An optimization andmodeling approach for H2O2/UV-C oxidation of a commercial non-ionic textile surfactant using central composite design

Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology

Volumn 85, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 493-501

  Arslan Alaton, Idil ^a   Akin, Asli ^a   Olmez Hanci, Tugba ^a  

^a ISTANBUL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Advanced oxidation processes; H 2O2 UV C treatment; Non ionic surfactant; Process optimization; Response surface methodology; Textile preparation

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED OXIDATION; ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES; AQUEOUS SURFACTANT SOLUTIONS; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; COD AND TOC REMOVALS; COMPLETE OXIDATION; COMPLEX ORGANICS; ECOTOXICOLOGICAL RISKS; EXPERIMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; INDUSTRIAL SURFACTANTS; INITIAL PH; MAIN PARAMETERS; NONIONIC; POLYNOMIAL EQUATION; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS VARIABLES; QUADRATIC MODELS; REACTION CONDITIONS; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL DESIGN; TEXTILE SURFACTANTS; TREATMENT CONDITIONS; TREATMENT PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT TIME; UV DOSE;

COMPLEXATION; DESIGN; DIGITAL CAMERAS; HYDROCARBONS; OPTIMIZATION; OXIDATION; OXIDATION RESISTANCE; OXYGEN; POLYNOMIALS; PROCESS CONTROL; REMOVAL; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TEXTILE PROCESSING; TEXTILES;

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND;

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; SURFACTANT;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MINERALIZATION; OXIDATION; PH; PHOTOREACTIVITY; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; REACTION TIME; REACTOR; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON; ULTRAVIOLET C RADIATION;

