The structure of functional and community outcomes following traumatic brain injury

Brain Injury

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 391-407

  Johnston, Mark V ^a   Shawaryn, Marla A ^a   Malec, James ^b   Kreutzer, Jeffrey ^c   Hammond, Flora M ^d  

^a RUTGERS NEW JERSEY MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Charlotte Inst of Rehabilitation   (United States)

Author keywords

Community participation; Measurement; Outcomes; Psychometrics; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT; DATA BASE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PSYCHOMETRY; RASCH ANALYSIS; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744815395     PISSN: 02699052     EISSN: 1362301X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02699050500487795     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Johnston, MV and Hall, K and Carnevale, G and Boake, C.(1996) Functional assessment and outcome evaluation in TBI rehabilitation. In Medical rehabilitation of traumatic brain injury. (pp. 197-226). Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus.
2. Graham, DI.(1999) Pathophysiological aspects of injury and mechanisms of recovery. In Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury,3rd ed. (pp. 19-41). Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
3. Rizzo, M and Tranel, D.(1996) Overview of head injury and postconcussive syndrome. In Head injury and postconcussive syndrome. (pp. 1-18). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
4. McKinlay, WW and Watkiss, AJ.(1999) Cognitive and behavioral effects of brain injury. In Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury,3rd ed. (pp. 74-86). Philadelphia: FA Davis.
5. Groher, ME and Pichon-Nieto, L.(1999) Evaluation of communication and swallowing disorders. In Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury,3rd ed. (pp. 183-198). Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
6. Witol, AD and Kreutzer, JS and Sander, AM.(1999) Emotional, behavioral, and personality assessment following traumatic brain injury. In Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury,3rd ed. (pp. 167-182). Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
7. Dodwell, D. (1988) The heterogeneity of social outcome following head injury Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 51, pp. 833-838.
8. Brown, SA and McCauley, SR and Levin, HS and Boake, C and Goldfader, PR and McCormick, SD and Rockers, D and Butters, M and Kareken, DA and Gostnell, D and Clifton, GL. (2001) Factor analysis of an outcome interview for use in clinical trials of traumatically brain-injured patients: A preliminary study American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 80, pp. 196-205.
9. Teasdale, GM and Pettigrew, LE and Wilson, JT and Murray, G and Jennett, B. (1998) Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: A review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale Journal of Neurotrauma, 15, pp. 587-597.
10. Gouvier, WD and Blanton, PD and LaPorte, KK and Nepomeceno, C. (1987) Reliability and validity of the Disability Rating Scale and the Levels of Cognitive Functioning Scale in monitoring recovery from severe head injury Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 68, pp. 94-97.
11. Rappaport, M and Hall, KM and Hopkins, HK and Belleza, T and Cope, DN. (1982) Disability Rating Scale for severe head trauma: Coma to community Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 63, pp. 118-123.
12. Malec, JF and Moessner, AM and Kragness, M and Lezak, MD. (2000) Refining a measure of brain injury sequelae to predict postacute rehabilitation outcome: Rating scale analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15, pp. 670-682.
13. Bohac, DL and Malec, JF and Moessner, AM. (1997) Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: Structure and validity Brain Injury, 11, pp. 469-482.
14. Haffey, WJ and Johnston, MV.(1990) A functional assessment system for real world rehabiliation outcomes. In The neuropsychology of everyday life: Assessment and basic competencies. (pp. 99-124). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
15. Willer, B and Rosenthal, M and Kreutzer, JS and Gordon, WA and Rempel, R. (1993) Assessment of community integration following traumatic brain injury Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, pp. 75-87.
16. Kreutzer, JS and Marwitz, JH and Seel, R and Serio, C. (1996) Validation of a neurobehavioral functioning inventory for adults with traumatic brain injury Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 77, pp. 116-124.
17. Corrigan, JD and Smith-Knapp, K and Granger, CV. (1997) Validity of the functional independence measure for persons with traumatic brain injury Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 78, pp. 828-834.
18. Boake, C and High, WM Jr. (1996) Functional outcome from traumatic brain injury: Unidimensional or multidimensional? American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 75, pp. 105-113.
