Dolphin deaths, organizational legitimacy and potential employees' reactions to assured environmental disclosures

Accounting Forum

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-19

  Kuruppu, Sanjaya ^a   Milne, Markus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Assurance; Corporate environmental information; Newspaper reports; Organizational legitimacy; Stakeholder perceptions and decision making

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949270768     PISSN: 01559982     EISSN: 14676303     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.accfor.2009.12.001     Document Type: Article

References (122)

1. ACCA. Corporate social responsibility: Is there a business case? (2003), ACCA, London
2. ACCA/CorporateRegister.com. Towards transparency: Progress on global sustainability reporting (2004), Certified Accountants Educational Trust, London
3. AccountAbility. AA1000 assurance standard (2003), AccountAbility, London
4. AccountAbility. AA1000 assurance standard practitioners note (2003), AccountAbility, London
5. Adler R.W., and Milne M.J. Media exposure, company size, industry, and social disclosure practices. Paper presented at the Fifth International Perspectives on Accounting (IPA) Conference. Manchester, London (1997)
6. Anderton, J. (2007). 0Draft threat management plan for Hector's dolphin, press release from the minister of fisheries [http://beehive.govt.nz/release/draft+threat+management+plan+hector%E2%8 0%99s+dolphin accessed 24 January, 2009].
7. Anderton, J. (2008). Minister of fisheries decision [http://www.fish.govt.nz/NR/rdonlyres/E4A595B5-9FF7-4543-B341-B6DCCFE05D 56/0/Ministers_decision_letter.pdf accessed 25 January, 2009].
8. Azzone G., Brophy M., Noci G., Welford R., and Young W. A stakeholders' view of environmental reporting. Long Range Planning 30 5 (1997) 699-709
9. Ball A., Owen D.L., and Gray R. External transparency or internal capture? The role of third party statements in adding value to corporate environmental reports. Business Strategy and the Environment 9 1 (2000) 1-23
10. Beets S.D., and Souther C.C. Corporate environmental reports: The need for standards and an environmental assurance service. Accounting Horizons 13 2 (1999) 129-145
11. Belkaoui A. The impact of socio-economic accounting statements on the investment decision: An empirical study. Accounting, Organizations and Society 5 3 (1980) 263-283
12. Benjamin J.J., and Stanga K.G. Difference in disclosure needs of major users of financial statements. Accounting and Business Research, Summer (1977) 187-192
13. Blacconiere W.G., and Patten D.M. Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics 18 (1993) 357-377
14. Brennan N.M., Guillamon-Saorin E., and Pierce A. Impression management: Developing and illustrating a scheme for narrative disclosures - A methodological note. Accounting, Audting and Accountability Journal 28 5 (2009) 789-832
15. Brown N., and Deegan C. The public disclosure of environmental performance information-a dual test of media agenda setting theory and legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research 29 1 (1998) 21-42
16. Bruno K., and Karliner J. earthsummit.biz: The corporate takeover of sustainable development (2002), Food First Books, California
17. Buzby S.L., and Falk H. A survey of the interest in social responsibility information by mutual funds. Accounting, Organizations and Society 3 3-4 (1978) 191-201
18. Campbell D.J., and Slack R.E. Analysts' perspectives on the materiality of voluntary narratives in annual reports (2008), ACCA Research Report, London
19. Care for the Wild (2007). Separating facts from fiction: A response to seafic [http://www.careforthewild.com/files/facts_or_fiction_response_to_seafic .pdf accessed 24 January, 2009].
20. Chan C.C.C., and Milne M.J. Investor reactions to corporate environmental saints and sinners: An experimental analysis. Accounting and Business Research 29 4 (1999) 265-279
21. Chapman R., and Milne M.J. The triple bottom line: How New Zealand companies measure up. corporate environmental strategy. International Journal for Sustainable Business 11 2 (2004) 37-50
22. Cho C.H., and Patten D.M. The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organisations and Society 32 (2007) 639-647
23. Co-operative Bank (2007). Ethical Consumerism Report [retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.goodwithmoney.co.uk/images/pdf/ethical_consumer_report_2007.p df].
