Utility of routine data sources for feedback on the quality of cancer care: An assessment based on clinical practice guidelines

BMC Health Services Research

Volumn 9, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Coory, Michael ^a   Thompson, Bridie ^b   Baade, Peter ^c   Fritschi, Lin ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b Statistical Analysis Unit   (Australia)

^c VIERTEL CENTRE FOR RESEARCH IN CANCER CONTROL   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER REGISTRY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; METASTASIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROGNOSIS; AUSTRALIA; DISEASE COURSE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HOSPITAL PATIENT; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RECORD; NEOPLASM; REGISTER;

AUSTRALIA; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEEDBACK; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MEDICAL AUDIT; MEDICAL RECORDS; NEOPLASMS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGNOSIS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES;

EID: 67650714462     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726963     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-84     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Institute of Medicine, Council CoLSNR, Ensuring quality cancer care Washington, DC: National Academy Press 1999
2. The quality of early-stage breast cancer care. NA Bickell AH Aufses Jr MR Chassin, Ann Surg 2000 232 220 224 10903601 10.1097/00000658-200008000-00012
3. Insurance status and the use of guideline therapy in the treatment of selected cancers. L Harlan A Greene L Clegg M Mooney J Stevens M Brown, J Clin Oncol 2005 23 9079 9088 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.1297 16301598
4. Audit and feedback: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). G Jamtvedt J Young D Kristoffersen M Thomson O'Brien A Oxman, The Cochrane Library 2006 CD000259
5. Effect of the transformation of the Veterans Affairs Health Care System on the quality of care. AK Jha JB Perlin KW Kizer RA Dudley, N Engl J Med 2003 348 2218 2227 10.1056/NEJMsa021899 12773650
6. Trends in the quality of care and racial disparities in Medicare managed care. A Trivedi A Zaslavsky E Schneider, New Engl J Med 2005 353 692 700 10.1056/NEJMsa051207 16107622
7. The California Hospital Outcomes Project: how useful is California's report card for quality improvement? [see comment]. JA Rainwater PS Romano DM Antonius, Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1998 24 31 39 9494872
8. Completeness of information on adjuvant therapies for colorectal cancer in population-based cancer registries. RD Cress AM Zaslavsky DW West RE Wolf MC Felter JZ Ayanian, Med Care 2003 41 1006 1012 10.1097/01.MLR.0000083740.12949.88 12972840
9. Determining the quality of breast cancer care: do tumour registries measure up? N Bickell M Chassin, Annals of Internal Medicine 2000 132 705 710 10787363 (Pubitemid 30244169)
10. Validity of cancer registry data for measuring the quality of breast cancer care. JL Malin KL Kahn J Adams L Kwan M Laouri PA Ganz, J Natl Cancer Inst 2002 94 835 844 12048271 (Pubitemid 34705055)
11. The role of cancer registries in cancer control: a re-assessment from experience of the New South Wales Central Cancer Registry. B Armstrong, Journal of Registry Management 1999 26 51 55
12. The hospital-based cancer registry. J Young, Cancer Registration, Principles and Methods Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, Jensen O, Parkin D, MacLennan R, Muir C, Skeet R, 1991 177 184
13. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results, Summary Staging Manual 2000: Codes and Coding Instructions Bethesda: National Cancer Institute 2001
14. Public Health Division, NSW Clinical Cancer Data Collection for Outcomes and Quality Sydney: NSW Health Department 2001
15. National Cancer Data Base. Commission on Cancer, http://www.facs.org/ cancder/ncdb/indexhtml
16. Developing a system to assess the quality of cancer care: ASCO's national initiative on cancer care quality. EC Schneider JL Malin KL Kahn EJ Emanuel AM Epstein, J Clin Oncol 2004 22 2985 2991 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.087 15284249
17. Pitfalls fo converting practice guidelines in quality measures: lessons learnt from a VA performance measure. L Walter N Davidowitz P Heineken K Covinsky, JAMA 2004 291 2466 2470 10.1001/jama.291.20.2466 15161897
18. Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Colorectal Cancer Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council 2005
19. National Breast Cancer Centre, Management of Early Breast Cancer Canberra: National Health and Medical Reseach Council 2001
20. National Breast Cancer Centre, Management of Advanced Breast Cancer Canberra: National Health and Medical Reseach Council 2001
21. Australian Cancer Network, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention, Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council 2004
22. Australian Cancer Network, The Management of Cutaneous Melanoma Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council 1999
23. Australian Cancer Network, Clinical Practice Guidelines: Evidence-Based Information and Recommendations for the Management of Localised Prostate Cancer Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council 2002
24. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the appraisal of guidelines and research and evaluation instrument. J Burgers M Fervers M Haugh M Brouwers G Browman T Philip F Cluzeau, J Clin Oncol 2004 10 2000 2007 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.157
25. Collaborative Staging Manual and Coding Instructions, version 01.04.00. Collaborative Staging Task Force of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, Jointly published by American Joint Committee on Cancer (Chicago, IL) and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (Bethesda, MD) 2007 http://www. cancerstaging.org/cstage/manuals.html
26. T Threlfall J Wittorff P Boutdara L Fritchi J Heyworth P Katris H Sheiner, Collection of population-based cancer staging information in Western Australia a feasibility study Melbourne: National Cancer Control Initiative 2004
27. Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. CC Earle ER Park B Lai JC Weeks JZ Ayanian S Block, J Clin Oncol 2003 21 1133 1138 10.1200/JCO.2003.03.059 12637481
28. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. GS Cooper Z Yuan KC Stange LK Dennis SB Amini AA Rimm, Medical Care 2000 38 411 421 10.1097/00005650-200004000-00008 10752973
29. Profiling providers on use of adjuvant chemotherapy by combining cancer registry and medical record data. H Zheng R Yucel JZ Ayanian AM Zaslavsky, Medical Care 2006 44 1 7 10.1097/01.mlr.0000188910.88374.11 16365606
30. American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. C Desch K McNiff E Schneider D Schrag J McClure E Lepisto M Donaldson K Kahn J Weeks C Ko, J Clin Oncol 2008 26 3631 3637 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.5068 18640941
31. American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Nation Comprehensive Cancder Network (NCCN) Quality Measures. National Comprehensive Cancer Network, http://www.nccn.org/professionals/quality-measures/defaultasp
32. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. E Halm C Lee M Chassin, Ann Intern Med 2002 137 511 520 12230353 (Pubitemid 35024623)
33. Can cancer registry data be used to study cancer treatment? comment. JL Warren LC Harlan, Med Care 2003 41 1003 1005 10.1097/01.MLR.0000086827.00805.B5 12972839