Further changes are needed if the national care record service (NCRS) implementation is to succeed

Informatics in Primary Care

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 161-164

  Herbert, Ian ^b   De Lusignan, Simon ^a  

^a Barn Cottage   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MASS COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORD; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; UNITED KINGDOM;

COMPUTER SECURITY; CONFIDENTIALITY; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL INFORMATICS APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; STATE MEDICINE;

EID: 77949532438     PISSN: 14760320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14236/jhi.v17i3.735     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Cresswell K and Sheikh A. NHS Care Record Service: recommendations from the literature on successful implementation and adoption. Informatics in Primary Care 2009; 17:153-164
2. Berg M, Aarts J and van der Lei J. ICT in health care: sociotechnical approaches. Methods of Information in Medicine 2003;42:297-301.
3. Navarro R. An ethical framework for sharing patient data without consent. Informatics in Primary Care 2008; 16:257-262
4. Neame R. Privacy and health information: health cards offer a workable solution. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16:263-270
5. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, Byrne E, Mohammad Y and Russell J. Introduction of shared electronic records: multi-site case study using diffusion of innovation theory. BMJ 2008;337:a1786.
6. Anderson F, Böhm N, Dowty T et al Consultation Response on the Data Sharing Review, www.fipr.org/ 080215datasharing.pdf
7. Anderson R, Brown I, Dowty T, Heath W, Ingelsant P and Sasse A. Database State. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation - Reform Trust, 2009. www.jrrt.org.uk/ uploads/Database%20State.pdf
8. Hawking M. The Single Shared Electronic Patient Record (SSEPR): problems with functionality and governance. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16:157-8; discussion 159.
9. BCS Health. The way forward for NHS health informatics. Where should NHS Connecting for Health (NHS CFH) go from here? London; BCS, 2006. www.bcs.org/upload/ pdf/BCS-HIF-report.pdf
10. Department of Health, Health Informatics Review. The Swindells report. London; Department of Health, 2008. www.dh.gov.uk/prod-consum-dh/groups/dh- digital assets/@dh/@en/documents/digitalasset/dh-086127.pdf
11. de Lusignan S, Chan T, Theadom A and Dhoul N. The roles of policy and professionalism in the protection of processed clinical data: a literature review. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76:261-268
12. van der Lei J. Use and abuse of computer-stored medical records. Methods of Information in Medicine 1991;30:7980.
13. de Lusignan S and Mimnagh C. Breaking the first law of informatics: the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in the dock. Informatics in Primary Care 2006; 14:153-156
14. Kaushal R, Jha AK, Franz C et al ( Brigham and Women's Hospital CPOE Working Group). Return on investment for a computerized physician order entry system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2006;13: 261-6.
15. de Lusignan S and Aarts J. UK's National Programme for IT welcomes recommendation for a more sociotechnical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record. Informatics in Primary Care 2008;16:75-77
16. Royal Academy of Engineers and British Computer Society. The challenges of complex IT projects. London: RAE, 2004. www.raeng.org.uk/news/publications/ list/ reports/Complex-IT-Projects.pdf
17. Royal College of General Practitioners. Shared Record Professional Guidance. London: RCGP, 2009. www.rcgp. org.uk/get-involvea7informatics-group/ shared-recordprofessional-guidance.aspx
18. Scott RE. E-records in health: preserving our future. International Journal of Medical Informatics 2007;76: 427-431
19. NHS Connecting for Health. Data Migration Handbook. 2006. NPFIT-TEC-CEN-0002.01