24. CorporateRegister.com. Assure view: The CSR assurance statement report (2008), Park Communications Limited, London pp. 639-647
25. Danastas L., and Gadenne D. Social and environmental NGO's as users of Corporate Social Disclosure. Journal of Environmental Policy and Management 8 1 (2006) 85-102
26. Deegan C. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures-A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 3 (2002) 282-311
27. Deegan C., Cooper B.J., and Shelly M. An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: UK and European evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal 21 4 (2006) 329-371
28. Deegan C., Cooper B.J., and Shelly M. An investigation of TBL report assurance statements: Australian evidence. Australian Accounting Review 16 2 (2006) 2-18
29. Deegan C., and Gordon B. A study of the environmental disclosure policies of australian corporations. Accounting and Business Research 26 3 (1996) 187-199
30. Deegan C., and Rankin M. Do Australian companies report environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by environmental protection authority. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 9 2 (1996) 50-67
31. Deegan C., and Rankin M. The materiality of environmental information to users of annual reports. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 10 4 (1997) 562-583
32. Deegan C., Rankin M., and Tobin J. An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983 to 1997, a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 15 3 (2002) 312-343
33. Deegan C., Rankin M., and Voght P. Firms' Disclosure Reactions to Major Social Incidents: Australian Evidence. Accounting Forum 24 1 (2000) 101-130
34. Dietz T., Stern P.C., and Guagnano G.A. Social structural and social psychological bases of environmental concern. Environment and Behavior 30 4 (1998) 450-471
35. Elkington J. Cannibals with forks. Gabriola Island (1997), New Society Publishers, Canada
36. Epstein M.J., and Freedman M. Social disclosure and the individual investor. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7 4 (1994) 94-109
37. Fedération des Experts Comptables Européens (FEE) 2002. Providing assurance on sustainability reports. Discussion paper. Brussels: Fedération des Experts Comptables Européens.
38. Firth M. A study of the consensus of the perceived importance of disclosure of individual items in corporate annual reports. The International Journal of Accounting Education and Research 14 1 (1978) 57-70
39. Freedman M., and Patten D.M. Evidence on the pernicious effect of financial report environmental disclosure. Accounting Forum 28 (2004) 27-41
40. Futerra Sustainability Communications (n.d.). The Greenwash guide [retrieved on January 22, 2009, from http://www.futerra.co.uk/downloads/Greenwash_Guide.pdf].
41. Gray R. Current developments and trends in social and environmental auditing, reporting and attestation: A review and comment. International Journal of Auditing 4 (2000) 247-268
42. Gray R., Kouhy R., and Lavers S. Corporate social and environmental reporting: A review of the literature and a longitudinal study of UK disclosure. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 8 2 (1995) 47-77
43. Gray R., Owen D.L., and Adams C. Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting (1996), Prentice-Hall, London
44. Gray R., Owen D., and Maunders K. Corporate social reporting: Accounting and accountability (1987), Prentice-Hall, London
45. Gray R., Owen D., and Maunders K. Corporate social reporting: Emerging trends in accountability and the social contract. Accounting, Auditing, and Accountability Journal 1 1 (1988) 6-20
46. Greenpeace (2004). Dolphins die in trawler nets, Greenpeace International [http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/dolphins-die-in-trawler-ne ts accessed 23 January, 2009].
47. Greenpeace International (n.d.). The Greenpeace book of Greenwash. Washington: Greenpeace International.
48. Greer, J., & Bruno, K. (1996). Greenwash: The reality behind corporate environmentalism. Penang: Third World Network.
49. Global Reporting Initiative (1999). Sustainability reporting guidelines: Exposure draft for public comment and testing. Boston: Global Reporting Initiative.
50. Global Reporting Initiative (2000). Sustainability reporting guidelines on economic, environmental and social performance. Boston: Global Reporting Initiative.
