The importance of expanding current training in the responsible conduct of research

Academic Medicine

Volumn 73, Issue 12, 1998, Pages 1249-1254

  Mastroianni, Anna C ^a,b   Kahn, Jeffrey P ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CULTURAL FACTOR; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ETHICS; FINANCE; GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAFF;

EID: 0032435670     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199812000-00013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. National Academy of Sciences. Summary of a Planning Workshop for a Guide for Education in Responsible Science, February 26-27, 1997 [unpublished].
2. Reminder and update: requirement for instruction in the responsible conduct of research in National Research Service Award Institutional Training Grants. NIH Guide 21, November 27, 1992. NIH Guide http://www-nih.gov/grants/guide/〉. Accessed 9/15/98. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1998.
3. Department of Health and Human Services, Commission on Research Integrity. Integrity and Misconduct in Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1995.
4. Short-term courses in research ethics (PAR-98-005). NIH Guide 26, November 7, 1997. NIH Guide http://www.nih.gov/grants/guide/〉. Accessed 9/15/98. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1998.
5. Mentored scientist development award in research ethics (PAR-98-006). NIH Guide 26, November 7, 1997. NIH Guide http://www.nih.gov/grants/guide/〉. Accessed 9/15/98. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 1998.
6. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiements. The Human Radiation Experiments. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
7. Institute of Medicine, Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research. The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.
8. Korenman SG, Shipp AC, with the AAMC Ad Hoc Committee on Misconduct and Conflict of Interest in Research Subcommittee on Teaching Research Ethics. Teaching the Responsible Conduct of Research through a Case Study Approach: A Handbook for Instructors. Washington, DC: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1994.
9. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. 2 vols. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
10. Coughlin SS, Etheredge GD, Metayer A, Martin SA. Remember Tuskegee: public health student knowledge of the ethical significance of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Am J Prev Med. 1996;12:242-6.
11. Macrina FL, Munro C. The case study approach to teaching scientific integrity in nursing and the biomedical sciences. J Prof Nurs. 1995;11:40-4.
12. Lenz ER, Ketefian S. Promoting scientific integrity in nursing research. Part I: current approaches in doctoral programs. J Prof Nurs. 1995;11:213-9.
13. Range LM, Cotton CR. Reports of assent and permission in research with children: illustrations and suggestions. Ethics and Behavior. 1995;5:49-66.
14. Sachs GA, Siegler M. Teaching scientific integrity and the responsible conduct of research. Acad Med. 1993;68:871-5.
15. Pritchard IA. Integrity versus misconduct: learning the difference between right and wrong. Acad Med. 1993;68(9 Suppl):S67-S71.
16. Bulger RE, Reiser SJ. Studying science in the context of ethics. Acad Med. 1993;68(9 Suppl):S5-S9.
17. Friedman PJ. Responsible conduct of research: a teaching agenda for academic medicine. Acad Med. 1990;65:32-3.
18. Benditt J. Conduct in science. Science. 1995;268:1705-18.
19. Cohen JJ. The culture of credit. Science. 1995;268:1706-11.
20. Cohen JJ. Share and share alike isn't always the rule in science. Science. 1995;268:1715-8.
21. Bulger RE, Bobby EM, Fineberg HV (eds). Society's Choices: Social and Ethical Decision Making in Biomedicine. A Report of the Institute of Medicine Committee on the Social and Ethical Impacts of Developments in Biomedicine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
22. Mastroianni AC, Kahn JP. Encouraging Accountability in Research: A Pilot Assessment of Training Efforts. Accountability in Research [in press].
23. National Academy of Sciences. On Being a Scientist. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1995.
24. Macrina FL. Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases. Washington, DC: ASM Press, 1995.
25. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Integrity in Scientific Research: Five Video Vignettes. Washington, DC: AAAS, 1996.
26. Bulger RE, Heitman E, Reiser SJ (eds). The Ethical Dimensions of the Biological Sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1993.