Biological significance of low weed population densities on sweet corn

Agronomy Journal

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 464-468

  Williams II, Martin M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL SIGNIFICANCE; CROP DEVELOPMENT; CROP GROWTH; CROP PLANTS; INDIRECT ASSOCIATION; MARKET TYPES; PATH ANALYSIS; PLANT HEIGHT; POPULATION DENSITIES; SWEET CORNS; WEED MANAGEMENT; WEED PLANTS; YIELD LOSS;

PLANTS (BOTANY); POPULATION DYNAMICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILK;

CROPS;

AMBROSIA; AMBROSIA TRIFIDA; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 77749252325     PISSN: 00021962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/agronj2009.0308     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bruce, W.B., G.O. Edmeades, and T.C. Barker. 2002. Molecular and physiological approaches to maize improvement for drought tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 53:13-25.
2. Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer Verlag, New York.
3. Harrison, S.K., E.E. Regnier, J.T. Schmoll, and J.E. Webb. 2001. Competition and fecundity of giant ragweed in corn. Weed Sci. 49:224-229.
4. Johnson, R.A., and D.W. Wichern. 2002. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 5th ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
5. Jordan, N. 1989. A statistical analysis for area-of-influence experiments. Weed Technol. 3:114-121.
6. Kiefer, J. 1959. K-sample analogues of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Cramervon mises tests. Ann. Math. Stat. 30:420-447.
7. Liu, J.G., K.J. Mahoney, P.H. Sikkema, and C.J. Swanton. 2009. The importance of light quality in crop-weed competition. Weed Res. 49:217-224.
8. Mitchell, R.J. 2001. Path analysis: Pollination. p. 217-234. In S.M. Scheiner and J. Gurevitch (ed.) Design and analysis of ecological experiments. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
9. Neter, J., M.H. Kutner, C.J. Nachtsheim, and W. Wasserman. 1996. Applied linear statistical models. Irwin, Chicago.
10. Pagano, E., and G.A. Maddoni. 2007. Intra-specific competition in maize: Early established hierarchies differ in plant growth and biomass partitioning to the ear around silking. Field Crops Res. 101:306-320.
11. So, Y.F., M.M. Williams, II, J.K. Pataky, and A.S. Davis. 2009. Principal canopy factors of sweet corn and relationships to competitive ability with wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum). Weed Sci. 57:296-303.
12. Terra, B.R.M., A.R. Martin, and J.L. Lindquist. 2007. Corn-velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) interference is affected by sublethal doses of postemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 55:491-496.
13. Tollenaar, M., W. Deen, L. Echarte, and W. Liu. 2006. Effect of crowding stress on dry matter accumulation and harvest index in maize. Agron. J. 98:930-937.
14. Tracy, W.F. 2001. Sweet corn. p. 155-197. In A.R. Hallauer (ed.) Specialty corns. 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. Williams, M.M., II. 2006. Planting date influences critical period of weed control in sweet corn. Weed Sci. 54:928-933.
16. Williams, M.M., II, and J.L. Lindquist. 2007. Influence of planting date and weed interference on sweet corn growth and development. Agron. J. 99:1066-1072.
17. Williams, M.M., II, and J.B. Masiunas. 2006. Functional relationships between giant ragweed interference and sweet corn yield and ear traits. Weed Sci. 54:948-953.
18. Williams, M.M., II, T.L. Rabaey, and C.M. Boerboom. 2008. Residual weeds of sweet corn in the north central region. Weed Technol. 22:646-653.