Computational tool for post-earthquake evaluation of damage in buildings

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 63-86

  Carreño, Martha L ^a   Cardona, Omar D ^b   Barbat, Alex H ^c  

^a INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING CIMNE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; BUILDINGS; COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EARTHQUAKES; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; FUZZY INFERENCE; FUZZY RULES; INTELLIGENT COMPUTING; MULTILAYER NEURAL NETWORKS; SAFETY ENGINEERING;

COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNIQUES; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; ENGINEERING DECISION MAKING; FEED-FORWARD ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS; HYBRID NEURO-FUZZY SYSTEM; INCOMPLETE INFORMATION; STRONG EARTHQUAKES; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

FUZZY NEURAL NETWORKS;

BUILDING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DAMAGE MECHANICS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; NUMERICAL MODEL; SAFETY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRONG MOTION; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 77749327444     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/1.3282885     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Applied Technology Council (ATC), 1985. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, ATC-13, Redwood City, California.
2. -, 1989. Procedures for Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, ATC-20, Redwood City, California.
3. -, 2003. Users manual: Mobile Postearthquake Building Safety Evaluation Data Acquisition System, (Version 1.0), ATC-20i, Redwood City, California.
4. -, 2005. Field Manual: Postearthquake Safety Evaluation of Buildings, 2nd edition, ATC20-1, Redwood City, California.
5. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica (AIS), 2002. Guía técnica para inspección de edificaciones después de un sismo. Manual de Campo, [Technical guidelines for inspection of buildings after an earthquake: Field Manual], Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
6. -, 2003a. Manual de Campo para inspección de edificíos después de un sismo [Field Manual for inspection of buildings after an earthquake], Bogotá, D.C., Colombia.
7. -, 2003b. Sistema experto para la toma de decisiones de habitabilidad y reparabilidad de edificios después de un sismo. [Expert system for decision-making on habitability and reparability of buildings after an earthquake], Technical report, Alcaldía de Manizales, Oficina Municipal de Prevención y atención de Desastres, Manizales, Colombia.
8. -, 2004. Sistema experto para la evaluación post-sismica del daño en edificaciones-EDE Bogotá. [Expert system for post-earthquake building damage evaluation], CD-ROM, Bogotá, Colombia.
9. Barbat, A. H., Oller, S., Oñate, E., and Hanganu, A., 1997. Viscous damage model for Timoshenko beam structures, International Journal of Solids Structures 34, 3953-3976. (Pubitemid 127420095)
10. Cardona, O. D., 2001. Estimación Holística del Riesgo Sísmico utilizando Sistemas Dinámicos Complejos [Holistic seismic risk estimation using complex dynamic systems], http://www.desenredando.org/ public/varios/2001/ehrisusd/index.html, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
11. Carreño, M. L., 2001. Sistema Experto para la Evaluación del Daño Postsísmico en Edificios [Expert system for post-earthquake building damage evaluation], Master Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.
12. -, 2006. Técnicas innovadoras para la evaluación del riesgo sísmico y su gestión en centros urbanos: Acciones ex ante y ex post [Innovative techniques for the evaluation of seismic risk and its management in urban centers: ex ante and ex post actions], doctoral thesis, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
13. Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., and Barbat, A. H., 2006. Neuro-fuzzy assessment of building damage and safety after an earthquake, in Intelligent Computational Paradigms in Earthquake Engineering, Nikos D. Lagaros and Yiannis Tsompanakis, editors, Idea Group, Inc.
14. -, 2007a. Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach, Natural Hazards 40, 137-172.
15. -, 2007b. A disaster risk management performance index, Natural Hazards 41, 1-20.
16. Demartinos, K., and Dritsos, S., 2006. First-Level pre-earthquake assessment of buildings using fuzzy logic, Earthquake Spectra 22, 865-885. (Pubitemid 44970866)
17. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), 1999. Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology HAZUS, Technical Manual, Vol.I, II and III, first edition 1997, National Institute of Buildings Sciences of Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC.
18. -, 1998. Earthquake Evaluation of Earthquake Damaged Concrete and Masonry Wall Buildings, ATC-43 Project. Prepared for: The Partnership for Response and Recovery, Washington DC.
19. -, 2000. Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings, Prepared for SAC Joint Venture Partnership by Guidelines Development Committee, Washington DC.
20. Goretti, A., 2001. Post-Earthquake Building Usability: An Assessment. Technical Report SSN/ RT/01/03, Italy.
21. Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (IZIIS), 1984. Methodology and procedure for the evaluation of seismic damage, University Kiril and Metodij, Skopje, Yugoslavia.
22. Jang, J.-S. R., Sun, C. T., and Mizutani, E., 1997. Neuro-Fuzzy and Soft Computing. A Computational Approach to Learning and Machine Intelligence, Prentice-Hall London, UK.
23. Kohonen, T., 1982. Analysis of a simple self-organizing process, Biological Cybernetics 43, 59-69.
24. Kosko, B., 1992. Neural Networks and Fuzzy Systems: A Dynamical Systems Approach to Machine Intelligence, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
25. Nauck, D., Klawonn, F., and Kruse, R., 1997. Foundations of Neuro-Fuzzy Systems, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, England.
26. Oiler, S., and Barbat, A. H., 2006. Moment curvature damage for bridges subjected to seismic loads, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 195, 4490-4511.
27. Park, Y. J., Ang, A., and Wen, Y., 1984. Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of R. C. buildings, Structural Research Series, Report No 516, University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign, Urbana.
28. Rodríguez, M., and Castrillón, E., 1995. Manual de evaluación postsismica de la seguridad estructural de edificaciones. [Manual for post-earthquake evaluation of structural safety of buildings], Series del Instituto de Ingeniería 569, UNAM, México.
29. Rutkowska, D., 2002. Neuro-Fuzzy Architectures and Hybrid Learning, Physica Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany.
30. Sanchez-Silva, M., and García, L., 2001. Earthquake damage assessment based on fuzzy logic and neural networks, Earthquake Spectra 17, 89-112. (Pubitemid 33630072)
31. Singhal, A., and Kiremidjian, A., 2006. A method for earthquake motion-damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames. Technical Report NCEER-97-0008, Buffalo.
32. Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniería Sísmica (SMIS), 1998. Manual de evaluación postsísmica de la seguridad estructural de edificaciones [Manual of post-earthquake evaluation of the structural safety of buildings], Secretaria de Obras y Servicios Gobierno del Distrito Federal, Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniería Sísmica, México.
33. Stone, W. C., and Taylor, A. W., 1993. Seismic performance of circular bridge columns designed in accordance with ASHTO/CALTRANSstandards, NISTBuilding Science Series 170, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg MD.
34. Zadeh, L. A., 1965. Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8, 338-353.
35. -, 1975. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning, Information science, Part I, Vol.8, 199-249 Part II, Vol.8, 301-357, Part III, Vol.9, 43-80.
36. 1996. Fuzzy logic and the calculi of fuzzy rules and fuzzy graphs: a précis, Multiple Valued Logic 1, 1-38.
37. Zuccaro, G., and Papa, E, 2002. Multimedia handbook for seismic damage evaluation and post event macroseismic assessment, Proceedings, XXIII General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission, Genova (CD-ROM).