51. Global Reporting Initiative. (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines-Draft. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
52. Global Reporting Initiative. (2006). Sustainability reporting guidelines [retrieved on January 30, 2009, from http://www.globalreporting.org/NR/rdonlyres/ED9E9B36-AB54-4DE1-BFF2-5F73 5235CA44/0/G3_GuidelinesENU.pdf].
53. Guthrie J., and Parker L.D. Corporate social disclosure practice: A comparative international analysis. Advances in Public Interest Accounting 3 (1990) 343-352
54. Hendricks J.A. The impact of human resource accounting information on stock investment decisions: An empirical study. Accounting Review 51 (1976) 292-305
55. Hodgson (2003). Maui's dolphin protected by areas closed to set nets, press release from the minister of fisheries [http://www.fish.govt.nz/en-nz/Press/Press+Releases+2003/January+2003/Ma uis+Dolphin+Protected+by+Areas+Closed+to+Set+Nets.htm accessed 26 January, 2009].
56. Holm C., and Rikhardsson P. Experienced and novice investors: Does environmental information influence investment allocation decisions. European Accounting Review 17 3 (2008) 537-557
57. Islam, M. A., & Deegan, C. (2008). Media pressures and corporate disclosure of social responsibility performance: A case study of two Global clothing and sports retail companies [unpublished paper] [retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.afaanz.org/openconf-afaanz2008/modules/request.php?module=oc_ proceedings&action=view.php&a=Accept+as+Paper&id=447].
58. Kolk, A, & Perego, P. (in press). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. In Business Strategy and the Environment, http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/110431545/issue.
59. KPMG. KPMG international survey of environmental reporting 1993 (1993), KPMG Environmental Consulting, London
60. KPMG (2001). The business case for sustainability [retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.kpmg.ca/en/industries/enr/energy/documents/SustainabilityBusi nessCase.pdf].
61. KPMG (2005). International survey of corporate sustainability reporting [retrieved November 3, 2008, from http://www.kpmg.ca/en/industries/enr/energy/documents/KPMGCRSurvey.pdf].
62. KPMG/Sustainability (2008). Count me. In The readers' take on sustainability reporting [retrieved February 4, 2009, from http://www.kpmg.com.au/Portals/0/sas_count-me-in-survey-report2008.pdf].
63. Lindsay R.M. Reconsidering the status of tests of significance: An alternative criterion of adequacy. Accounting, Organizations, and Society 20 (1995) 35-53
64. Lindsay, R. M., & Ehrenberg, A. S. C. (1993). The design of replicated studies, American Statistician, August, pp. 217--228.
65. Little, A. D. (2001). The business case for corporate citizenship [retrieved on February 5, 2009, from http://www.csrwire.com/pdf/Business-Case-for-Corporate-Citzenship.pdf].
66. Liyanarachchi G., and Milne M.J. Comparing the investment decisions of accounting practitioners and students: An empirical study on the adequacy of student surrogates. Accounting Forum 29 2 (2005) 121-135
67. Locke E.A. Generalizing from laboratory to field settings (1986), Lexington Books
68. Lorraine N.H.J., Collison D.J., Power, and Power D.M. An analysis of the stock market impact of environmental performance information. Accounting Forum 28 (2004) 7-26
69. Mathews M.R. A suggested classification for social accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 3 (1984) 199-221
70. Milne M.J., and Chan C.C. Narrative corporate social disclosures: How much of a difference do they make to investment decision-making?. British Accounting Review 31 (1999) 439-457
71. Milne M., and Gray R. Future prospects for sustainability reporting. In: Unerman J., O'Dwyer B., and Bebbington J. (Eds). Sustainability accounting and accountability (2007), Routledge, London 184-207
72. Milne M.J., and Patten D.M. Securing organizational legitimacy: An experimental decision case examining the impact of environmental disclosures. Accounting Auditing and Accountability Journal 15 3 (2002) 372-405
73. Milne M.J., Tregidga H., and Walton S. The triple bottom line: Benchmarking New Zealand's early reporters. University of Auckland Business Review 5 2 (2003) 36-50
74. Milne M.J., Tregidga H.M., and Walton S. Words not Actions! The ideological role of sustainable development reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 22 8 (2009) 1211-1257
75. Ministry for Fisheries and DOC (2007). Draft Hector's and Maui's dolphin threat management plan [http://www.fish.govt.nz/en-nz/Consultations/Under+Review/hector/default .htm, accessed 25 January, 2009].
