Does gender ideology explain differences between countries regarding the involvement of women and of men in paid and unpaid work?

International Journal of Social Welfare

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 233-243

  Nordenmark, Mikael ^a  

^a UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Employment; Gender ideology; Household work; Men; Women

Indexed keywords

EID: 3342938076     PISSN: 13696866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-6866.2004.00317.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Baxter J (1992). Power attitudes and time: The domestic division of labour. Journal of Comparative Family Studies 23: 165-182.
2. Blair SL, Johnson MP (1992). Wife's perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labour: the intersection of housework and ideology. Journal of Marriage and the Family 54: 570-581.
3. Blair SL, Lichter DT (1991). Measuring the division of household labour: gender segregation of housework among American couples. Journal of Family Issues 12: 91-113.
4. Boling P (1998). Family policy in Japan. Journal of Social Policy 27: 173-190.
5. Braun M, Scott J, Alwing DF (1994). Economic necessity or self-actualization? Attitudes toward womens labour-force participation in East and West Germany. European Sociological Review 10: 29-47.
6. Coltrane S (2000). Research on the household labour: modeling and measuring the social embeddedness of routine family work. Journal of Marriage and the Family 62: 1208-1233.
7. Coverman S, Sheley JF (1986). Change in men's housework and child-care time, 1965-1975. Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 413-422.
8. Esping-Andersen G (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, Polity Press.
9. Esping-Andersen G (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
10. Greenstein TN (1996). Gender ideology and perceptions of the fairness of the division of household labour: effects on marital quality. Social Forces 74: 1029-1042.
11. Greenstein TN (2000). Economic dependence, gender and the division of labour in the home: a replication and extension. Journal of Marriage & Family 62: 322-336.
12. Hjerm M (1998). National identity: a comparison of Sweden, Germany and Australia. Journal of Ethics and Migration Studies 24: 451-469.
13. Hochschild A (1989). The second shift. New York, NY, Avon Books.
14. Hochschild A (1997). The time bind. When work becomes home and home becomes work. New York, NY, Metropolitan Books.
15. ISSP (1994). Codebook for the module: Family and changing gender roles. http://www.isp-org.
16. Kalleberg AL, Rosenfeld RA (1990). Work in the family and in the labour market: a cross-national, reciprocal analysis. Journal of Marriage and the Family 52: 331-346.
17. Kwon H (1997). Beyond European welfare regimes: Comparative perspectives on East Asian welfare systems. Journal of Social Policy 4: 467-484.
18. Leibfried S (1992). Towards a European welfare state? On integrating poverty regimes into the European Community. In: Ferge Z, Kolberg JE, eds. Social policy in a changing Europe. Boulder, CO, Westview Press.
19. Lewis J (1992). Gender and the development of welfare regimes. Journal of European Social Policy 2: 159-173.
20. Morris L (1990). The workings of the household. Cambridge: Polity Press.
21. Nordenmark M (2000). Unemployment and family life: the relationship among employment status, household division of labour and well-being. In: Harvey C, ed. Walking a tightrope: meeting the challenges of work and family. London, Ashgate.
22. OECD (2000). Employment outlook. Paris, OECD Publications.
23. Panayotova E, Brayfield A (1997). National context and gender ideology. Attitudes towards women's employment in Hungary and the United States. Gender & Society 11: 627-655.
24. Pahl RE (1984). Division of labour. Oxford, Basil Blackwell.
25. Perrucci C, Potter HR, Rhoads DL (1978). Determinants of male family-role performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly 3: 53-65.
26. Presland P, Antkill JK (1987). Household division of labour: the impact of hours worked in paid employment. Australian Journal of Psychology 39: 273-291.
27. Presser HB (1994). Employment schedules among dual-earner spouses and the division of household labour by gender. American Sociological Review 59: 348-364.
28. Ross CE (1987). The division of labour at home. Social Forces 65: 816-833.
29. Ross CE, Mirowsky J, Huber J (1983). Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: marriage patterns and depression. American Sociological Review 48: 809-823.
30. Sainsbury D (1999). Gender and welfare state regimes. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
31. Scott J, Alwin DF, Braun M (1996). Generational changes in gender-role attitudes: Britain in a cross-national perspective. Sociology 30: 471-492.
32. Shamir B (1986). Unemployment and household division of labour. Journal of Marriage and the Family 48: 195-206.
33. Shelton BA, John D (1996). The division of household labour. Annual Review of Sociology 22: 1437-1451.
34. Stastics Sweden (2000). På tal om kvinnor och män. Lathund om jämställdhet [Women and men in Sweden]. Örebro Statistics Sweden.
35. Sundström E (1999). Should mothers work? Age and attitudes in Germany, Italy and Sweden. International Journal of Social Welfare 8: 193-205.
36. Svallfors S (1996). National differences in national identities? An introduction to the International Social Survey Program. New Community 22: 127-134.
37. Szinovacz M (1994). Couples' Employment/retirement status and the division of household tasks. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 49: 125-136.
38. United Nations (1995). Women and men in Europe and North America 1995. Geneva, United Nations publications.
39. Walby S (1994). Methodological and theoretical issues in the comparative analysis of gender relations in Western Europe. Environment and Planning 26: 1339-1354.