Professors, ideology and housework

Journal of Family and Economic Issues

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 399-411

  Nakhaie, M Reza ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Egalitarian Ideology; Housework; Professors

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949275856     PISSN: 10580476     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10834-009-9162-y     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Abercrombie, N., Hill, S., & Turner, B. (1980). The dominant ideology thesis. London: George Allen & Unwin.
2. Arrighi, B., & Maume, D., Jr. (2000). Workplace subordination and men's avoidance of housework. Journal of Family Issues, 21(4), 464-487.
3. Astin, H. S., & Milem, J. F. (1997). The status of academic couples in U. S. institutions. In M. A. Ferber & J. W. Loeb (Eds.), Academic couples: Problems and promises (pp. 128-155). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
4. Becker, G. S. (1974). A theory of marriage. In T. W. Schultz (Ed.), Economics of the family (pp. 299-344). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Berk, S. (1985). The gender factory: The apportionment of work in the American household. New York: Plenum Press.
6. Blair, S., & Johnson, M. (1992). Wive's perception of fairness and division of household labor. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 570-581.
7. Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of married living. New York: Free Press.
8. Bouwman, H. (2005). Great expectations: An academic's crash course in parenthood. In R. H. Bassett (Ed.), Parenting & professing: Balancing family work with an academic career (pp. 141-150). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
9. Breen, R., & Cooke, L. P. (2005). The persistence of the gendered division of domestic labor. European Sociological Review, 21(1), 43-57.
10. Brewer, C. P. (2005). Madonna with child: Untenured, but not undone. In R. H. Bassett (Ed.), Parenting & professing: Balancing family work with an academic career (pp. 61-70). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
11. Brines, J. (1994). Economic dependency, gender and the division of labor at home. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 652-688.
12. Calasanti, T., & Bailey, C. (1991). Gender inequality and the division of household labor in the United States and Sweden: A socialist-feminist approach. Social Problems, 38(1), 34-53.
13. Carlson, D. S., Deer, C. B., & Wadsworth, L. L. (2003). The effects of internal career orientation on multiple dimensions of work-family conflict. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24(1), 99-116.
14. Comer, D. R., & Stites-Doe, S. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of faculty women's academic-parental role balancing. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(3), 495-512.
15. Connell, R. W. (2002). Gender. Oxford: Polity Press.
16. Connell, R. W. (2005). Change among the gatekeepers: Men, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30(3), 1801-1825.
17. Cowan, R. S. (1983). More works for mothers: The ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. New York: Basic Books.
18. Craig, L. (2007). How employed mothers in Australia find time for both market work and childcare. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(1), 69-87.
19. Crouter, A. C., Perry-Jenkins, M., Huston, T. L., & McHale, S. M. (1987). Process underlying father involvement in dual-earner and single-earner families. Child Development, 23, 431-440.
20. Cunningham, M. (2005). Gender in cohabitation and marriage: The influence of gender ideology on household allocation over the life course. Journal of Family Issues, 26(8), 1037-1061.
21. Damiano-Teixeira, K. M. (2006). Managing conflicting roles: A qualitative study with female faculty members. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(2), 310-334.
22. Davis, D. E., & Astin, H. S. (1990). Life cycle, career patterns and gender stratification in academe: Breaking myths and exposing truths. In S. Stiver Lie & V. E. O'Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 89-107). London: Kogan Page.
23. Drago, R., Crouter, A. C., Wardell, M., & Willits, B. S. (2001). Final report to the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for the faculty and families project The Pennsylvania State University, March. Retrieved August 2, 2007, from http://lser. la. psu. edu/workfam/FFFinalReport. pdf.
24. Drago, R. W. (2007). Striking a balance: Work, family, life. Boston: Dollars and Sense.
25. Elliott, M. (2003). Work and family role strain among university employees. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24(2), 157-181.
26. Enders, J., & Teichler, U. (1997). A victim of their own success? Employment and working conditions of academic staff in comparative perspective. Higher Education, 34, 347-372.
27. Erickson, R. J. (2005). Why emotion work matters: Sex, gender, and division of household labour. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 337-351.
28. Estes, S. B., Noonan, M. C., & Maume, D. J. (2007). Is work family policy use related to the gendered division of housework? Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(4), 527-545.
29. Farkas, G. (1976). Education, wage rate and the division of labour between husband and wife. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 473-484.
