Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: A prospective comparative study

Minerva Medica

Volumn 100, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 341-347

  Scaffidi, M G ^a   Luigiano, C ^a   Consolo, P ^a   Pellicano, R ^b   Giacobbe, G ^a   Gaeta, M ^a   Blandino, A ^a   Familiari, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

^b MOLINETTE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic retrograde; Cholangiopancreatography, magnetic resonance; Choledocholithiasis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BILE DUCT OBSTRUCTION; COMMON BILE DUCT STONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, MAGNETIC RESONANCE; FEMALE; GALLSTONES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77949523625     PISSN: 00264806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Baillie J. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the gastroenterologist's perspective. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:S13-S5.
2. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JL, Elta GH, Nostrant TT, Chey WD et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2900-4.
3. Sugijama M, Atomi Y, Hachiya J. Magnetic resonance cholangiography using half-Fourier acquisition for diagnosing choledocholithiasis. Am J Gastroenterol 1998;93:1886-90.
4. Becker CD, Grossholz M, Becker M, Mentha G, De Peyer R, Terrier F. Choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis: diagnostic accuracy of MR cholangiopancreatography. Radiology 1997;205:523-30.
5. Reinhold C, Taourel P, Bret PM, Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Barkun AN et al. Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. Radiology 1998;209:435-42.
6. de Lédinghen V, Lecesne R, Raymond JM, Gense V, Amouretti M, Drouillard J et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: EUS or magnetic resonance cholangiography? A prospective controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:26-31.
7. Soto JA, Barish MA, Alvarez O, Medina S. Detection of choledocholithiasis with MR cholangiography: comparison of three-dimensional fast spin-echo and single and multisection half-Fourier rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequences. Radiology 2000;215:737-45.
8. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel K, Fried R, Zuber M, Harder F. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg 2000;135:148-52.
9. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JF, Jamart J, Geubel A, Pringot J et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2000;32:3-9.
10. Brisbois D, Plomteux O, Nchimi A, Hock D, Dupont P, Delforge M et al. Value of MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis in symptomatic patients: one-year experience with a standardized high resolution breath-hold technique. JBR-BTR 2001;84:258-61.
11. Taylor ACF, Little AF, Hennessy OF, Banting SW, Smith PJ, Desmond PV. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for non invasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:17-22.
12. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws S, Vanbeckevoort D, Van Steenbergen W, Aerts R et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones disease. Br J Surg 2003;90:42-7.
13. Griffin N, Wastle ML, Dunn WK, Ryder SD, Beckingham IJ. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:809-13.
14. Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, Haber GB, Herman ME, Dorsher PJ et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996;335: 909-18.
15. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal P, Pelletier G, Fritsch J, Choury AD et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common bile duct lithiasis. Lancet 1996;347:75-9.
16. Sahai AU, Mauldin PD, Marsi V, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ. Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 1999;49:334-43.
17. Hintze RE, Adler A, Veltzke W, Abou-Rebyeh H, Hammerstingl R, Vogl T et al. Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograpny (ERCP). Endoscopy 1997;29:182-7.
18. Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A, Hares I, Cabriada JL, Bernal A et al. Role of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:422-8.
19. Canto MI, Chak A, Stellato T, Sivak MV. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:439-48.
20. Cotton PB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993;165:474-8.