In vitro evaluation of metallic coronary artery stents with 64-MDCT using an ECG-Gated cardiac phantom: Relationship between in-stent visualization, stent type, and heart rate

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 194, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Kerl, J Matthias ^a   Schoepf, U Joseph ^b   Vogl, Thomas J ^a   Ackermann, Hanns ^a   Vogt, Sebastian ^c   Costello, Philip ^b   Herzog, Christopher ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery stents; CT; CT coronary angiography

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CORONARY STENT; DEVICE THERAPY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART RATE; IN VITRO STUDY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENOSIS;

CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CORONARY STENOSIS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART RATE; HUMANS; METALS; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77749301822     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.2318     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482-1487
2. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:552-557
3. Hoffmann MH, Shi H, Schmitz BL, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with multislice computed tomography. JAMA 2005; 293:2471-2478
4. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology 2007; 244:112-120
5. Maintz D, Juergens K, Wichter T, Grude M, Heindel W, Fischbach R. Imaging of coronary artery stents using multislice computed tomography: in vitro evaluation. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:830-835
6. Mahnken AH, Buecker A, Wildberger JE, et al. Coronary artery stents in multislice computed tomography: in vitro artifact evaluation. Invest Radiol 2004; 39:27-33
7. Oncel D, Oncel G, Tastan A, Tamci B. Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control. AJR 2008; 191:56-63
8. Wolf F, Feuchtner GM, Homolka P, et al. In vitro imaging of coronary artery stents: are there differences between 16- and 64-slice CT scanners? Eur J Radiol 2008; 68:465-470
9. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams R, Carnethon M, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2009 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009; 119:480-486
10. Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, et al. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med 2006; 355:2113-2124
11. Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM, et al. Restenosis after coronary stenting in current clinical practice. Am Heart J 1998; 135:510-518
12. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE, et al. Twoyear-plus follow-up of a paclitaxel-eluting stent in de novo coronary narrowings (TAXUS I). Am J Cardiol 2005; 96:79-82
13. Regar E, Serruys PW, Bode C, et al. Angiographic findings of the multicenter Randomized Study With the Sirolimus-Eluting Bx Velocity Balloon-Expandable Stent (RAVEL): sirolimus-eluting stents inhibit restenosis irrespective of the vessel size. Circulation 2002; 106:1949-1956
14. Lenzen MJ, Boersma E, Bertrand ME, et al. Management and outcome of patients with established coronary artery disease: the Euro Heart Survey on coronary revascularization. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1169-1179
15. Mahnken AH, Seyfarth T, Flohr T, et al. Flatpanel detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stents: phantom study in comparison with 16-slice spiral computed tomography. Invest Radiol 2005; 40:8-13
16. Pflederer T, Marwan M, Renz A, et al. Noninvasive assessment of coronary in-stent restenosis by dual-source computed tomography. Am J Cardiol 2009; 103:812-817
17. Ulzheimer S, Kalender WA. Assessment of calcium scoring performance in cardiac computed tomography. Eur Radiol 2003; 13:484-497
18. Herzog C, Abolmaali N, Balzer J, et al. Heart-rate-adapted image reconstruction in multidetector-row cardiac CT: influence of physiological and technical prerequisite on image quality. Eur Radiol 2002; 12:2670-2678
19. Schlosser T, Scheuermann T, Ulzheimer S, et al. In-vitro evaluation of coronary stents and 64-detector-row computed tomography using a newly developed model of coronary artery stenosis. Acta Radiol 2008; 49:56-64
20. Yorozuya M, Suzuki H, Iso Y, et al. Comparison of the morphological changes of restenosis after the implantation of various types of stents in a swine model. Coron Artery Dis 2002; 13:305-312
21. Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, et al. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation 1999; 100:1872-1878
22. Herzog C, Nguyen S, Savino G, et al. Does twosegment image reconstruction at 64-slice CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy? Radiology 2007; 244:121-129
23. Strotzer M, Lenhart M, Butz B, Volk M, Manke C, Feuerbach S. Appearance of vascular stents in computed tomographic angiography: in vitro examination of 14 different stent types. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:652-658
24. Hahnel S, Trossbach M, Braun C, et al. Smallvessel stents for intracranial angioplasty: in vitro comparison of different stent designs and sizes by using CT angiography. AJNR 2003; 24:1512-1516
25. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159-174
26. Scott EM, Delaney HD. Designing experiments and analyzing data: a model comparison perspective. Philadelphia, PA: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2004
27. Becker CR, Knez A, Leber A, et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses with multislice helical CT angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26:750-755
28. Nieman K, Cademartiri F, Lemos PA, Raaijmakers R, Pattynama PM, de Feyter PJ. Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 2002; 106:2051-2054
29. Pump H, Mohlenkamp S, Sehnert CA, et al. Coronary arterial stent patency: assessment with electron-beam CT. Radiology 2000; 214:447-452
30. Maintz D, Fischbach R, Juergens K, Allkemper T, Wessling J, Heindel W. Multislice CT angiography of the iliac arteries in the presence of various stents: in vitro evaluation of artifacts and lumen visibility. Invest Radiol 2001; 36:699-704
31. Kruger S, Mahnken A, Sinha A, et al. Multislice spiral computed tomography for the detection of coronary stent restenosis and patency. Int J Cardiol 2003; 89:167-172
32. Flohr T, Stierstorfer K, Raupach R, Ulzheimer S, Bruder H. Performance evaluation of a 64-slice CT system with z-flying focal spot. Rofo. 2004; 176:1803-1810
33. Maintz D, Seifarth H, Raupach R, et al. 64-slice multidetector coronary CT angiography: in vitro evaluation of 68 different stents. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:818-826
34. Flohr T, Bruder H, Stierstorfer K, Simon J, Schaller S, Ohnesorge B. New technical developments in multislice CT, part 2: sub-millimeter 16-slice scanning and increased gantry rotation speed for cardiac imaging. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 2002; 174:1022-1027
35. Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:256-268
36. Pugliese F, Weustink AC, Van Mieghem C, et al. Dual source coronary computed tomography angiography for detecting in-stent restenosis. Heart 2008; 94:848-854