Reply to discussants on "the need for restricting the probabilistic analysis in risk assessments to variability": Response

Risk Analysis

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 381-384

  Aven, Terje ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949355611     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01363.x     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Lindley DV. The philosophy of statistics. Statistician, 2000 49 (3 293 337.
2. Aven T. Some reflections on uncertainty analysis and management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2010 95 : 195 201.
3. Aven T. On the need for restricting the probabilistic analysis in risk assessments to variability. Risk Analysis, 2010 30 (3 354-360.
4. Singpurwalla ND. Reliability and Risk: A Bayesian Perspective. Chichester : Wiley, 2006.
5. Ferson S, Ginzburg LR. Different methods are needed to propagate ignorance and variability. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996 54 (2-3 133 144.
6. Haimes YY. Risk Modelling, Assessment and Management, 2nd ed. New York : Wiley, 2004.
7. Aven T. Misconceptions of Risk. Chichester : Wiley, 2010.
8. Aven T, Heide B. Reliability and validity of risk analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2009 94 : 1862 1868.