76. Mitchell R., Agle B., and Wood D. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22 4 (1997) 853-886
77. Mock T.J., Strohm C., and Swartz K.M. An examination of worldwide assured sustainability reporting. Australian Accounting Review 17 1 (2007) 67-77
78. New Zealand Business Council for Sustainable Development (2002). Sustainable Development Reporting [retrieved June 18, 2008, from http://www.nzbcsd.org.nz/sdr/].
79. O'Connell D.A. Tuna, dolphins, and purse seine fishing in the eastern tropical Pacific: The controversy continues. Journal of Environmental Law 23 (2005) 77-100
80. O'Donovan G. Managing legitimacy through increased corporate reporting: An exploratory study. Interdisciplinary Environmental Review 1 1 (1999) 63-99
81. O'Dwyer B., and Owen D. Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: A critical evaluation. The British Accounting Review 37 (2005) 205-229
82. O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., and Hession E. User needs in sustainability reporting: Perspectives of stakeholders in Ireland. European Accounting Review 14 4 (2005) 759-787
83. O'Dwyer B., Unerman J., and Hession E. Perceptions on the emergence and future development of corporate social disclosure in Ireland: Engaging the voices of non-governmental organisations. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 18 1 (2005) 14-30
84. Owen D.L., Swift T.A., Humphrey C., and Bowerman M. The new social audits: Accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?. The European Accounting Review 9 1 (2000) 81-98
85. Owen D.L., Swift T., and Hunt K. Questioning the role of stakeholder engagement in social and ethical accounting, auditing and reporting. Accounting Forum 25 3 (2001) 264-282
86. Park T., and Brorson T. Experiences of and views on third-party assurance of corporate environmental and sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production 13 10-11 (2005) 1095-1106
87. Patten D.M. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: A note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organisations and Society 17 5 (1992) 471-475
88. Patten D.M. Media exposure, public policy pressure, and environmental disclosure: An examination of the impact of tri data availability. Accounting Forum 26 2 (2002) 152-171
89. Philippe D. Talking green: Organizational environmental communication as a legitimacy-Enhancement strategy. Academy of Management, Organisations and the Natural Environment (ONE) Meetings. Atlanta, US (2006)
90. Rikhardsson P., and Holm C. The effect of environmental information on investment allocation decisions-An experimental study. Business Strategy and the Environment 17 (2008) 297-382
91. Rockness J., and Williams P.F. A descriptive study of social responsibility mutual funds. Accounting, Organisations and Society 13 4 (1988) 397-411
92. Sagoff M. On the value of endangered and other species. Environmental Management 20 6 (1996) 897-911
93. Sanford (2007). Sustainable Development Report [retrieved on February 11, 2009, from http://live.isitesoftware.co.nz/sanford/documents/SANFORD_07-SDR.pdf].
94. SIC (Seafood Industry Council) (2007). No justification for dolphin measures, press release [http://www.seafood.co.nz/n998,45.html accessed 23 January, 2009].
95. SIC (Seafood Industry Council) (2007). Hector's and Maui's dolphin [http://www.seafood.co.nz/n989,174.html accessed 23 January, 2009].
96. SIC (Seafood Industry Council) (2007). Seafood industry welcomes careful consideration on dolphin decision, press release [http://www.seafood.co.nz/n1023,45.html accessed 23 January, 2009].
