Major intraoperative neurologic monitoring deficits in consecutive pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients at one institution

Spine

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 240-245

  Kamerlink, Jonathan R ^a   Errico, Thomas ^a   Xavier, Shaun ^a   Patel, Ashish ^a   Patel, Amar ^a   Cohen, Alexa ^a   Reiger, Mark ^a   Dryer, Joseph ^a   Feldman, David ^a   Lonner, Baron ^a   Beric, Aleksandar ^a   Schwab, Frank ^a  

^a NYU HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES   (United States)

Author keywords

Neuromonitoring; Predictors of neurological deficits; Spinal deformity correction; Spine

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD VOLUME; BODY MASS; CHILD; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED MUSCLE RESPONSE; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; KYPHOSIS; LORDOSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE; NEUROMUSCULAR SCOLIOSIS; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; PATIENT MONITORING; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCHOOL CHILD; SCOLIOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MALFORMATION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; THORACOLUMBAR SPINE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; SPINAL CURVATURES; SPINAL FUSION; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 77749322243     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c7c8f6     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Forbes HJ, Allen PW, Waller CS, et al. Spinal cord monitoring in scoliosis surgery. Experience with 1168 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:487-91.
2. Dawson EG, Sherman JE, Kanim LE, et al. Spinal cord monitoring. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society and the European Spinal Deformity Society survey. Spine 1991;16(suppl 8):S361-4.
3. Nuwer MR, Dawson EG, Carlson LG, et al. Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;96:6-11.
4. Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Baldus C, et al. Major intraoperative neurologic deficits in pediatric and adult spinal deformity patients. Incidence and etiology at one institution. Spine 1998;23:324-31.
5. Manninen PH. Monitoring evoked potentials during spinal surgery in one institution. Can J Anaesth 1998;45(5 pt 1):460-5.
6. Padberg AM, Wilson-Holden TJ, Lenke LG, et al. Somatosensory and motor evoked potential monitoring without a wake-up test during idiopathic scoliosis surgery: an accepted standard of care. Spine 1998;23:1392-400.
7. Wilson-Holden TJ, Padberg AM, Lenke LG, et al. Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring for pediatric patients with spinal cord pathology undergoing spinal deformity surgery. Spine 1999;24:1685-92.
8. Noonan KJ, Walker T, Feinberg JR, et al. Factors related to false-versus true-positive neuromonitoring changes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis surgery. Spine 2002;27:825-30.
9. Pelosi L, Lamb J, Grevitt M, et al. Combined monitoring of motor and somatosensory evoked potentials in orthopaedic spinal surgery. Clin Neurophysiol 2002;113:1082-91.
10. Leung YL, Grevitt M, Henderson L, et al. Cord monitoring changes and segmental vessel ligation in the "at risk" cord during anterior spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2005;30:1870-4.
11. Eggspuehler A, Sutter MA, Grob D, et al. Multimodal intraoperative monitoring during surgery of spinal deformities in 217 patients. Eur Spine J 2007;16(suppl 2):S188-96.
12. Schwartz DM, Auerbach JD, Dormans JP, et al. Neurophysiological detection of impending spinal cord injury during scoliosis surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:2440-9.
13. Qiu Y, Wang S, Wang B, et al. Incidence and risk factors of neurological deficits of surgical correction for scoliosis: analysis of 1373 cases at one Chinese institution. Spine 2008;33:519-26.
14. Hsu B, Cree AK, Lagopoulos J, et al. Transcranial motor-evoked potentials combined with response recording through compound muscle action potential as the sole modality of spinal cord monitoring in spinal deformity surgery. Spine 2008;33:1100-6.
15. Ashkenaze D, Mudiyam R, Boachie-Adjei O, et al. Efficacy of spinal cord monitoring in neuromuscular scoliosis. Spine 1993;18:1627-33.
16. Chen X, Sterio D, Ming X, et al. Success rate of motor evoked potentials for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring: effects of age, lesion location, and preoperative neurologic deficits. J Clin Neurophysiol 2007;24:281-5.
17. Wiedemayer H, Sandalcioglu IE, Armbruster W, et al. False negative findings in intraoperative SEP monitoring: analysis of 658 consecutive neurosurgical cases and review of published reports. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75:280-86.
18. Stecker MM, Robertshaw J. Factors affecting reliability of interpretations of intra-operative evoked potentials. J Clin Monit Comput 2006;20:47-55.
19. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine 1993;18: 2231-8; discussion 2238-9.