Cost-effectiveness of external cephalic version for term breech presentation

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Tan, Jonathan M ^a   Macario, Alex ^b   Carvalho, Brendan ^b   Druzin, Maurice L ^b   El Sayed, Yasser Y ^b  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPUTER MODEL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DELIVERY; DRUG COST; ELECTIVE SURGERY; EMERGENCY SURGERY; EXTERNAL CEPHALIC VERSION; FETUS; HEALTH CARE COST; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABOR COMPLICATION; MEDICAL FEE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; ECONOMICS; EMERGENCY; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EMERGENCIES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; PATIENT SELECTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; UNITED STATES; VERSION, FETAL;

EID: 77749323229     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712393     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-3     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Kirmeyer S. Births: final data for 2004. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2006, 55:1-101.
2. Zhang J, Bowes WA, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol 1993, 82:306-312.
3. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD, Ventura SJ, Menacker F, Munson ML. Births: final data for 2002. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2003, 52:1-113.
4. Bingham P, Lilford RJ. Management of the selected term breech presentation: assessment of the risks of selected vaginal delivery versus cesarean section for all cases. Obstet Gynecol 1987, 69:965-978.
5. Philipson EH, Rosen MG. Trends in the frequency of cesarean births. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1985, 28:691-696. 10.1097/00003081-198528040-00002, 3878252.
6. James M, Hunt K, Burr R, Johanson R. A Decision Analytical Cost Analysis of Offering ECV in a UK District General Hospital. British Medical Journal 2001, 1.
7. Siddiqui D, Stiller RJ, Collins J, Laifer SA. Pregnancy outcome after successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999, 181:1092-1095. 10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70087-6, 10561624.
8. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicenter trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000, 356:1375-1383. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3, 11052579.
9. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hodnett ED, Chalmers B, Kung R, Willan A, Amankwah K, Cheng M, Helewa M, Hewson S, et al. Outcomes at 3 months after planned cesarean vs planned vaginal delivery for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Jama 2002, 287:1822-1831. 10.1001/jama.287.14.1822, 11939868.
10. Hannah ME, Whyte H, Hannah WJ, Hewson S, Amankwah K, Cheng M, Gafni A, Guselle P, Helewa M, Hodnett ED, et al. Maternal outcomes at 2 years after planned cesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the international randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004, 191:917-927. 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.08.004, 15467565.
11. Daskalakis G, Anastasakis E, Papantoniou N, Mesogitis S, Thomakos N, Antsaklis A. Cesarean vs. vaginal birth for term breech presentation in 2 different study periods. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2007, 96(3):162-6. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2006.09.035, 17270188.
12. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 2006, 108:235-237.
13. Walker R, Turnbull D, Wilkinson C. Strategies to address global cesarean section rates: a review of the evidence. Birth 2002, 29:28-39. 10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00153.x, 11843787.
14. Services USDoHaH Healthy People 2010: With Understanding and Improving Health and Objectives for Improving Health 2000, Washington DC: U.S Goverment Printing Office, 2, Services USDoHaH.
15. ACOG committee opinion. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. Number 265 December 2001 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002, 77:65-66. 10.1016/S0020-7292(02)80001-7, 12053896.
16. Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000, CD000083.
17. Hanss JW. The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990, 162:1459-1463. discussion 1463-1454.
18. ACOG Clinical Management Guidelines for Obstetrician-Gynecologists: External Cephalic Version. ACOG Practice Bulletin 2000, 13:380-385. ACOG.
19. Skupski D, Harrison-Restelli C, Dupont R. External Cephalic Version: an Approach with Few Complications. Gynecol Obstet invest 2003, 56:83-88. 10.1159/000072918, 12920344.
20. Chan LY, Tang JL, Tsoi KF, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Intrapartum cesarean delivery after successful external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004, 104:155-160.
21. Collins S, Ellaway P, Harrington D, Pandit M, Impey LW. The complications of external cephalic version: results from 805 consecutive attempts. BJOG 2007, 114:636-638. 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01271.x, 17355270.