97. SIC (Seafood Industry Council) (2007). Submission on Hector's and Maui's dolphin threat management plan [http://www.seafood.co.nz/f999,42996/42996_Submission_Maui_s_Hector_s_do lphins.pdf accessed 24 January, 2009].
98. SIC (Seafood Industry Council) (2008). 83% of New Zealanders agree with current protections for Maui's dolphins, press release [http://www.seafood.co.nz/n1258,198.html accessed 23 January, 2009].
99. SIC (Seafood Industry Council) (2008). Minister's decision will not save dolphins, but will ruin lives, press release [http://www.seafood.co.nz/n1304,198.html accessed 23 January, 2009].
100. Simnett, R., Nugent, M., & Huggins, A. (2008). Developing an international assurance service on carbon emissions disclosures. Working paper. Australia: University of New South Wales.
101. Slooten, L. (2008). Hector's dolphin death rate is unsustainable [http://www.otago.ac.nz/news/news/2008/17b-10-08_press_release.html accessed 26 January, 2009].
102. Slooten E., and Dawson S. The North Island Hector's Dolphin is vulnerable to extinction. Marine Mammal Science 17 2 (2001) 366-371
103. Slooten, L. & Dawson, S. (2007). The facts on Hector's and Maui's Dolphins, NZ Herald, November 5 [http://www.nzherald.co.nz/animal-science/news/article.cfm?c_id=332& objectid=10473955 accessed January 25, 2009].
104. Spash C.L. Ethics and environmental attitudes with implications for economic valuation. Journal of Environmental Management 50 (1997) 403-416
105. Spash C.L. Informing and forming preferences in environmental valuation: Coral reef biodiversity. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (2002) 665-687
106. Stern P.C. New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56 3 (2000) 407-424
107. Stern P.C., Kalof L., Dietz T., and Guagnano G.A. Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 25 18 (1995) 1611-1636
108. Tilling M. Some thoughts on legitimacy theory in social and environmental accounting. Social and Environmental Accounting Journal 24 2 (2004) 3-7
109. Tilt C.A. The influence of external pressure groups on corporate social disclosure: Some empirical evidence. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 7 4 (1994) 47-72
110. Tregidga, H., Milne, M., & Kearins, K. (2007). The role of discourse in bridging the text and context of corporate social and environmental reporting [retrieved November 03, 2008 from http://www.afis.canterbury.ac.nz/publications/DiscussionPapers/TregidgaM ilneKearinsTheRole%20of%20Discourse.pdf].
111. UNEP/SustainAbility (1994). Company environmental reporting: A measure of the progress business & industry towards sustainable development. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
112. UNEP/SustainAbility (1996). Engaging stakeholders: The benchmark survey. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
113. UNEP/SustainAbility (1997). The 1997 benchmark survey: The third international progress report on company environmental reporting. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
114. UNEP/SustainAbility (1999). The social reporting report. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
115. UNEP/SustainAbility (2000). The global reporters: The 2000 benchmark survey. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
116. UNEP/SustainAbility (2002). Trust us: The global reporters 2002 survey of corporate sustainability. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
117. UNEP/SustainAbility (2004). Risk & opportunity: Best practice in non-financial reporting. London: UNEP/SustainAbility.
118. UNEP/Sustainability (2006). Tomorrow's value: The global reporters 2006 survey of corporate sustainability reporting. London: Sustainability Ltd.
119. Wallage P. Assurance on sustainability reporting: An auditor's view. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 19 (2000) 53-65
120. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2000). Corporate social responsibility: Making good business sense [retrieved on January 22, 2009, from http://www.wbcsd.org/DocRoot/IunSPdIKvmYH5HjbN4XC/csr2000.pdf].
121. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2002). Sustainability reporting guidelines [retrieved on January 22, 2009, from http://www.wbcsd.org/web/projects/cement/tf6/GRI_guidelines_print.pdf].
122. Wiseman J. An evaluation of environmental disclosures made in corporate annual reports. Accounting Organizations and Society 7 1 (1982) 53-63