The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications

Journal of Economic Theory

Volumn 145, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 603-638

  Dietrich, Franz ^a,b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Characterisation of possibility agendas; Judgment aggregation; Material implication; Subjunctive implication

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949489711     PISSN: 00220531     EISSN: 10957235     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jet.2007.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chapman B. Rational aggregation. Polit. Philos. Econ. 1 3 (2002) 337-354
2. Dietrich F. Judgment aggregation: (Im)possibility theorems. J. Econ. Theory 126 1 (2006) 286-298
3. Dietrich F. A generalised model of judgment aggregation. Soc. Choice Welfare 28 (2007) 529-565
4. Dietrich F. Aggregation theory and the relevance of some issues to others. Meteor Research Memorandum 07 002 (2006)
5. Dietrich F., and List C. Strategy-proof judgment aggregation. Econ. Philos. 23 (2007) 269-300
6. Dietrich F., and List C. Judgment aggregation by quota rules. J. Theoretical Politics 19 4 (2007) 391-424
7. Dietrich F., and List C. Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation. Soc. Choice Welfare 29 (2007) 19-33
8. Dietrich F., and List C. Judgment aggregation on restricted domains. Meteor Research Memorandum 06 033 (2006)
9. E. Dokow, R. Holzman, Aggregation of binary evaluations, Working Paper, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, 2005
10. Gärdenfors P. An Arrow-like theorem for voting with logical consequences. Econ. Philos. 22 2 (2006) 181-190
11. Konieczny S., and Pino-Perez R. Merging information under constraints: A logical framework. J. Logic Comput. 12 5 (2002) 773-808
12. Kornhauser L.A., and Sager L.G. Unpacking the court. Yale Law J. 96 1 (1986) 82-117
13. Lewis D. Counterfactuals (1973), Basil Blackwell, Oxford
14. List C. A model of path dependence in decisions over multiple propositions. Amer. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98 3 (2004) 495-513
15. List C., and Pettit P. Aggregating sets of judgments: An impossibility result. Econ. Philos. 18 (2002) 89-110
16. List C., and Pettit P. Aggregating sets of judgments: Two impossibility results compared. Synthese 140 1-2 (2004) 207-235
17. Mongin P. Factoring out the impossibility of logical aggregation. J. Econ. Theory 141 1 (2008) 100-113
18. K. Nehring, C. Puppe, Strategyproof social choice on single-peaked domains: Possibility, impossibility and the space between, Working Paper, Karlsruhe University, 2002
19. K. Nehring, C. Puppe, Consistent judgment aggregation: The truth-functional case, Soc. Choice Welfare, in press
20. K. Nehring, C. Puppe, The structure of strategy-proof social choice, part II: Non-dictatorship, anonymity and neutrality, Working Paper, Karlsruhe University, 2005
21. Pauly M., and van Hees M. Logical constraints on judgment aggregation. J. Philos. Logic 35 (2006) 569-585
22. Pettit P. Deliberative democracy and the discursive dilemma. Philosophical Issues 11 (2001) 268-299
23. Pigozzi G. Belief merging and the discursive dilemma: An argument-based account to paradoxes of judgment aggregation. Synthese 152 2 (2006) 285-298
24. Priest G. An Introduction to Non-Classical Logic (2001), Cambridge University Press
25. Stalnaker R. A theory of conditionals. In: Rescher N. (Ed). Studies in Logical Theory (1986), Blackwell, Oxford
26. van Hees M. The limits of epistemic democracy. Soc. Choice Welfare 28 (2007) 649-666