Determining the clinical efficacy and cost savings of successful external cephalic version

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 175, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 1639-1644

  Mauldin, J G ^a   Mauldin, P D ^a   Feng, T I ^a   Adams, E K ^a   Durkalski, V L ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Breech presentation; cost minimization; external cephalic version

Indexed keywords

TERBUTALINE SULFATE; UTERUS SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; COST CONTROL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LABOR COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL MORBIDITY; NEWBORN MORBIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

EID: 0030468396     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70118-7     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. CP Weiner Vaginal breech delivery in the 1990's Clini Obstet Gynecol 35 1992 559 569
2. JE Green F McLean LP Smith R. Usher Has an increased cesarean section rate for term breech delivery reduced the incidence of birth asphyxia, trauma, and death? Am J Obstet Gynecol 142 1981 643 648
3. AW Robertson JN Kopelman JA Read P Duff DJ Magelssen EE. Dashow External cephalic version at term: is a tocolytic necessary? Obstet Gynecol 70 1987 896 899
4. DP Eller JP. VanDorsten Breech presentation Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 5 1993 664 668
5. JW. Hanss The efficacy of external cephalic version and its impact on the breech experience Am J Obstet Gynecol 162 1990 1459 1464
6. JP VanDorsten BS Schifrin RL. Wallace Randomized control trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 141 1981 417 424
7. JC Morrison RE Myatt JN Martin GR Meeks RW Martin ET Bucovaz External cephalic version of the breech presentation under tocolysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 154 1986 900 903
8. RL Wallace JP VanDorsten GS Eglinton E Meuller D McCart BS. Schifrin External cephalic version with tocolysis: observations and continuing experience at the Los Angeles County/University of Southern California Medical Center J Reprod Med 29 1984 745 748
9. SJ Fortunato LJ Mercer DS. Guzick External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success Obstet Gynecol 72 1988 59 61
10. JE Ferguson MA Armstrong DC. Dyson Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version Obstet Gynecol 70 1987 722 725
11. RB Newman BS Peacock JP VanDorsten H. Hunt Predicting success of external cephalic version Am J Obstet Gynecol 169 1993 245 250
12. DG Kleinbaum LL Kupper KE. Muller Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods 2nd ed 1988 PWS-Kent Boston
13. AH Smith MN. Bates Confidence limit analyses should replace power calculations in the interpretation of epidemiologic studies Epidemiology 3 1991 449 452
14. SN Goodman JA. Berlin The use of predicted confidence intervals when planning experiments and the misuse of power when interpreting results Ann Intern Med 121 1994 200 206
15. LE Stine JP Phelan R Wallace GS Eglinton JP VanDorsten BS. Schifrin Update on external cephalic version performed at term Obstet Gynecol 65 1985 642 646
16. GJ. Hofmeyr Effect of external cephalic version in late pregnancy on breech presentation and caesarean section rate; a controlled trial Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90 1983 392 399
17. V Brocks T Philipsen NJ. Secher A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy Br J Obstet Gynaecol 91 1984 653 656
18. DS Gifford E Keeler KL Kahn Reductions in cost and cesarean rate by routine use of external cephalic version: a decision analysis Obstet Gynecol 85 1995 930 936