30. Fast, J. E., & Frederick, J. A. (1996). Working arrangements and time stress. Canadian Social Trends, (Winter), 1, 4-19.
31. Gerson, K. (2004). Understanding work and family through a gender lens. Community, Work & Family, 7(2), 163-178.
32. Giddens, A. (1973). The class structure of advanced societies. London: Hutchinson University Press.
33. Golden, L. (2008). Limited access: Disparities in flexible works schedules and work-at-home. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 29(1), 86-109.
34. Greenstein, T. N. (1996a). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labor: Effects on marital quality. Social Forces, 74(3), 1029-1042.
35. Greenstein, T. N. (1996b). Husbands' participation in domestic labour: Interactive effects of wives' and husbands' gender ideology. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58, 585-595.
36. Haddad, T., & Lam, L. (1988). Canadian families-men's involvement in family work: A case study of immigrant men in Toronto. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 29(3-4), 269-281.
37. Haddock, S., Zimmerman, T., Ziemba, S., & Lyness, K. (2006). Practices of dual earner couples successfully balancing work and family. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 27(2), 207-234.
38. Hardesty, C., & Bokemeier, J. (1989). Finding times and making do: Distribution of household labour in non-metropolitan marriages. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 253-267.
39. Harpster, P., & Monk-Turner, E. (1998). Why men do housework: A test of gender production and relative resources model. Sociological Focus, 6(3), 366-394.
40. Harrington, M. A. (1991). Time after work: Constraints on leisure of working women. Society and Leisure, 14(1), 113-132.
41. Hochschild, A. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home. New York: Viking.
42. Huber, M. T. (1998). Community college faculty attitudes and trends, 1997 (Technical Report Number NCPI-4-03). Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
43. Jackman, M. R., & Muha, M. J. (1984). Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment or ideological refinement. American Sociological Review, 49(6), 751-769.
44. Jacob, P. E. (1957). Changing values in college. New York: Harper & Row.
45. Kamo, Y. (1988). Determinants of household division of labour: Resources, power and ideology. Journal of Family Issues, 9(2), 177-201.
46. Kamo, Y., & Cohen, E. (2000). "He said, she said": Assessing discrepancies in husbands' and wives' reports on the division of household labor. Social Science Research, 29, 459-476.
47. Klein, D., & Stern, C. (2005). Professors and their politics: The policy views of social scientists. Critical Review, 3-4, 257-303.
48. Kroska, A. (2004). Division of domestic work: Revising and expanding the theoretical explanations. Journal of Family Issues, 25(7), 900-932.
49. Kyvik, S. (1990). Age and scientific productivity: Differences between fields of learning. Higher Education, 19(1), 37-55.
50. Lennards, J. (1987). Academic profession in Canada. Toronto: Department of Sociology, York University.
51. Lottes, I., & Kuriloff, P. (1992). The effects of gender, race, religion, and political orientation on the sex role attitudes of college freshmen. Adolescence, 27(107), 675-688.
52. McFarlane, S., Beaujot, R., & Haddad, T. (2000). Time constraints and relative resources as determinants of sexual division of domestic work. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 25(1), 61-82.
53. McQuillan, K., & Belle, M. (1999). Who does what? Gender and division of labour in Canadian households. In J. Curtis, E. Grabb, & N. Guppy (Eds.), Social inequality in Canada (pp. 186-198). Scarborough: Prentice Hall Canada.
54. Messner, M. (1993). Changing men and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22, 273-737.
55. Miliband, R. (1973). The state in capitalist society: The analysis of the western system of power. London: Quartet Books.
56. Moen, P. (2005). Beyond the career mystique: "time in", "time out", and "second acts". Sociological Forum, 20(2), 189-208.
57. Nakhaie, M. R. (1995). Housework in Canada: The national picture. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 26(3), 409-426.
58. Nakhaie, M. R. (2002). Class, breadwinner ideology, and housework among Canadian husbands. Review of Radical Political Economics, 34, 137-157.
59. Nakhaie, M. R., & Brym, R. J. (1999). The political attitudes of Canadian professors. The Canadian Journal of Sociology, 24(3), 329-354.
60. Neuman, L. (2006). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. New York: Pearson.
61. Noordenbos, G. (1992). Explanations for differences in publication rates between male and female academics and between productive and less productive women. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologie, 35, 22-45.
