Using population-based registries to study variations in health care

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 319-320

  Dodgion, Christopher M ^a   Greenberg, Caprice C ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SURVEY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; NOTE; PATHOLOGY; POPULATION RESEARCH;

EID: 77749298370     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.091041     Document Type: Note

References (11)

1. Du XL, Key CR, Dickie L, et al: Information on chemotherapy and hormone therapy from tumor registry had moderate agreement with chart reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 59:53-60, 2006
2. Malin JL, Kahn KL, Adams J, et al: Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:835-844, 2002
3. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. http://seer.cancer.gov/
4. National Cancer Institute: SEER-Medicare linked database. http://healthservices.cancer.gov/seermedicare/
5. University of Michigan: CanSORT: Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes Research Team. http://www.med.umich.edu/cansort
6. Hawley ST, Hofer TP, Janz NK, et al: Correlates of between-surgeon variation in breast cancer treatments. Med Care 44:609-616, 2006
7. Collins ED, Moore CP, Clay KF, et al: Can women with early-stage breast cancer make an informed decision for mastectomy? J Clin Oncol 27:519-525, 2009
8. Clegg LX, Reichman ME, Miller BA, et al: Impact of socioeconomic status on cancer incidence and stage at diagnosis: Selected findings from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results: National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Cancer Causes Control 20:417-435, 2009
9. Desch CE, McNiff KK, Schneider EC, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol 26:3631-3637, 2008
10. Schneider EC, Malin JL, Kahn KL, et al: Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality. J Clin Oncol 22:2985-2991, 2004
11. Coory M, Thompson B, Baade P, et al: Utility of routine data sources for feedback on the quality of cancer care: An assessment based on clinical practice guidelines. BMC Health Serv Res 9:84, 2009