Residential response to critical-peak pricing of electricity: California evidence

Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1561-1567

  Herter, Karen ^a   Wayland, Seth ^a  

^a Heschong Mahone Group   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical peak pricing; Demand response; Dynamic pricing; Residential electricity

Indexed keywords

COSTS;

BUILDING TYPES; CALIFORNIA; CRITICAL PEAK PRICING; DEMAND RESPONSE; DYNAMIC PRICING; PEAK PRICES; PEAK RESPONSE; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY;

DYNAMIC RESPONSE;

CLIMATE CONDITIONS; COMMUNITY RESPONSE; ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; PRICE DYNAMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIDENTIAL ENERGY; SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT;

EID: 77949270807     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2009.07.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Jurewitz J.L. California's electricity debacle: a guided tour. The Electricity Journal 15 4 (2002) 10-29
2. Borenstein S. The trouble with electricity markets: understanding California's restructuring disaster. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 1 (2002) 191-211
3. Woo C.K. What went wrong in California's electricity market?. Energy 26 8 (2003) 747-758
4. Joskow P. Markets for power in the United States: an interim assessment. The Energy Journal 27 1 (2006) 1-36
5. California Energy Commission. 2004 integrated energy policy report update. Sacramento, CA: 1516 9th St., Sacramento, CA 95814, 2004; http://www.energy.ca.gov/reports/CEC-100-2004-006/CEC-100-2004-006CMF.PDF.
6. United states energy policy act of 2005. 2005.
7. Kueck J.D., Kirby B.J., Eto J., Staunton R.H., Marnay C., Martinez C.A., et al. Load as a reliability resource in restructured electricity markets, report no. LBNL-47983 (2001), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA. http://www.ornl.gov/∼webworks/cppr/y2001/rpt/110838.pdf
8. Crew M.A., Fernando C.S., and Kleindorfer P.R. The theory of peak load pricing: a survey. Journal of regulatory economics 8 (1995) 215-248
9. Hirst E. Price-responsive demand as reliability resources (2002), Oak Ridge, Tennessee: 106 Capital Circle Oak Ridge, TN 37830
10. Kirby BJ. Spinning reserve from responsive loads, report no. ORNL/TM-2003/19. OakRidge National Laboratory; 2003; 106 Capital Circle, Oak Ridge, TN 37830. http://certs.lbl.gov/pdf/air-conditioning-load.pdf.
11. Hirst E. The financial and physical insurance benefits of price-responsive demand. The Electricity Journal 15 4 (2002) 66-73
12. Braithwait S., and Faruqui A. The choice not to buy: energy savings and policy alternatives for demand response. Public Utilities Fortnightly (2001) 48-60
13. Hirst E., and Hadley S. Maintaining generation adequacy in a restructuring US electricity industry, report no. ORNL/CON-472 (1999), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN. http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/15044-quHiNl/webviewable/ 106 Capital Circle, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
14. California Energy Commission. California energy demand 2008-2018 staff revised forecast, report no. CEC-200-2007-015-SF2. Sacramento, CA: 2007; http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-200-2007-015/CEC-200-2007-015-SF2.PDF.
15. Faruqui A., and George S. Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. The Electricity Journal 18 4 (2005) 53-63
16. Herter K., McAuliffe P., and Rosenfeld A. An exploratory analysis of California residential customer response to critical peak pricing of electricity. Energy 32 1 (2007) 25-34
17. Herter K. Residential implementation of critical peak pricing of electricity. Energy Policy 35 4 (2007) 2121-2130
18. Momentum Market Intelligence. Statewide pricing pilot: end-of-pilot participant assessment; 2004. 220 NW 2nd Avenue, Suite 600, Portland, OR 97209.
19. King C., and Chatterjee S. Predicting California demand response. Public Utilities Fortnightly (2003) 27-32
20. Herter K., Wayland S., and Rasin J. Small business demand response with communicating thermostats: Smud's summer solutions research pilot (2009), California Energy Commission, PIER Building End-Use Energy Efficiency Program, Sacramento, CA
21. Pacific Gas and Electric Company. Table i-1: Pacific gas and electric company interruptible, curtailment and demand response programs subscription statistics, december 2008 (2009), Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the California Public Utilities Commission, San Francisco, CA
22. Atkinson S. Responsiveness to time-of-day electricity pricing: first empirical results. Journal of Econometrics 9 (1979) 79-95
23. Aigner D.J., and Hausman J.A. Correcting for truncation bias in the analysis of experiments in time-of-day pricing of electricity. Bell Journal of Economics 11 1 (1980) 131-142
24. Caves D.W., and Christensen L.R. Econometric analysis of residential time-of-use electricity pricing experiments. Journal of Econometrics 14 3 (1980) 287-306
25. Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., and Herriges J.A. Consistency of residential customer response in time-of-use electricity pricing experiments. Journal of Econometrics 26 1-2 (1984) 179-203
26. Herriges J.A., Caves D.W., and Christensen L.R. Modeling alternative residential peak-load electricity rate structures. Journal of Econometrics 26 (1984) 249-268
27. Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., and Herriges J.A. The neoclassical model of consumer demand with identically priced commodities: an application to time-of-use electricity pricing. Rand Journal of Economics 18 4 (1987) 564-580
28. Woo C.K., and Herter K. Residential demand response evaluation: a scoping study (2006), Demand Response Research Center, Berkeley, CA
29. Kmenta J. Elements of econometrics (1986), MacMillan, New York, NY
30. Cochran W. Sampling techniques (1977), John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
31. Woo C.K. Demand for electricity of small nonresidential customers under time-of-use pricing. Energy Journal 6 4 (1985) 115-127