An exploratory analysis of California residential customer response to critical peak pricing of electricity

Energy

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 25-34

  Herter, Karen ^a,b   McAuliffe, Patrick ^c   Rosenfeld, Arthur ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical peak pricing; Demand response; Electricity pricing; Load response; Residential electricity

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ELECTRIC LOADS; STATISTICAL METHODS; THERMOSTATS;

CRITICAL PEAK PRICING; DEMAND RESPONSE; ELECTRICITY PRICING; LOAD RESPONSE; RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY;

ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION;

COSTS; ELECTRIC LOADS; ELECTRIC POWER DISTRIBUTION; STATISTICAL METHODS; THERMOSTATS;

ANALYTICAL METHOD; DATA SET; ELECTRICITY; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; RESOURCE AVAILABILITY;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33749253365     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Jurewitz J.L. California's electricity debacle: a guided tour. Electr J 15 4 (2002) 10-29
2. Borenstein S. The trouble with electricity markets: understanding California's restructuring disaster. J Econ Perspect 16 1 (2002) 191-211
3. Woo C.K. What went wrong in California's electricity market?. Energy 26 8 (2003) 747-758
4. Woo C.K., Lloyd D., and Tishler A. Electricity market reform failures: UK, Norway, Alberta and California. Energy Policy 31 11 (2003) 1103-1115
5. California Energy Commission. Integrated energy policy report update. Sacramento, CA, 2004.
6. United States Energy Policy Act of 2005, Section 1252(f), 2005.
7. Kueck J.D., Kirby B.J., Eto J., Staunton R.H., Marnay C., Martinez C.A., et al. Load as a reliability resource in restructured electricity markets, LBNL-47983 (2001), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
8. Hirst E. Price-responsive demand as reliability resources (2002), Tennessee, Oak Ridge, TN
9. Kirby BJ. Spinning reserve from responsive loads. ORNL/TM-2003/19Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 2003.
10. Hirst E. The financial and physical insurance benefits of price-responsive demand. Electr J 15 4 (2002) 66-73
11. Braithwait S., and Faruqui A. The choice not to buy: energy savings and policy alternatives for demand response. Public Utilities Fortnightly (2001) 48-60
12. Hirst E., and Hadley S. Maintaining generation adequacy in a restructuring US electricity industry, ORNL/CON-472 (1999), Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
13. Caves D.W., and Christensen L.R. Econometric analysis of residential time-of-use electricity pricing experiments. J Econ 14 3 (1980) 287-306
14. Caves D.W., Christensen L.R., and Herriges J.A. Consistency of residential customer response in time-of-use electricity pricing experiments. J Econ 26 1-2 (1984) 179-203
15. Train K., and Mehrez G. The impacts of optional time-of-use prices: a case study. Energy Build 22 3 (1995) 267-278
16. Faruqui A., and George S. Quantifying customer response to dynamic pricing. Electr J 18 4 (2005) 53-63
17. Braithwait S. Residential TOU price response in the presence of interactive communication equipment. In: Furuqui A., and Eakin K. (Eds). Pricing in competitive electricity markets (2001), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA 359-373
18. Freeman Sullivan and Company. 1992 Transtext experiment evaluation (1993), Freeman, Sullivan and Company, San Francisco, CA
19. Gulf Power Company Marketing and Load Management. Results of the pilot residential advanced energy management (AEM) system (1994), Gulf Power Company, Pensacola, FL
20. Charles River Associates. Statewide Pricing Pilot summer 2003 impact analysis (draft) (2004), Charles River Associates, Oakland, CA
21. Herter K., McAuliffe P., and Rosenfeld A. Observed temperature effects on hourly residential electric load reduction in response to an experimental critical peak pricing tariff, LBNL-58956 (2005), Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA
22. Heckman J. Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47 (1979) 153-161
23. Train K. Qualitative choice analysis (1986), Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA
24. Ham J., Mountain D., and Chan M. Time-of-use prices and electricity demand: allowing for selection bias in experimental data. Rand J Econ 28 1 (1997) 113-141
25. Charles River Associates. Impact evaluation of the California statewide pricing pilot (2005), Charles River Associates, Oakland, CA