22. Rozenberg P, Goffinet F, de Spirlet M, Durand-Zaleski I, Blanie P, Fisher C, Lang AC, Nisand I. External cephalic version with epidural anaesthesia after failure of a first trial with beta-mimetics. Bjog 2000, 107:406-410.
23. Neiger R, Hennessy MD, Patel M. Reattempting failed external cephalic version under epidural anesthesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998, 179:1136-1139. 10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70120-6, 9822489.
24. Kilpatrick SJ, Safford KL. Repeat external cephalic version. Is it worth the effort?. J Reprod Med 1995, 40:775-778.
25. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Jama 1996, 276:1253-1258. 10.1001/jama.276.15.1253, 8849754.
26. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990, 16:199-208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9, 10109801.
27. Chung A, Macario A, El-Sayed YY, Riley ET, Duncan B, Druzin ML. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol 2001, 97:932-941. 10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01355-2, 11384699.
28. Russo CAWL, Steiner C. Hospitalizatons Related to Childbirth. AHRQ HCUP Statistical Brief 2009, 71.
29. Macario A, El-Sayed YY, Druzin ML. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery depends on the a priori chance of success. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2004, 47:378-385. 10.1097/00003081-200406000-00011, 15166861.
30. Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F. The risks of lowering the cesarean-delivery rate. N Engl J Med 1999, 340:54-57. 10.1056/NEJM199901073400112, 9878648.
31. Gifford DS, Keeler E, Kahn KL. Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis. Obstet Gynecol 1995, 85:930-936. 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00044-R, 7770262.
32. Mauldin JG, Mauldin PD, Feng TI, Adams EK, Durkalski VL. Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996, 175:1639-1644. 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70118-7, 8987953.
33. Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C. External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol 1999, 94:783-786. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00378-6, 10546729.
34. Kok M, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, Post J, Opmeer B, Mol BW. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008, 199(6):630.e1-7.
35. Hutton EK, Saunders CA, Tu M, Stoll K, Berkowitz J. Factors associated with a successful external cephalic version in the early ECV trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008, 30:23-28.
36. Newman RB, Peacock BS, VanDorsten JP, Hunt HH. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993, 169:245-249. discussion 249-250.
37. Hofmeyr G. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2004, 1.
38. Kok M, Steeg JW, Mol BW, Opmeer B, Post JA. Which factors play a role in clinical decision-making in external cephalic version?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2008, 87:31-35. 10.1080/00016340701728075, 17957499.
39. Adams EK, Mauldin PD, Mauldin JG, Mayberry RM. Determining cost savings from attempted cephalic version in an inner city delivering population. Health Care Manag Sci 2000, 3:185-192. 10.1023/A:1019097525279, 10907321.
40. Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 2000, 27:256-263. 10.1046/j.1523-536x.2000.00256.x, 11251511.
41. Geary M, Fanagan M, Boylan P. Maternal satisfaction with management in labour and preference for mode of delivery. J Perinat Med 1997, 25:433-439. 10.1515/jpme.1997.25.5.433, 9438948.
42. Hildingsson I, Radestad I, Rubertsson C, Waldenstrom U. Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section. Bjog 2002, 109:618-623.
43. Chan L, Leung T, Fok W, Chan L, Lau T. Prediction of successful vaginal delivery in women undergoing external cephalic version at term for breech presentation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2004, 116:39-42. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.02.005, 15294365.
44. Egge T, Schauberger C, Schaper A. Dysfunctional labor after external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 1994, 83:771-773.
45. Devendra K. Introducing routine external cephalic version for the management of the malpresenting fetus near term. Med J Malaysia 2002, 57:454-459.
46. Impey L, Lissoni D. Outcome of external cephalic version after 36 weeks' gestation without tocolysis. J Matern Fetal Med 1999, 8:203-207. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6661(199909/10)8:5<203::AID-MFM1>3.0.CO;2-Y, 10475501.
47. Feyi-Waboso PA, Selo-Ojeme CO, Selo-Ojeme DO. External cephalic version (ECV): experience in a sub-Saharan African hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006, 26:317-320. 10.1080/01443610600594948, 16753680.
48. Collaris RJ, Oei SG. External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004, 83:511-518.