How to take skepticism seriously

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 148, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 39-60

  Leite, Adam ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949315541     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-010-9502-7     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Bonjour, L. (1985). The structure of epistemic justification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Bonjour, L., & Sosa, E. (2003). Epistemic justification: Internalism vs. externalism, foundations vs. virtues. Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Byrne, A. (2004). How hard are the sceptical paradoxes? Noûs, 38, 299-325.
4. Chisholm, R. M. (1989). Theory of knowledge (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
5. Cohen, S. (1984). Justification and truth. Philosophical Studies, 46(1984), 279-296.
6. Cohen, S. (2002). Basic knowledge and the problem of easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 65(2), 309-329.
7. Cohen, S. (2005). Why basic knowledge is easy knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 70(2), 417-430.
8. Cohen, S., & Lehrer, K. (1983). Justification, truth, and knowledge. Synthese, 55, 191-207.
9. David, M., & Warfield, T. (2008). Knowledge-closure and skepticism. In Q. Smith (Ed.), Epistemology: New essays. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10. DeRose, K. (1995). Solving the skeptical problem. The Philosophical Review, 104, 1-52.
11. Foley, R. (1987). The theory of epistemic rationality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Goldman, A. (1999). Internalism exposed. Journal of Philosophy, 96(6), 271-293.
13. Leite, A. (2008). Believing one's reasons are good. Synthese, 161(3), 419-441.
14. Leite, A. (forthcoming1). Austin, dreams, and skepticism. In: R. Sorli & M. Gustafsson (Eds.), New essays on the philosophy of J. L. Austin. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
15. Leite, A. (forthcoming2). Immediate warrant, epistemic responsibility, and moorean dogmatism. In A. Reisner & A. Steglich-Petersen (Eds.), Reasons for belief.
16. Maddy, P. (2007). Second philosophy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Moore, G. E. (1993). Proof of an external world. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), G. E. Moore: Selected writings. London: Routledge.
18. Neta, R. (2002). S knows that p. Noûs, 36, 4, 663-4, 681.
19. Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Pritchard, D. (2005). Epistemic luck. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
21. Pryor, J. (2000). The skeptic and the dogmatist. Noûs, 34, 517-549.
22. Pryor, J. (2004). What's wrong with Moore's argument. Philosophical Issues (a supplement to Nous), 14, 349-378.
23. Pryor, J. (forthcoming). When warrant transmits. In: A. Coliva (Ed.), Wittgenstein, epistemology and mind: Themes from the philosophy of Crispin Wright. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
24. Sosa, E. (2007). A virtue epistemology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
25. Sosa, E. (2009). Reflective knowledge. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Stroud, B. (1984). Significance of philosophical scepticism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
27. Stroud, B. (2002). Understanding human knowledge in general. In: B. Stroud (Ed.), Understanding human knowledge: Philosophical essays (pp. 99-121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Williams, B. (1978). Descartes: The project of pure enquiry. Harmondsworth: Pelican.
29. Williamson, T. (2000). Knowledge and its limits. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30. Wright, C. (2003). Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference. In S. Nuccetelli (Ed.), New essays on semantic externalism and self-knowledge (pp. 57-77). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Wright, C. (2004). Warrant for nothing (and foundations for free?). Aristotelian Society Supplement, 78, 167-212.
32. Wright, C. (2007). The perils of dogmatism. In S. Nuccetelli & G. Seay (Eds.), Themes from G. E. Moore: New essays in epistemology and ethics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.