Judgment aggregation by quota rules: Majority voting generalized

Journal of Theoretical Politics

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 391-424

  Dietrich, Franz ^a   List, Christian ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collective rationality; Judgment aggregation; Path dependence; Quota rules; Simple , super and sub majority voting; Strategy proofness

Indexed keywords

EID: 34748886083     PISSN: 09516298     EISSN: 14603667     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0951629807080775     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Barber, S., J. Mass and A. Neme (1997) ' Voting under Constraints ', Journal of Economic Theory 76 (2). 298 - 321.
2. Craven, J. (1971) ' Majority Voting and Social Choice', Review of Economic Studies 38 (2). 265 - 7.
3. Dantzig, G.B. (2002) ' Linear Programming ', Operations Research 50 (1). 42 - 7.
4. Dietrich, F. (2006) ' Judgment Aggregation: (Im)possibility Theorems', Journal of Economic Theory 126 (1). 286 - 98.
5. Dietrich, F. (2007) ' A Generalised Model of Judgment Aggregation', Social Choice and Welfare 28 (4). 529 - 65.
6. Dietrich, F. and C. List (forthcoming a) 'Strategy-proof Judgment Aggregation', Economics and Philosophy.
7. Dietrich, F. and C. List (forthcoming b) 'Arrow's Theorem in Judgment Aggregation', Social Choice and Welfare.
8. Ferejohn, J. and D. Grether (1974) ' On a Class of Rational Social Decision Procedures ', Journal of Economic Theory 8 (4). 471 - 82.
9. Grdenfors, P. (2006) ' An Arrow-like Theorem for Voting with Logical Consequences', Economics and Philosophy 22 (2). 181 - 90.
10. Goodin, R.E. and C. List (2006) ' Special Majorities Rationalized ', British Journal of Political Science 36 (2). 213 - 41.
11. Konieczny, S. and R. Pino-Perez (2002) ' Merging Information under Constraints: A Logical Framework', Journal of Logic and Computation 12: 773 - 808.
12. List, C. (2001) ' Mission Impossible? The Problem of Democratic Aggregation in the Face of Arrow's Theorem'. DPhil thesis, University of Oxford.
13. List, C. (2003) ' A Possibility Theorem on Aggregation over Multiple Interconnected Propositions', Mathematical Social Sciences 45 (1). 1 - 13 (with corrigendum in Mathematical Social Sciences 52: 109 - 10 ).
14. List, C. (2004) ' A Model of Path Dependence in Decisions over Multiple Propositions', American Political Science Review 98 (3). 495 - 513.
15. List, C. and P. Pettit (2002) ' Aggregating Sets of Judgments: An Impossibility Result ', Economics and Philosophy 18: 89 - 110.
16. List, C. and P. Pettit (2004) ' Aggregating Sets of Judgments: Two Impossibility Results Compared', Synthese 140 (1 - 2). 207 - 35.
17. Nehring, K. and C. Puppe (2002) ' Strategyproof Social Choice on Single-peaked Domains: Possibility, Impossibility and the Space Between ', Working paper, University of California at Davies.
18. Nehring, K. and C. Puppe (2005) ' Consistent Judgement Aggregation: A Characterization', Working paper, University of Karlsruhe.
19. Pauly, M. and M. van Hees (2006) ' Logical Constraints on Judgment Aggregation', Journal of Philosophical Logic 35: 569 - 85.
20. Pettit, P. (2001) ' Deliberative Democracy and the Discursive Dilemma', Philosophical Issues 11: 268 - 99.
21. Pigozzi, G. (2006) ' Belief Merging and the Discursive Dilemma: An Argument-based Account to Paradoxes of Judgment Aggregation', Synthese 152 (2). 285 - 98.
22. Rubinstein, A. and P. Fishburn (1986) ' Algebraic Aggregation Theory ', Journal of Economic Theory 38: 63 - 77.
23. van Hees, M. (2007) ' The Limits of Epistemic Democracy', Social Choice and Welfare 28 (4). 649 - 66.
24. Vermeule, A. (2005) ' Submajority Rules: Forcing Accountability upon Majorities', Journal of Political Philosophy 13: 74 - 98.
25. Wilson, R. (1975) ' On the Theory of Aggregation', Journal of Economic Theory 10: 89 - 99.