The impact of a physician-directed health information technology system on diabetes outcomes in primary care: A pre- And postimplementation study

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 165-174

  Hunt, Jacquelyn S ^a,b   Siemienczuk, Joseph ^a   Gillanders, William ^c,d   Leblanc, Benjamin H ^e   Rozenfeld, Yelena ^g   Bonin, Kerry ^a   Pape, Ginger ^b,f  

^a Providence Health and Services   (United States)

^b OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Graduate Medical Education   (United States)

^d OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e Kaiser Permanente   (United States)

^f Pharmacy Providence Health and Services   (United States)

^g College of Pharmacy ^*

Author keywords

Diabetes; Health information technology; Primary care

Indexed keywords

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN; LOW DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REMINDER SYSTEM; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; CHOLESTEROL, LDL; COHORT STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; FEMALE; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; OFFICE VISITS; OREGON; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POINT-OF-CARE SYSTEMS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 77949536234     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.731     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Engelgau MM, Geiss LS, Saaddine JB et al The evolving diabetes burden in the United States. Annals of Internal Medicine 2004; 140:945-950
2. Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW and Williamson DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association 2003;290:1884-1890
3. Saaddine JB, Cadwell B, Gregg EW et al Improvements in diabetes processes of care and intermediate outcomes: United States, 1988-2002. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006;144:465-474
4. Saydah SH, Fradkin J and Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004;291:335-342
5. Saaddine IB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL, Gregg EW, Thompson TJ and Narayan KM. A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002; 136:565-574
6. Fuke D, Hunt J, Siemienczuk J et al Cholesterol management of patients with diabetes in a primary care practice-based research network. American Journal of Managed Care 2004;10:130-136
7. Whitford DL and Roberts SH. Changes in prevalence and site of care of diabetes in a health district 1991-2001. Diabetic Medicine 2004;21:640-643
8. Dagogo-Jack S. Preventing diabetes related morbidity and mortality in the primary care setting. Journal of the National Medical Association 2002;94:549-560
9. Verbrugge LM and Patrick DL. Seven chronic conditions: their impact on US adults' activity levels and use of medical services. American Journal of Public Health 1995;85:173-182
10. Frostholm L, Fink P, Christensen KS et al The patients' illness perceptions and the use of primary health care. Psychosomatic Medicine 2005;67:997-1005.
11. Jaen CR, Stange KC and Nutting PA. Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services. Journal of Family Practice 1994;38:166-171
12. DeBusk RF, West JA, Miller NH and Taylor CB. Chronic disease management: treating the patient with disease(s) vs treating disease(s) in the patient. Archives of Internal Medicine 1999;159:2739-2742
13. Renders CM, VaIk GD, Griffin SJ, Wagner EH, Eijk Van JT and Assendelft WJ. Interventions to improve the management of diabetes in primary care, outpatient, and community settings: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1821-1833
14. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM et al Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-regression analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006;296:427-440
15. Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams OD, Person SD, Weaver MT and Weissman NW. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association 2001;285:2871-2879
16. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27:S15-S35.
17. Montori VM, Bjornsen SS, Green EM et al. Performance of the provider recognition program's survey to assess patient satisfaction with the provision of diabetes care in primary care. American Journal of Managed Care 2002; 8:365-372
18. Dmitrienko A, Molenberghs G, Chuang-Stein C and Offen W. Analysis of Clinical Trials Using SAS: a practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Publishing, 2005.
19. Friedman L, Furberg CD and DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Triab (3e). New York: Springer-Verlag, 1998.
20. Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B and Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007;167:1400-1405
21. Grant RW, Oagliero E, Sullivan CM et al A controlled trial of population management: diabetes mellitus putting evidence into practice (DM-PEP). Diabetes Care 2004;27:2299-2305
22. Montori VM, Dinneen SF, Gorman CA et al The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1952-1957
23. Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A et al. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003;26:750-757
24. O'Connor PJ, Crain AL, Rush WA, Sperl-Hillen JM, Gutenkauf JJ and Duncan JE. Impact of an electronic medical record on diabetes quality of care. Annals of Family Medicine 2005;3:300-306
25. Chang JT, Hays RD, Shekelle PG et al. Patients' global ratings of their health care are not associated with the technical quality of their care.[summary for patients in Annals of Internal Medicine 2006;144(9):I26. PMID: 16670130].
26. Annals of Internal Medicine 2006;144(9): 665-672
27. O'Connor PJ, Solberg LI and Baird M. The future of primary care. The enhanced primary care model. Journal of Family Practice 1998;47(l):62-67
28. Wolfe RA. Observational studies are just as effective as randomized clinical trials. Blood Purif 2000;18(4):323-326