19. Findler, M and Cantor, J and Haddad, L and Gordon, W and Ashman, T. (2001) The reliability and validity of the SF-36 health survey questionnaire for use with individuals with traumatic brain injury Brain Injury, 15, pp. 715-723.
20. Riemsma, RP and Forbes, CA and Glanville, JM and Eastwood, AJ and Kleijnen, J. (2001) General health status measures for people with cognitive impairment: Learning disability and acquired brain injury Health Technology Assessment, 5, pp. 1-100.
21. Dikmen, S and Machamer, J and Miller, B and Doctor, J and Temkin, N. (2001) Functional status examination: A new instrument for assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury Journal of Neurotrauma, 18, pp. 127-140.
22. Putnam, SH and Fichtenberg, NL.(1999) Neuropsychological examination of the patient with traumatic brain injury. In Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury, 3rd ed. (pp. 147-166). Philadelphia: FA Davis Company.
23. Hanks, RA and Temkin, N and Machamer, J and Dikmen, SS. (1999) Emotional and behavioral adjustment after traumatic brain injury Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 80, pp. 991-997.
24. Palav, A and Ortega, A and McCaffrey, RJ. (2001) Incremental validity of the MMPI-2 Content Scales: A preliminary study with brain-injured patients Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, pp. 275-283.
25. Sliwinski, M and Gordon, WA and Bogdany, J. (1998) The Beck Depression Inventory: Is it a suitable measure of depression for individuals with traumatic brain injury? Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 13, pp. 40-46.
26. Johnston, MV and Keith, RA and Hinderer, S. (1992) Measurement standards for interdisciplinary medical rehabilitation Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 73, pp. S6-S23.
27. Streiner, DL and Norman, GR.(1995) Health measurement scales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Bond, TG and Fox, CM.(2001) Applying the rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Allen, MJ and Wendy, MY.(1979) Introduction to measurement theory. Monterey CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing, CA.
30. Anderson, SI and Housley, AM and Jones, PA and Slattery, J and Miller, JD. (1993) Glasgow Outcome Scale: An inter-rater reliability study Brain Injury, 7, pp. 309-317.
31. Conzen, M and Ebel, H and Swart, E and Skreczek, W and Dette, M and Oppel, F. (1992) Long-term neuropsychological outcome after severe head injury with good recovery Brain Injury, 6, pp. 45-52.
32. Teasdale, GM and Pettigrew, LE and Wilson, JT and Murray, G and Jennett, B. (1998) Analyzing outcome of treatment of severe head injury: A review and update on advancing the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale Journal of Neurotrauma, 15, pp. 587-597.
33. Traumatic Brain Injury National Data Center. Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Syllabus, Fall 2000. West Orange NJ: Kessler Medical Rehabilitation Research and Education Corp. Traumatic Brain Injury National Data Center; Fall 2000. Available online at:, 27 March 2006
34. Boake, C. (1996) Supervision rating scale: A measure of functional outcome from brain injury Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 77, pp. 765-772.
35. World Health Organization.(2001) International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization.
36. Linacre, JM.(2001) Winsteps 3.30. Chicago: MESA Press.
37. Wright, BD.(1996) A unidimensionality coefficient. In Rasch measurement transactions. Part 2. (pp. 385). Chicago: MESA Press.
38. Bowling, A.(2001) Measuring disease: A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales, 2nd ed. Buckingham UK: Open University Press.
39. World Health Organization.(2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO.
40. Powell, JH and Beckers, K and Greenwood, RJ. (1998) Measuring progress and outcome in community rehabilitation after brain injury with a new assessment instrument-the BICRO-39 scales. Brain Injury Community Rehabilitation Outcome Archives of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 79, pp. 1213-1225.
41. Turner-Stokes, L. (1999) Outcome measurement in brain injury rehabilitation-towards a common language Clinical Rehabilitation, 13(4), pp. 273-275.
42. Carney, N and Chesnut, RM and Maynard, H and Mann, NC and Patterson, P and Helfand, M. (1999) Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: A systematic review Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14, pp. 277-307.
43. Wade, DT. (2001) Research into rehabilitation What is the priority? Clinical Rehabilitation, 15, pp. 229-232.
44. Johnston, MV and Lewis, FD. (1991) The outcomes of community re-entry programs for brain injury survivors. Part 1: Independent living and productive activities Brain Injury, 5, pp. 141-154.
45. Fisher, AG.(1999) Assessment of motor and process skills, 3rd ed. Fort Collins CO: Three Star Press.