EID: 77949539527     PISSN: 02682575     EISSN: 10974660     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.2315     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Van de Plassche EJ, De Bruijn JHM, Stephenson RR, Marshall SJ, Feijtel TCJ and Belanger SE, Predicted no-effect concentrations and risk characterization of four surfactants: linear alkyl benzene sulfonate, alcohol ethoxylates, alcohol ethoxylated sulfates, and soap. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2653-2663 (1999).
2. Utsunomiya A, Watanukii T, Matsusi-fita K, Nishina M and Tomita I, Assessment of the toxicity of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate and quaternary alkylammonium chloride by measuring 13C-glycerol in Dunaliella sp. Chemosphere 35:2479-90 (1997).
3. Arslan-Alaton I, Cokgor EU and Koban B, Integrated photochemical and biological treatment of a commercial textile surfactant: process optimization, process kinetics and COD fractionation. J Hazard Mater 146:453-458 (2007).
4. IPPC, Reference Document on Best Available Techniques for the Textiles Industry. European IPPC Bureau, Seville, Spain (2003).
5. Euratex E-D, Textile Industry BREF Document. Ch.2-3-4-5-6 (2000).
6. Ikehata K and El-Din MG, Degradation of recalcitrant surfactants in waste-water by ozonation and advanced oxidation processes: a review. Ozone Sci Eng 26:327-343 (2004).
7. Swisher RD, Surfactant Biodegradation, 2nd edn. Marcel Dekker, New York (1987).
8. Lara-Martin PA, Gomez-Parra A, Köchling T, Sanz JL, Amils R and Gonzales-Mazo E, Anaerobic degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates in coastal marine sediments. Environ Sci Technol 41:3573-3579 (2007).
9. Ying G-G, Fate, behavior and effects of surfactants and their degradation products in the environment. Environ Int 32:417-431 (2006).
10. Scott MJ and Jones MN, The biodegradation of surfactants in the environment. Biochim Biophys Acta 1508:235-251 (2000).
11. Arslan-Alaton I and Erdinc E, Effect of photochemical treatment on the biocompatibility of a commercial non-ionic surfactant used in the textile industry. Water Res 40:3409-3418 (2006).
12. Parsons S, Advanced Oxidation Processes for Water and Waste-water Treatment. IWA Publishing, London (2004).
13. US Environmental Protection Agency, Handbook for Advanced Photochemical Oxidation Processes. EPA/625/R-98/004, Cincinnati, Ohio (1998).
14. CCOT, The AOP Handbook. Calgon Carbon Oxidation Technologies, Markham, Ontario (1995).
15. Alnaizy R and Akgerman A, Oxidative treatment of high explosives contaminated wastewater. Water Res 33:2021-2030 (1999).
16. Glaze WH, Lay Y and Kang JW, Advanced oxidation processes - a kinetic-model for the oxidation of 1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane in water by the combination of hydrogen-peroxide and UV-radiation. Ind Eng Chem Res 34:2314-2323 (1995).
17. Legrini O, Oliveros E and Braun AM, Photochemical processes for water treatment. Chem Res 93:671-698 (1993).
18. 2. Environ Technol 18:179-185 (1997).
19. Ince NH, 'Critical' effect of hydrogen peroxide in photochemical dye degradation. Water Res 33:1080-1084 (1999).
20. Baxendale JH and Wilson JA, The photolysis of hydrogen peroxide at high light intensities. Trans Faraday Soc 53:344-356 (1957).
21. Stasinakis AS,Use of selected advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for waste-water treatment - a mini review. Global NEST J 10:376-385 (2008).
22. 2 process. J Appl Sci 8:1108-1122 (2008).
23. 2: influence of operational parameters. Chemosphere 55:129-134 (2004).
24. Alim MA, Lee JH, Akoh CC, Choi MS, Jeon MS and Shin JA, Enzymatic transesterification of fractionated rice bran oil with conjugated linoleic acid: optimization by response surface methodology. LWT-Food Sci Technol 41:764-770 (2008).
25. Ravikumar K, Ramalingam S, Krishnan S and Balu K, Application of response surface methodology to optimize the process variables for Reactive Red and Acid Brown dye removal using a novel adsorbent. Dyes Pigments 70:18-26 (2006).
26. Montgomery DC, Design and Analysis of Experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York (1991).
27. Mu Y, Zheng X-J and Yu H-Q, Determining optimum conditions for hydrogen production from glucose by an anaerobic culture using response surfacemethodology (RSM). Int J Hydrogen Energy 23:1-5 (2009).
28. Olmez T, The optimization of Cr (VI) reduction and removal by electrocoagulation using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 162:1371-1378 (2009).
29. Xiarchos I, Jaworska A and Zakrzewska-Trznadel G, Response surface methodology for the modelling of copper removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 321:222-231 (2008).
30. Wang J-P, Chen Y-Z, Ge X-W and Yu H-Q, Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process forapaper-recyclingwaste-water treatment using response surface methodology. Colloids Surfaces A: Physicochem Eng Aspects 302:204-210 (2007).
31. Zinatizadeh AAL, Mohamed AR, Abdullah AZ, Mashitah MD, Hasnain Isa M and Najafpour GD, Process modeling and analysis of palm oil mill effluent treatment in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor using response surface methodology (RSM). Water Res 40:3193-3208 (2006).
32. Sudarjanto G, Keller-Lehmann B and Keller J, Optimization of integrated chemical-biological degradation of a reactive azo dye using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 138:160-168 (2006).
33. Ahmadi M, Vahabzadeh F, Bonakdarpour B, Mofarrah E and Mehranian M, Application of the central composite design and response surface methodology to the advanced treatment of olive oil processing waste-water using Fenton's peroxidation. J Hazard Mater B123:187-195 (2005).
34. Khuri AI, An overview of the use of generalized linear models in response surface methodology. Nonlinear Anal 47:2023-2034 (2001).
35. Nicole I, De Laat J, Dore M, Duguet JP and Bonnel C, Use of UV radiation in water treatment: measurement of photonic flux by hydrogen peroxide actinometry. Water Res 24:157-168 (1990).
36. ISO 6060, Water Quality - Determination of the Chemical Oxygen Demand, 2nd edn. ISO Copyright Office, Geneva (1989).
37. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Washington, DC (1980).
38. 2 process: influence of operational parameters and reaction mechanism. J Hazard Mater 139:275-279 (2007).
39. 2/UV-A processes. Water Res 36:1143-1154 (2002).
40. Alaton IA and Balcioglu IA, Photochemical and heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of waste vinylsulphone dyes: a case study with hydrolysed Reactive Black 5. J Photochem Photobiol A 141:247-254 (2001).
41. 2 suspensions. J Hazard Mater 144:265-273 (2007).
42. Körbahti BK, Response surface optimization of electrochemical treatment of textile dye wastewater. J Hazard Mater 145:277-286 (2007).
43. Arslan-Alaton I, Tureli G and Olmez-Hanci T, Treatment of azo dye production wastewaters using photo-Fenton-like advanced oxidation processes: optimization by response surface methodology. J Photochem Photobiol A 202:142-153 (2009).
44. 2 photocatalytic process coupled with response surfacemethodology. Chem Eng J 112:173-179 (2005).
45. Arslan I and Balcioglu IA, Treatment of textile wastewater by heterogenous photocatalytic oxidation processes. Environ Technol 18:1053-1059 (1997).
46. 2 surface. J Photochem Photobiol A 69:241 (1992).
47. Buxton GV, Greenstock CL, Helman WP and Ross AB, Critical view of rate constants for reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms, hydroxyl radicals in aqueous solution. J. Phys Chem Ref Data 17:513-886 (1988).
48. Körbahti BK and Rauf MA, Application of response surface analysis to the photolytic degradation of Basic Red 2 dye. Chem Eng J 138:166-171 (2008).
49. 2 using response surface methodology. J Hazard Mater 161:281-286 (2009).
50. Catalkaya EC and Kargi F, Effects of operating parameters on advanced oxidation of diuron by the Fenton's reagent: a statistical design approach. Chemosphere 69:485-492 (2007).