Strategic responses by a nonprofit when a donor becomes tainted

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 102-123

  Dunn, Paul ^a  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Nonprofit organizations; Stakeholder theory; Strategy; Theoretical development

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949345952     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764008326770     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams, L.J. (2005, October 5). Mexican church gets donations from drug dealers. The Guardian. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from www.religionnewsblog.com/12384.
2. Agle, B., Mitchell, R., & Sonnenfeld, J. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 507-525.
3. Associated Press. (2002, December 23). Donor disgrace puts squeeze on schools. Received December 16, 2005, from http://archives.cnn.com/2002/EDUCATION/12/23/donor.dilemma.ap/.
4. Augsburg College. (2005). Scholastic Connections. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from www.augburg.edu/connections/.
5. Austin, J. (2000). Strategic collaboration between nonprofits and businesses. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 69-97.
6. BBC. (2002, September 30). Language group's U-turn on abuse cash. BBC News. Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/2287858.stm.
7. Chernow, R. (1998). Titan: The life of John D. Rockefeller, Sr. New York: Random House.
8. Etzioni, A. (1964). Modern organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
10. Freeman, R. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 409-421.
11. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191-205.
12. Frumkin, P., & Kim, M. (2001). Strategic positioning and the financing of nonprofit organizations: Is efficiency rewarded in the contributions marketplace? Public Administration Review, 61, 266-289.
13. Gago, R., & Antolin, M. (2004). Stakeholder salience in corporate environmental strategy. Corporate Governance, 4, 65-76.
14. Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Social organization of an urban grants economy: A study of business philanthropy and nonprofit organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15. Greening, D., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 467-498.
16. Harrison, B.J. (2001). Tainted money? Fund Raising Management, 32, 34-37.
17. Herman, R., & Renz, D. (2004). Doing things right: Effectiveness in local nonprofit organizations, a panel study. Public Administration Review, 64, 694-704.
18. Jaschik, S. (2005, May 31). Tainted gift at Washington and Jefferson. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved February 27, 2006, from www.insidehighered.com/news/2005/05/31/vilar.
19. Jeffrey, N. (2000, January 7). Philanthropy: Scandals don't erase names cast in stone-Good deeds outweigh the bad as long as the check clears: Institutions see no evil. Wall Street Journal, p. W10.
20. Jones, T. (2005). Universities squirm after donations linked to corporate criminals. Common Dreams News Center. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/0321-03.htm.
21. King, N. (2004). Social capital and nonprofit leaders. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 14, 471-486.
22. Kochan, T., & Rubinstein, S. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn project. Organization Science, 11, 367-386.
23. MacMahon, P. (2005, November 30). Pay us back donation from dictator, Malawians tell Scots medics' college. The Scotsman. Retrieved December 15, 2005, from http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1356.
24. McElhinney, D., & Proctor, T. (2005). Concept of entrapment and decision-making. Management Decision, 43, 189-202.
25. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principles of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
26. Moore, M. (2000). Managing for value: Organizational strategy in for-profit, nonprofit, and governmental organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29, 183-204.
27. National Philanthropic Trust. (2007). Philanthropy Statistics. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.nptrust.org/philanthropy/philanthropy_stats.asp.
28. Nutt, P. (1999). Public-private differences and the assessment of alternatives for decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 9, 305-349.
29. Nutt, P. (2006). Comparing public and private sector decision-making practices. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 289-318.
30. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional pressures. Academy of Management Review, 16, 145-179.
31. Parent, M.M., & Deephouse, D.L. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 1-23.
32. Peek, A. (2004, September 15). Divinity school rejects Arab funding. The Citizen. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.ksgcitizen.org/media/paper223/news/2004/09/15/Features/Divinity.School.Rejects.Arab.Funding-889966.shtml?norewriteandsourcedomain=www.ksgcitizen.org.
33. Perry, J., & Rainey, H. (1988). The public-private distinction in organizational theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13, 182-201.
34. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
35. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependency perspective. New York: Harper & Row.
36. Platt, T. (2004, March 1). The racist money-bags behind Sacramento State University. Sacramento Bee. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from http://hnn.us/articles/3770.html.
37. Pogrebin, R. (2008, March 11). A $100 million donation to the N.Y. public library. New York Times. Retrieved March 13, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/11/arts/design/11expa.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1206827075-hY1n27IQmPoHlJxXx80Ucw&oref=slogin.
38. Queen's Press Release. (2005, September 21). Queen's statement about Radler gift. Retrieved October 5, 2005, from http://qnc.queensu.ca/story_loader.php?id=4331ade32a459.
39. Rodrigues, S., & Hickson, D. (1995). Success in decision making: Different organizations, different reasons for success. Journal of Management Studies, 32, 655-679.
40. Salancik, G. (1977). Commitment is too easy. Organizational Dynamics, 6, 62-80.
41. Schackner, B. (2005, June 5). Philanthropy carries a whiff of scandal: College feels awkward when donors run afoul of the law. Post-Gazette.com. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from www.post-gazette.com/pg/05156/516074.stm.
42. Schaefer, A. (2001). To accept or not to accept, that may be the question: A guide for dealing with tainted money. Nonprofit World, 19, 9-11.
43. Scherer, Ron. (2002, October 9). Buildings donated by corrupt CEOs face name shame. Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from www.csmonitor.com/2002/1009/p01s01-ussc.htm.
44. Schwenk, C. (1990). Conflict in organizational decision making: An exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. Management Science, 36, 436-448.
45. Skapinker, M. (2002, November 16). Tainted money and ivory towers. Financial Times, p. 10.
46. Staw, B. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
47. Thomas, A. (1996). Rhodes. London: BBC Worldwide Limited.
48. Tschirhart, M. (1996). Artful leadership: Managing stakeholder problems in nonprofit arts organizations. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
49. USA Today. (2005, November 24). College removes name of Wal-Mart heiress on arena. Retrieved December 16, 2005, from www.usatoday.com/money/industries/retail/2004-11-24-walmart-heiress-arena_x.htm.
50. Voss, G., Cable, D., & Voss, Z. (2000). Linking organizational values to relationships with external constituents: A study of nonprofit professional theatres. Organization Science, 11, 330-347.
51. Waldie, P. (2005, September 22). Queen's stripping Radler's name from business wing. Globe and Mail, p. A1.
52. Willen, L. (2005, July 20). Kozlowski's crime pays at alma mater, where name stays on hall. Bloomberg.comRetrieved January 16, 2006, from www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000103andsid=aViu1Vf.0HVAandrefer=us.