Determining the important environmental variables controlling plant species community composition in mesotrophic grasslands in Great Britain

Applied Vegetation Science

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 459-471

  Kalusová, Veronika ^a,b   Le Duc Michael, G ^a   Gilbert Joanne, C ^c,d   Lawson Clare, S ^c,e   Gowing David, J G ^c,f   Marrs Rob, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b MASARYK UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^f OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Curves; Environmental gradients; HOF (Huisman, Olff Fresco) modelling; Realized niche; Species response; Variation partitioning

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949436313     PISSN: 14022001     EISSN: 1654109X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2009.01041.x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anon. 1995a. Biodiversity UK steering group report vol I. Action plans. HMSO, London, UK.
2. Anon. 1995b. Biodiversity UK steering group report vol II. Meeting the Rio challenge. HMSO, London, UK.
3. Anon. 2001. UK biodiversity action plan: action plan for lowland meadows. HMSO, London, UK.
4. Anon (R Development Core Team.) 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.r-project.org (accessed 20 January 2004).
5. Austin, M.P., Nicholls, A.O. & Margules, CR. 1990. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niche of five Eucalyptus species. Ecological Monographs 60: 161-177.
6. Blackstock, T.H., Rimes, CA., Stevens, D.P., Jefferson, R.G., Robertson, HJ., McIntosh, J. & Hopkins, J.J. 1999. The extent of semi-natural, grasslands in lowland England and Wales: a review of conservation surveys 1978-96. Grass and Forage Science 54: 1-18.
7. Borcard, D., Legendre, P. & Drapeau, P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045-1055.
8. Corney, P.M., Le Duc, M.G., Smart S, M., Kirby, K.J., Bunce, R.G.H, & Marrs, R.H. 2006. Relationships between the species composition of forest field-layer vegetation and. environmental drivers assessed using a national scale survey. Journal of Ecology 94: 383-401.
9. Critchley, C.N.R., Chambers, BJ., Fowbert, J.A., Bhogal, A., Rose, S.C. & Anderson, R.A. 2002a. Plant species richness, functional type and soil properties of grasslands and allied vegetation in English environmentally sensitive areas. Grass and Forage Science 57: 82-92.
10. Critchley, C.N.R., Chambers, BJ., Fowbert, J.A, Sanderson, R.A., Bhogal, A. & Rose, S.C. 2002b. Association between lowland grassland plant communities and soil properties. Biological Conservation 105: 199-215.
11. Duffey, E., Morris, M.G., Sheail, J., Ward, L.K., Wells, D.A. & Wells, T.C.E. 1974. Grassland ecology and wildlife management. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
12. Ejrnæs, R. & Bruun, H.H. 2000. Gradient analysis of dry grassland vegetation in Denmark, Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 573-584.
13. Etherington, J.R. 1975. Environment and plant ecology. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
14. Gilbert, J. 2000 High soil phosphorus availability and the restoration of species-rich grassland. PhD thesis, Cranfield University, Silsoe, UK.
15. Gilbert, J.C., Gowing, D.J.G. & Bullock, R.J. 2003. Influence of seed mixture and hydrological regime on the establishment of a diverse grassland sward at a site with high phosphorus availability. Restoration Ecology 11: 424-435.
16. Grace, J.B. 1999. The factors controlling species density in herbaceous plant communities: an assessment. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 2: 1-28.
17. Grace, J.B. & Pugesek, B.H, 1.997. A. structural model of plant species richness and its application to a coastal wetland, American Naturalist 149: 436-460.
18. Gustavsson, E., Lennartsson, T. & Emanuelsson, M. 2007. Land use more than 200 years ago explains current grassland plant diversity in a Swedish agricultural landscape. Biological Conservation 138:47-59.
19. Havlová, M., Chytrý, M. & Tichý, L. 2004. Diversity of hay meadows in the Czech Republic: major types and environmental gradients. Phytocoenologia 34: 551-567.
20. Heikkinen, R.K. 1996. Predicting patterns of vascular plant species richness with composite variables: a meso-scale study in Finnish Lapland. Vegetatio 126: 151-165.
21. Hill, M.O., Mountford, J.O., Roy, D.B. & Buňce, R.G.H. 1999. Ellenberg's indicator values for British plants: Ecofact vol2 technical annex. HMSO, Norwich, UK.
22. Huisman, J., Olff, H. & Fresco, L.F.M. 1993. A hierarchical set of model for species response analysis. Journal of Vegetation Science 4: 37-46.
23. Janssens, F., Peeters, A., Tallowin, J.R.B., Bakker, J.P., Bekker, R.M., Fillat, F. & Oomes, M.J. M. 1998. Relationship between soil chemical factors and grassland diversity. Plant and Soil 202: 69-78.
24. Kalusová, V. 2008 Factors affecting plant community composition in mesotrophic grassland in the UK. BSc thesis, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
25. Klimek, S., Kemmermann, A.R., Hofmann, M. & Isselstein, J. 2007. Plant species richness and composition in managed, grasslands: The relative importance of field management and environmental factors. Biological Conservation 134: 559-570.
26. Lawesson, J.E. & Oksanen, J. 2002. Niche characteristics of Danish woody species as derived from coenoclines. Journal of Vegetation Science 13: 279-290.
