Neuro-fuzzy assessment of building damage and safety after an earthquake

Intelligent Computational Paradigms in Earthquake Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 123-157

  Carreño, Martha L ^a,c   Cardona, Omar D ^b   Barbat, Alex H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77749279091     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59904-099-8.ch007     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Ahlawat, A. S., & Ramaswamy, A. (2001). Multiobjective optimal structural vibration control using a fuzzy logic control system. Journal of Structural Engineering, 127(11), 1330-1337.
2. Anoop, M. B., Rao, K. B., & Rao, T. V. S. R. A. (2002). Application of fuzzy sets for estimating service life of reinforced concrete structural members in corrosive environments. Engineering structures, 24, 1229-1242.
3. Applied Technology Council. (1985). Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13. Redwood City, CA: Author.
4. Applied Technology Council. (1989). Procedures for postearthquake safety evaluation of buildings, ATC 20. Redwood City, CA: Author.
5. Applied Technology Council. (2003). Users manual: Mobile postearthquake building safety evaluation data acquisition system, ATC 20i (Version 1.0). Redwood City, CA: Author.
6. nd ed.). Redwood City, CA: Author.
7. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica. (2002). Guía técnica para inspección de edificaciones después de un sismo. Manual de Campo [Technical guideline for building evaluations after an earthquake. Field manual]. Bogotá, DC, Colombia: Author.
8. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica. (2003). Manual de Campo para inspección de edificios después de un sismo [Field manual for building evaluations after an earthquake]. Manizales, Colombia: Author.
9. Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica. (2004). Sistema experto para la evaluación post-sísmica del daño en edificaciones-EDE Bogotá [Expert system for the postseismic damage evaluation of buildings; CD-ROM]. Bogotá, Colombia: Author.
10. th, 1999, earthquake in the coffee growing-area]. Bogotá DC:Colombia: Ministerio de Desarrollo Económico.
11. Cardona, O. D. (2001). Estimación holística del riesgo sísmico utilizando sistemas dinámicos complejos [Holistic assessment of the seismic risk using complex dinamic systems]. Doctoral thesis, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain. Retrieved from http://www.desenredando.org/public/varios/2001/ehrisusd/index.html
12. Cardona, O. D. (2005). Sistema de indicadores para la gestión del riesgo de desastre: Informe técnico principal [Indicador system for disaster risk management of: Main technical report]. IDB/IDEA Program of indicators for disaster risk management, National University of Colombia, Manizales. Retrieved from http://idea.unalmzl.edu.co
13. Cardona, O. D. & Hurtado, J. E. (1992). Análisis de Vulnerabilidad Sísmica de Estructuras de Concreto Reforzado [Analysis of seismic vulnerability for reinforced concrete structures]. III Reunión del Concreto, Cartagena, Colombia.
14. Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., & Barbat, A. H. (2003). Expert system for post-earthquake building damage evaluation. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Civil and Structural Engineering Computing.
15. Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., & Barbat, A. H. (2004). Metodología para la evaluación del desempeño de la gestión del riesgo [Evaluation methodology for the performance of risk management]. Monographs on earthquake engineering, Barcelona, Spain: International Centre of Numerical Methods in Engineering.
16. Carreño, M. L., Cardona, O. D., & Barbat, A. H. (2005). Evaluación "ex-post" del estado de daño en los edificios afectados por un terremoto ["Ex post" evaluation of the damage state in buildings affected by an earthquake]. Monographs on earthquake engineering, Barcelona, Spain: International Centre of Numerical Methods in Engineering.
17. CENAPRED. (1996). Norma para la evaluación del nivel de daño por sismo en estructuras y guía técnica de rehabilitación (estructuras de concreto reforzado) [Guidelines for the evaluation of the seismic damage level in structures and technical guide for rehabilitation (reinforced concrete structures)]. Mexico: Author.
18. nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
19. Chou, J.-H., & Ghaboussi, J. (2001). Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection. Computers & Structures, 79, 1335-1353.
20. Cross V., & Sudkamp, T. (1991). Compatibility measures and aggregation operators for fuzzy evidential reasoning. Proceedings of the North American Fuzzy Information Processing Society, 13-17.
21. nd ed.). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
22. Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1982). On several representations of an uncertain body of evidence. In M. Gupta & E. Sanchez (Eds.), Fuzzy information and decision processes (pp. 167-181). North Holland.
23. st ed. 1997]. Washington, DC: National Institute of Buildings Sciences of Federal Emergency Management Agency.