62. Nordenmark, M. (2004). Does gender ideology explains differences between countries regarding the involvement of men and of women in paid and unpaid work? International Journal of Social Welfare, 13, 233-242.
63. Ollman, B. (1972). Toward class consciousness next time: Marx and the working class. Politics and Society, Fall, 1-24.
64. Olson, G. I., & Xiao, J. J. (1996). Effects of relative advantage on time use in farm families. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 17(3/4), 351-363.
65. Pittman, J., & Blanchard, D. (1996). Effects of work history and timing of marriage on the division of household labour: A life-course perspective. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 78-90.
66. Pittman, J., Teng, W., Kerpelman, J., & Solheim, C. (1999). Satisfaction with performance of housework: The roles of time spent, quality assessment and stress. Journal of Family Issues, 20(6), 746-770.
67. Pleck, J. H. (1997). Parental involvement: Levels, sources, and consequences. In J. C. Hood (Ed.), The role of the father in child development (pp. 6-103). New York: Wiley.
68. Presser, H. (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of labour by gender. American Sociological Review, 59, 348-364.
69. Rieman, J. (2005). Tenure-track to mommy-track: In search of scholarly self. In R. H. Bassett (Ed.), Parenting & professing: Balancing family work with an academic career (pp. 56-60). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
70. Roschelle, A. (1997). No more kin: Exploring race, class and gender in family networks. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Rothblum, E. D. (1988). Leaving the ivory tower: Factors contributing to women's voluntary resignation from the academia. Frontiers, 10(2), 14-27.
72. Sanchez, L. (1994). Gender, labor allocations, and the psychology of entitlement within the home. Social Forces, 73, 533-553.
73. Sanik, M. (1981). Division of household work: A decade of comparison-1967-1977. Home Economic Research Journal, 10, 175-180.
74. Shauman, K., & Xie, Y. (1996). Geographic mobility of scientists: Sex differences and family constraints. Demography, 33, 455-468.
75. Shelton, B. A. (1990). The distribution of household tasks: Does wife's employment status make a difference? Journal of Family Issues, 11, 115-135.
76. Shelton, B. A., & John, D. (1996). The division of household labor. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 299-322.
77. Solomon, C., Acock, A., & Walker, A. (2004). Gender ideology and investment in housework: Postretirement change. Journal of Family Issues, 25(8), 1050-1071.
78. Spitze, G. D. (1986). Division of home responsibilities. Social Forces, 64, 689-701.
79. Spitze, G. D. (1999). Getting help with housework: Household resources and social network. Journal of Family Issues, 20(6), 724-745.
80. Stiver Lie, S. (1990). The Juggling act: Work and family in Norway. In S. Stiver Lie & V. E. O'Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 108-128). London: Kogan Page.
81. Stratton, L. S. (2001). Why does more housework lower women's wages? Testing hypotheses involving job effort and hours flexibility. Social Science Quarterly, 82(1), 67-76.
82. Suitor, J. J., Mecom, D., & Feld, S. (2001). Gender, household labor, and scholarly productivity among university professors. Gender Issues, 19(4), 50-67.
83. Sutherland, M. (1985). Women who teach in universities. Staffordshire: European Institute of Education and Social Policy, Trentham Books.
84. Tausig, M., & Fenwick, R. (2001). Unbinding time: Alternative work schedules and work-life balance. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(2), 101-119.
85. Thompson, L. (1991). Family work: Women's sense of fairness. Journal of Family Issues, 12, 181-196.
86. Tong, Y., & Marks, N. (2004). Household labor, gender attitudes, and perceived marital unfairness among middle-aged and older couples. The Gerontologists, 44(1), 645-646.
87. Vasil, L. (1993). Gender differences in academic career in New Zealand universities. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 28(2), 143-153.
88. Voydanoff, P. (2005). The differential salience of family and community demands and resources for family-to-work conflict and facilitation. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 26(3), 395-417.
89. Weagley, R. O., Chan, M., & Yan, J. (2007). Married couples' time allocation decisions and marital stability. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(3), 507-525.
90. Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.
91. Wolf-Wendel, L. E., Twombly, S., & Rice, S. (2000). Dual-career couples: Keeping them together. Journal of Higher Education, 71(3), 291-321.
92. Zingraff, R., & Schulman, M. D. (1984). Social bases of class consciousness: A study of Southern textile workers with a comparison by race. Social Forces, 63(1), 98-116.