2009 Walter C. Randall lecture in bioethics: Autonomy and consent in biobanks

Physiologist

Volumn 53, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Schwartz, Peter H ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOETHICS; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; NUCLEIC ACID DATABASE; PATIENT RIGHT; UNITED STATES;

BIOETHICS; DATABASES, NUCLEIC ACID; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; PATIENT RIGHTS; TISSUE BANKS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77749313093     PISSN: 00319376     EISSN: None     Source Type: Trade Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Andrews LB. Harnessing the benefits of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics. Spring 2005; 33 (1): 22-30.
2. Caulfield T. Biobanks and blanket consent: the proper place of the public good and public perception rationales King's Law Journal. 2007; 18: 209-226.
3. Caulfield T, Brown RB, Meslin EM. Challenging a well established consent norm?: One time consent for biobank research. Journal of International Biotechnology Law. 2007; 4: 69-74.
4. Caulfield, T and Kaye, J.. "Broad consent in biobanking: Reflections on seemingly insurmountable dilemmas." Medical Law International 2009:10: 85-100.
5. Caulfield T, Ries NM. Consent, privacy, and confidentiality in longitudinal, population helath research: the Canadian legal context. Health Law Journal. 2003; 11(Supplement 1): 1-65.
6. Caulfield T, Upshur RE, Daar A. DNA databanks and consent: a suggested policy option involving an authorization model. BMC Med Ethics. Jan 3 2003; 4: E1.
7. Department of Health and Human Services. Title 45: Public Welfare. Part 46: Protection of Human Subjects. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/ humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.htm. Accessed November 10, 2009.
8. Elger BS, Caplan AL. Consent and anonymization in research involving biobanks: differing terms and norms present serious barriers to an international framework. EMBO Rep. Jul 2006; 7(7): 661-666.
9. Gostin LO. Health information: reconciling personal privacy with the public good of human health. Health Care Anal. 2001; 9(3): 321-335.
10. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlson JA, Helgesson G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol. Mar 2006; 7 (3): 266-269.
11. Hofmann, B. "Broadening consent-and diluting ethics?" J Med Ethics 35(2): 125-129, 2009.
12. Kant I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
13. Knoppers BM, Kent A. "Policy barriers in coherent population-based research." Nature Reviews Genetics. 2006; 7: 8.
14. Mascalzoni D, Hicks A, Pramstaller P, Wjst M. Informed consent in the genomics era. PLoS Med. Sep 16 2008; 5(9): e192.
15. Mill JS. On Liberty; 1869.
16. Murphy, J, Scott J, et al. "Public perspectives on informed consent for biobanking." Am J Public Health 99 (12): 2128-34, 2009.
17. NBAC. Research Involving Human Biological Materials: Ethical Issues and Policy Guidance,Vol II: Commissioned papers. . Bethesda, MD: US Government Printing Office; 2000.
18. Nuremberg Code. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/ nuremberg.html
19. Park A. Biobanks. What's Next: 10 Ideas Changing the World Right Now. Available at: [http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/0,28757,1884779,00. html. Accessed Novemeber 10, 2009.
20. Petersen A. Biobanks' "engagements": engendering trust or engineering consent?' Genomics, Society and Policy. 2007; 3(No.1): 31-43.
21. Rawls J. A Theory of Justice: Original Edition Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2005.
22. Research NCftPoHSoBaB. The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Available at: http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html. Accessed November 10, 2009.
23. Rothstein MA. Expanding the ethical analysis of biobanks. J Law Med Ethics. Spring 2005; 33(1): 89-101.
24. Secko DM, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess MM. Informed consent in biobank research: a deliberative approach to the debate. Soc Sci Med. Feb 2009; 68 (4): 781-789.
25. Shklar JN. The liberalism of fear. In: Rosenblum NL, ed. Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989: 21-38.
26. Wendler D. One-time general consent for research on biological samples: is it compatible with the health insurance portability and accountability act? Arch Intern Med. Jul 24 2006; 166 (14):1449-1452.
27. Winickoff DE,Winickoff RN. The charitable trust as a model for genomic biobanks. N Engl J Med. Sep 18 2003; 349 (12): 1180-1184.
28. World Health Organization. Genetic databases: Assessing the benefits and the impact on human and patient rights. Available at: http://www.codex.vr.se/ texts/whofinalreport.rtf. Accessed January 5, 2010.