The Italian version of the Mayo-Portland adaptability inventory-4. A new measure of brain injury outcome

European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 513-519

  Cattelani, R ^a   Corsini, D ^b   Posteraro, L ^c   Agosti, M ^b   Saccavini, M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF PARMA   (Italy)

^c Suzzara Hospital   (Italy)

Author keywords

Brain injuries; Social adjustment; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOCIAL ADAPTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN INJURIES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949374638     PISSN: 19739087     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. World Health Organization (WHO). ICIDH-2: International classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation. A manual of dimensions for disablement and functioning. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 1997.
2. Malec JF, Moessner AM, Kragness M, Lezak MD. Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict postacute rehabilitation outcome: Rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2000;15:670-82.
3. Johnston MV, Shawaryn MA, Malec J, Kreutzer J, Hammond FM. The structure of functional and community outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2006;20:391-407.
4. Rappaport M, Hall KM, Hopkins K, Bellesa T. Disability rating scale for severe head trauma: coma to community. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1982;63:118-23.
5. Boake C. Supervision Rating Scale: a measure of functional outcome from brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:765-72.
6. Wilson L, Pettigrew L, Teasdale G. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:573-85.
7. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, Gordon WA, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:75-87.
8. Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The Community Integration Questionnaire: a comparative examination. Amer J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:103-11.
9. Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of Community Integration Questionnaire studies. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997;12:74-91.
10. Hall KM, Mann N, High WM, Wright J, Kreutzer JS, Wood D. Functional measures after traumatic brain injury: ceiling effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQ. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1996;11:27-39.
11. Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazazi B, Wright J, Cantagallo A. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measure for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:367-74.
12. Cantagallo A, Maietti A, Hall KM, Bushnik T. Comparison among functional outcome measures for traumatic brain injury assessment in the Italian community. Europa Medicophysica 2000;36:171-82.
13. Lezak MD. Relationships between personality disorders, social disturbances and physical disability following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1987;2:57-69.
14. Malec JF, Thompson JM. Relationship of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory to functional outcome and cognitive performance measures. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1994;9:1-15.
15. Bohac DL, Malec JF, Moessner AM. Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: structure and validity. Brain Injury 1997;11:469-82.
16. Malec JF, Kragness M, Evans RW, Finlay KL, Kent A, Lezak MD. Further psychometric evaluation and revision of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in a national sample. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2003;18:479-92.
17. Malec JF. Comparability of Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory ratings by staff, significant others and people with acquired brain injury. Brain Injury 2004;18:563-75.
18. Malec JF, Buffington ALH, Moessner AM, Degiorgio L. A medical/vocational case coordination system for persons with brain injury: an evaluation of employment outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:1007-15.
19. Malec JF. Impact of comprehensive day treatment on societal participation for persons with acquired brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:885-94.
20. Malec JF, Degiorgio L. Characteristics of successful and unsuccessful completers of three postacute brain injury rehabilitation pathways. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:1759-64.
21. Malec JF, Machulda MM, Moessner AM. Differing problem perceptions of staff, survivors, and significant others after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1997;12:1-13.
22. Murrey GJ, Hale FM, Williams JD. Assessment of anosognosia in persons with frontal lobe damage: clinical utility of the Mayo-Portland AdaptabUity Inventory (MPAI). Brain Injury 2005;19:599-603.
23. Oddson B, Rumney P, Johnson P, Thomas-Stonell N. Clinical use of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory in rehabilitation after paediatric acquired brain injury. Devel Med Child Neurol 2006;48:918-22.
24. Malec J. The Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory. The Center for Outcome Measurement in Brain Injury (COMBI) 2005. [cited 2009 October 9]. Available at: http://www.tbims.org/combi/mpai.
25. Lombardi F, Orsi M, Mammi P, Brianti R, Mazzucchi A. Validità del Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) e dati normativi per l'Italia. Giornale It Med Riabil 1997;1:23-34.