27. Legendre, P. & Gallagher, E.D. 2001. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129: 271-280.
28. Loreau, M., Neem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D. & Wardle, D.A. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804-808.
29. Lyons, G. & Ausden, M. 2005. Raising water levels to revert arable land to grazing marsh at Berney Marshes RSPB Reserve, Norfolk, England. Conservation Evidence 2: 47-49.
30. MAFF 1986. ADAS reference book 427: The analysis of agricultural materials. HMSO, London, UK.
31. Malloch, A.J.C. 1995. Match version 2. A computer program to aid the assignment of vegetation data to the communities and subcommunities of the national vegetation classification. University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK,
32. Marini, L., Scotton, M., Klimek, S., Isselstein, J. & Pecile, A. 2007. Effects of local factors on plant species richness and composition of Alpine meadows. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 119: 281-288.
33. Marrs, R.H. 1993. Soil fertility and nature conservation in Europe: theoretical considerations and practical, management solutions. Advances in Ecological Research 24: 241-300.
34. Marrs, R.H., Grace, J.B. & Gough, L. 1996. On the relationship between plant species diversity and biomass. Oikos 75: 323-326.
35. Mittelbach, G.G., Steiner, CF., Schemer, S.M., Gross, K.L., Reynolds, H.L., Waide, R.B., Willig, M.R., Dodson, S.I. & Gough, L. 2001. What is the observed relationship between species richness and productivity? Ecology 82: 2381-2396.
36. Oksanen, J. 2004 Gradient Analysis of Vegetation (gravy) software, version 0.0-21. http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/softhelp/softalist.html (accessed 31 January 2005).
37. Oksanen, J. 2005 Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Communities in R: vegan tutorial, version 1.6-10 for Windows, http://cc.oulu.fi/~jarioksa/so. fthelp/vegan. html (accessed 31 December 2005).
38. Oksanen, J. & Minchin, P.R. 2002. Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients? Ecological Modelling 157: 119-129.
39. Olila, O.G. & Reddy, K.R. 1997. Influence of redox potential on phosphorus uptake by sediments in two sub-tropical eutrophic lakes. Hydrobiologia 345:45-57.
40. O'Sullivan, A.N. 1968. The lowland grasslands (MolinioArrhenatheretea) of County Limerick. Irish vegetation studies, 2. An Foran Talúntais, Dublin, IE.
41. Peres-Neto, P.R., Legendre, P., Dray, S. & Borcard, D. 2006. Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87: 2614-2625.
42. Press, M.C. & Graves, J.D. 1995. Parasitic plants. Chapman & Hall, London, UK.
43. Rodwell, J.S. 1992. British plant communities, vol 3 grasslands and montane communities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
44. Rodwell, J.S. 2000. British plant communities, vol 5 maritime communities and vegetation of open habitats. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
45. Rodwell, J.S., Dring, J.C., Averis, A.B.G., Protor, M.C.F., Malloch, A.J.C., Schaminée, J.H.J. & Dargie, T.C.D. (2000). Review of coverage of the national vegetation classification. JNCC report No. 302. JNCC, Peterborough, UK.
46. Roem, W.J. & Berendse, F. 2000. Soil acidity and nutrient supply ratio as possible factors determining changes in plant species diversity in grassland and heathland communities. Biological Conservation 92: 151-161.
47. Schaffers, A.P. & Sýkora, K.V. 2000. Reliability of Ellenberg indicator values for moisture, nitrogen and soil reaction: a comparison with field measurements. Journal of Vegetation Science 11: 225-244.
48. Schaminée, J.H.J., Weeda, E.J. & Westhoff, V. 1996. De Vegetatie van Nederland, 3. Opulus Press, Uppsala, SE.
49. Silvertown, J., Dodd, M. & Gowing, D. 2001. Phylogeny and the niche structure of meadow plant communities. Journal of Ecology 89:428-435.
50. Smith, R.S. & Rushton, S.P. 1994. The effects of grazing management on the vegetation of mesotrophic (meadow) grassland in Northern England. Journal of Applied Ecology 31: 13-24.
51. Smith, R.S., Shiel, R.S., Millward, D. & Corkhill, P. 2000. The interactive effects of management on the productivity and plant community structure of an upland meadow: an 8-year field trial. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 1029-1043.
52. Stace, CA. 1997. New Flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
53. StatSoft Inc. 2004. Statistica Cz, v. 7.1. http://www. StatSoft.cz (accessed 1 October 2007).
54. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1988. Partial canonical correspondence analysis. In: Bock, HH (ed.) Classification and related methods of data analysis, pp. 551-558. North-Holland, Amsterdam, NL.
55. ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P, 2005. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide. Software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4.5). Biometris, Wageningen & Č esk é Budijovice, CZ.
56. Wallace, M.V., Rodwell, J.S., Mountford, J.O. & Spoor, G. 2002. The water-regime requirements and the response to hydrological change of grassland plant communities. Final report to DEFRA, Project BD1310. DEFRA, London, UK.
57. Wells, T.C.E., Sheail, J., Ball, D.F. & Ward, L.K. 1976. Ecological studies on the Porton Ranges: relationships between vegetation, soils and land-use history. Journal of Ecology 64: 589-626.
58. Wild, A. 1988. Russell's soil conditions and plant growth. 11th edn. Longman, London, UK.