Influence of abutment design on clinical status of peri-implant tissues

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 438-446

  Taiyeb Ali, Tara B ^a   Toh, Chooi Gait ^a   Siar, Chong Huat ^a   Seiz, Doris ^b   Ong, Siew Tin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

3 unit bridges; Butt joint abutment; Monkeys; Platform switching; Tapered joint abutment

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTURE; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MANDIBLE; PATHOLOGY; PERIIMPLANTITIS; PERIODONTAL POCKET; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PLAQUE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANIMALS; DENTAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT DESIGN; DENTAL PLAQUE INDEX; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; MACACA FASCICULARIS; MANDIBLE; PERI-IMPLANTITIS; PERIODONTAL POCKET;

EID: 77949295922     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181ad8e7a     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jansen VK, Conrad G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant. 1997;12:527-540.
2. Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1997; 8:290-298.
3. Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y, Matsumura H. Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal anti-rotation configuration. Dent Mater J. 2008; 27:29-34.
4. Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, et al. A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol. 2005;31: 269-275.
5. Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bössmann K, et al. In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:875-881.
6. Hermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, et al. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1372-1383.
7. Engelke W, Decco OA, Rau MJ, et al. In vitro evaluation of horizontal implant micromovement in bone specimen with contact endoscopy. Implant Dent. 2004; 13:88-94.
8. Norton MR. Understanding the intimate relationship between biomechanics and optimal clinical performance: Application of implant design. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002;23 (9 suppl 2):21-25.
9. Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. Introduction: A new and innovative implant design. J Oral Implantol. 2004;30:121-124.
10. Nentwig GH. Ankylos implant system: Concept and clinical application. J Oral Implantol. 2004;30:171-177.
11. Chou CT, Morris HF, Ochi S, et al. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: Loading to 36 months. J Oral Implantol. 2004;30:134-143.
12. Waite IM, Jalil R, Cornick DER. A probe for plaque measurement. Dental Practice. 1983;21:1-3.
13. Muhlemann HR, Son S. Gingival sulcus bleeding - A leading symptom in initial gingivitis. Helv Odontol Acta. 1971; 15:107-113.
14. Salvi GE, Lang NP. Diagnostic parameters for monitoring peri-implant conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:116-127.
15. Lang NP, Berglundh T, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, et al. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding implant survival and complications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004; (19 suppl):150-154.
16. Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The mucosal barrier following abutment dis/reconnection. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol. 1997;24:568-572.
17. Gross M, Abramovich I, Weiss EI. Microleakage at the abutment-implant interface of osseointegrated implants: A comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:94-100.
18. Bragger U, Hugel-Pisoni C, Bürgin W, et al. Correlations between radio-graphic, clinical and mobility parameters after loading of oral implants with fixed partial dentures. A 2-year longitudinal study. Oral Implants Res. 1996;7:230-239.
19. Toh CG, Siar CH, Seiz D, et al. Influence of abutment design on crestal bone in implant-tooth-supported bridges. J Dent Res 2005; Special Issue, Abstract 3287.
20. Morris HF, Winkler S, Ochi S. The ankylosed endosseous dental implant: Assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest. J Oral Implantol. 2000;26:291-299.