24. Garcia, L. E. (1998). Dinámica estructural aplicada al diseño sísmico [Structural dynamics applied to the seismic design]. Bogotá, Colombia: Asociación Colombiana de Ingeniería Sísmica.
25. Goretti, A. (2001). Post-earthquake building usability: An assessment [Tech. Rep. No. SSN/RT/01/03]. Italy.
26. Hurtado, J. E. (2001). Neural networks in stochastic mechanics, Archives of computational methods in engineering State of the art reviews, 8(3), 303-342.
27. Instituto de Ingeniería Sísmica y Sismología. (1984). Metodología y procedimiento para la evaluación de daños producidos por terremotos [Methodology and procedure for the evaluation of seismic damage]. Skopje, Yugoslavia: Universidad "Kiril y Metodij."
28. Jang, J.-S. R., Sun C.-T., & Mizutani, E. (1997). Neuro-Fuzzy and soft computing. A computational approach to learning and machine intelligence. London: Prentice Hall.
29. Kosko, B. (1992). Neural networks and fuzzy systems: A dynamical systems approach to machine intelligence. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30. Lagaros, N. D., Papadrakakis, M., Fragiadakis, M., Stefanou, G., & Tsompanakis, Y. (2005). Recent developments in neural network aided stochastic computations and earthquake engineering. Paper presented at the International Symposium on Neural Networks and Soft Computing in Structural Engineering (NNSC-2005), Cracow, Poland.
31. Matsuoka, M., & Yamazaki, F. (2004). Use of satellite SAR intensity imagery for detecting building areas damaged due to earthquakes. EERI, Earthquake Spectra, 20(3), 975-994.
32. Nauck D., Klawonn F., & Kruse, R. (1997). Foundations of neuro-fuzzy systems. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
33. th intensive course, Local seismic cultures and earthquake vulnerability reduction in traditional masonry buildings, Ravello, Salerno, Italy.
34. Park, Y. J., Ang, A., & Wen, Y. (1984). Seismic damage analysis and damage-limiting design of R.C. buildings. Structural Research Series [Tech. Rep. No. 516]. Urbana: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
35. Rodríguez, M., & Castrillón, E. (1995). Manual de evaluación postsísmica de la seguridad estructural de edificaciones [Manual for postseismic evaluation of the structural safety of buildings]. Series del Instituto de Ingeniería, 569. UNAM, México: Instituto Nacional de Ingeniería.
36. Rutkowska, D. (2002). Neuro-fuzzy architectures and hybrid learning. Heidelberg, Germany: Physica Verlag.
37. Sanchez-Silva, M., & García, L. (2001). Earthquake damage assessment based on fuzzy logic and neural networks, EERI, Earthquake Spectra, 17(1), 89-112.
38. Sociedad Mexicana de Ingeniería Sísmica. (1998). Manual de evaluación postsísmica de la seguridad estructural de edificaciones [Manual for postseismic evaluation of the structural safety of buildings]. A. C. Secretaria de Obras y Servicios Gobierno del Distrito Federal, México: Author.
39. Song, B., Hao, S., Murakami, S., & Sadohara, S. (1996). Comprehensive evaluation method on earthquake damage using fuzzy theory. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 122(1), 1-31.
40. Stone, W. C., & Taylor, A. W. (1993). Seismic performance of circular bridge columns designed in accordance with AASHTO/CALTRANS standards (NIST Building Science Series, 170). Gaithersburg MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.
41. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
42. Zadeh, L. A. (1975). The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Information science (Part I, Vol. 8, pp.199-249; Part II, Vol.8, pp. 301-357; Part III, Vol. 9, pp. 43-80).
43. Zadeh, L. A. (1992). Fuzzy logic, neural networks and soft computing (One-page course announcement of CS 294-4, Spring 1993). Berkely: University of California at Berkeley.
44. Zadeh, L. A. (1996). Fuzzy logic and the calculi of fuzzy rules and fuzzy graphs: A precise, multiple valued logic (Vol. 1, pp. 1-38).
45. Zhao, Z., & Chen, C. (2002). A fuzzy system for concrete bridge damage diagnosis. Computers & Structures, 80, 629-641.
46. Zuccaro, G., & Papa, F. (2002). Multimedia handbook for seismic damage evaluation and post event macroseismic assessment [CD-ROM]. In Proceedings of the XXIII General Assembly of the European Seismological Commission.