Active upper limb prosthesis based on natural movement trajectories

Prosthetics and Orthotics International

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 58-72

  Ramírez García, Alfredo ^a   Leija, Lorenzo ^a   Muñoz, Roberto ^a  

^a DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Activities of daily living; Artificial neural network; Natural movements; Trans humeral prosthesis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM; ARM PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ELBOW FLEXION; FEMALE; FOREARM; HUMAN; HUMERUS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KINEMATICS; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NORMAL HUMAN; ORTHOSIS; RANGE OF MOTION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIDEORECORDING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REFERENCE VALUES; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77749298002     PISSN: 03093646     EISSN: 17461553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/03093640903463792     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Plettenburg DH. Upper extremity prosthetics: Current status & evaluation. 1st ed. The Netherlands: VSSD; 2006.
2. Utah Arm 3 (UA3): Motion Control/Utah Arm. [homepage on the internet] [cited 2008 April 22] Available from the website: http://www.utaharm.com/ua3.php
3. Escudero AZ. Doctoral thesis. Dept of Electrical Engineering, Bioelectronics Section, CINVESTAV-IPN, D. F., Mexico. 2002.
4. Escudero AZ, Alvarez J, Leija L. Development and characterisation of electromechanical muscles for driving trans-humeral myoelectric prostheses. Prosthet Orthot Int 2002;26:226-234.
5. Tee KP, Burdet E, Chew CM, Milner TE. A model of force and impedance in human arm movements. Biol Cybern 2004;90:368-375.
6. Iftime DS, Lindhardt L, Popovic MB. Automatic determination of synergies by radial basis function artificial neuronal networks for the control of a neural prosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13(4):482-489.
7. Biryukova EV, Roby-Brami A, Frolov AA, Mokhtari M. Kinematics of human arm reconstructed from spatial tracking system recordings. J Biomech 2000;33:985-995.
8. Williams S, Schmidt R, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. An upper body model for the kinematical analysis of the joint chain of the human arm. J Biomech 2006;39:2419-2429.
9. Ramanathan R, Eberhardt SP, Rahman T, Sample W, Seliktar R, Alexander M. Analysis of arm trajectories of everyday tasks for the development of an upper-limb orthosis. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000;8(1):60-70.
10. Romilly DP, Anglin C, Gosine RG, Hershler C, Raschke SU. A functional task analysis and motion simulation for the development of a powered upper-limb orthosis. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1994;2(3):119-129.
11. Magermans DJ, Chadwick EKJ, Veeger H, Van Der Helm FCT. Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. Clin Biomech 2005;20:591-599.
12. Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion. J Bone Joint Surg 1981;63(6):872-877.
13. Veldpaus FE, Woltring HJ, Dortmans LJMG. A least-squares algorithm for the equiform transformation from spatial marker co-ordinates. J Biomech 1988;21(1):45-54.
14. Schmidt R, Disselhorst-Klug C, Silny J, Rau G. A marker-based measurement procedure for unconstrained wrist and elbow motions. J Biomech 1999;32:615-621.
15. Hasan AT, Hamouda AMS, Ismail N, Al-Assadi HMAA. An adaptive-learning algorithm to solve the inverse kinematics problem of a 6 D.O.F serial robot manipulator. Adv Eng Softw 2006;37(7):432-438.
16. Karlik B, Aydin S. An improved approach to the solution of inverse kinematics problems for robot manipulators. Eng Appl Artif Intel 2000;13(2):159-164.
17. Al-Gallaf EA. Multi-fingered robot hand optimal task force distribution neural inverse kinematics approach. Robot Auton Syst 2006;54(1):34-51.
18. Mayorga RV, Sanongboon P. Inverse kinematics and geometrically bounded singularities prevention of redundant manipulators: An Artificial Neural Network approach. Robot Auton Syst 2005;53(3-4):164-176.
19. Cybenko G. Approximation by Superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signal Syst 1989;2:303-314.
20. Funahashi K. On the approximate realization of continuous mappings by neural networks. Neural Networks 1989;2(3):183-192.
21. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H. Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Networks 1989;2(5):359-366.
22. Hagan MT, Demuth BH, Beale M. Neural Network Design. Boston: PWS Publishing Company; 1996.
23. Demuth BH, Beale M. Neural Network TOOLBOX User's Guide. The MATH WORKS INC; 2002.
24. Winter DA. Camera speeds for normal and pathological gait analysis. Med Biol Comput 1982;20:408-412.