: www.webometrics.info (accessed December 2009).
37. Regazzi, J. and Aytac, S. (2007), Author-perceived Quality Characteristics of Science, Technology and Medicine (STM) Journals, ALPSP Research Report, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, Shoreham-by-Sea.
38. RoMEO (2009), “Publisher copyright policies and self archiving”, available at: www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/ (accessed December 2009).
39. Rowlands, I. and Nicholas, D. (2005), New Journal Publishing Models – An International Survey of Senior Researchers, CIBER, University College London, London.
40. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D. and Huntingdon, P. (2004), Scholarly Communication in the Digital Environment: What Do Authors Want? Findings of An International Survey of Author Opinion, Project Report, CIBER, Publishers' Association, London.
41. Sprouse, G.D. (2009), “OA in gigh energy physics Arxiv yields five-fold citation advantage”, American Physical Society, 23 July, available at: American-Scientists-Open-Access-Forum@Listserver.Sigmaxi.org (accessed December 2009).
42. Swan, A. (2008), Key Concerns within the Scholarly Communication Process – Report to the JISC Scholarly Communications Group, Key Perspectives Ltd, Truro, available at: www.keyperspectives.co.uk/ (accessed December 2009).
43. Swan, A. (2009), listserv commentary by Dr Alma Swan, American-scientist-open-access-forum@sigma.org, 21 July.
44. Swan, A. and Brown, S. (2005), Open Access Self-Archiving: An Author Study, Key Perspectives Ltd, Truro, available at: www.keyperspectives.co.uk/ (accessed December 2009).
45. Tenopir, C. and King, W. (2000), Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians, and Publishers, Special Libraries Association, Washington, DC.
46. UK Select Committee of Enquiry on Scientific Publications (2004), Scientific Publications: Free for All?, Tenth Report of Session 2003-04 House of Commons Science and Technology Committee, available at: www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/399/399.pdf (accessed December 2009).
47. US Government (2008), Congress of the United States HR 2764 110th NIH Public Access Policy Division G, Title II, Section 218 of PL 110-161 (Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008).
48. US Government (2009a), Federal Research Public Access Act of 2009 (S.1373), Cornyn, John (R-TX); Lieberman, Joe (D-CT).
49. US Government (2009b), Fair Copyright in Research Works Act (FCRWA), John Conyers (D-MI), available at: www.earlham.edu/∼peters/fos/newsletter/03-02-09.htm#conyers (accessed December 2009).
50. Universities UK (2007), Publishing Research Results: The Challenges of Open Access, policy briefing, Universities UK, London.
51. Waltham, M. (2008), “The future of scholarly journals publishing among social science and humanities associations”, available at: www.nhalliance.org/news/humanities-social-science-scholarly-journal-publis.shtml (accessed December 2009).
52. Ware, M. (2006), ALPSP Survey of Librarians on Factors in Journal Cancellations, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP)/Mark Ware Consulting, Shoreham-by-Sea.
53. Weenink, K., Waaijers, L. and van Godtsenhoven, K. (Eds) (2007), DRIVER's Guide to Repositories, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
54. Wellcome Trust (2008a), Position Statement in Support of Open and Unrestricted Access to Published Research, available at: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/about-us/policy/spotlight-issues/open-access/policy/index.htm (accessed December 2009).
55. Wellcome Trust (2008b), Grant Conditions and Authors’ Guide and FAQ, available at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@sf_central_grants_admin/document (accessed December 2009).
56. Wellcome Trust (2009), Publishers’ Guide and FAQ, available at: www.wellcome.ac.uk/about-us/policy/spotlight-issues/open-access/policy/WTX031743.htm (accessed December 2009).
57. Lynch, C.A. (2003), “Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age”, Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 3 No. 2, available at: http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/portal_libraries_and_the_academy/v003/3.2lynch.pdf (accessed December 2009).
58. Wellcome Trust (2004), Costs and Business Models in Scientific Research Publishing, SQW Consulting, Cambridge.