Mild stimulation in assisted reproduction

Gynecological Endocrinology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 261-264

  Barri, Pedro N ^a   Tur, Rosa ^a   Martinez, Francisca ^a   Coroleu, Buenaventura ^a  

^a INSTITUT UNIVERSITARI DEXEUS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Assisted reproduction; Friendly IVF; IVF; Mild stimulation; Ovarian simulation protocols

Indexed keywords

GONADOTROPIN;

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLICULAR ASPIRATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; OVARY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULATION;

AGE FACTORS; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; EMBRYO IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; FOLLICULAR PHASE; GONADOTROPINS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; OOCYTE RETRIEVAL; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 77949459620     PISSN: 09513590     EISSN: 14730766     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09513590903511489     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after reimplantation of a human embryo. Lancet 1978;2:366.
2. Barri PN, Coroleu B, Martinez F. Stimulation protocols for poor responders and aged women. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000;166:15-20.
3. Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Macklon N, Heijnen EMEW, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of low response to mild ovarian stimulation initiated on cycle day 5 for IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1919-1924.
4. Heijnen EM, Eijkemans MJ, De Klerk C, Polinder S, Beckers NG, Klinkert ER, Broekmans FJ, Passchier J, Te Velde ER, Macklon NS, Fauser BC. A mild treatment strategy for in-vitro fertilisation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2007 Mar 3;369(9563):743-749. PubMed PMID: 17336650.
5. Pennings G, Ombelet W. Coming soon to your clinic: patientfriendly IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2075-2079.
6. Flisser, et al. Patient friendly IVF: how should it be defined? Fertil Steril 2007;88:547-549.
7. Nygren KG. Single embryo transfer: the role of natural cycle/ minimal stimulation IVF in the future. RBM Online 2007;14:55.
8. Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Macklon NS, Heijnen EMW, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of ongoing pregnancy after single-embryo transfer following mild stimulation for IVF. Fertil Steril 2008;89:1159-1165.
9. Polinder S, Heijnen EMEW, Macklon NS, Habbema JDF, Fauser BJCM, Eijkemans MJC. Cost-effectiveness of a mild compared with a standard strategy for IVF: a randomized comparison using cumulative term live birth as the primary endpoint. Hum Reprod 2007;23:316-323.
10. Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ, Van Opstal D, Beckers GM, Verhoeff A, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM. Milder stimulation for in vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2007;22:980-988.
11. Katz P, Nachtigall R, Showstack J. The economic impact of the assisted reproductive technologies. Nat Cell Biol 2002;4:S29-S32.
12. Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil Steril 2006;85:871-875.
13. Hohmann FP, Macklon NS, Fauser BCJM. A randomized comparison of two ovarian stimulation protocols with GnRH antagonist cotreatment for IVF commencing rec-FSH on cycle day 2 or 5 with the standard long GnRH agonist protocol. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88: 166-173.
14. Verberg MFG, Eijkemans MJC, Macklon NS, Heijnen EMEW, Fauser BCJM, Broekmans FJ. Predictors of low ovarian response to mild stimulation initiated on cycle day 5 for IVF. Hum Reprod 2007;22:1919-1924.
15. Pelinck MJ, Vogel NEA, Arts EGJM, Simons AHM, Heineman MJ, Hock A. Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study. Hum Reprod 2007;22:2463-12270
16. International Committee for Monitoring ART (ICMART). World collaborative report on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 2006;85:1586-1622.