Principal canopy factors of sweet corn and relationships to competitive ability with wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum)

Weed Science

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 296-303

  So, Yim F ^a   Williams, Martin M ^a   Pataky, Jerald K ^a   Davis, Adam S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Crop tolerance; Cultural weed control; Factor analysis; Integrated weed management; Interference; Phenology; Weed suppressive ability

Indexed keywords

CANOPY; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; COMPETITIVENESS; CULTIVAR; EMERGENCE; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; MAIZE; MATURATION; MILLET; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOLOGY; PHOTOSYNTHETICALLY ACTIVE RADIATION; WEED CONTROL;

PANICUM MILIACEUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 66949144308     PISSN: 00431745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WS-08-158.1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Anderson, R. L. 2000. Ecology and interference of proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) in semi-arid corn. Weed Technol. 14:45-50.
2. Azanza, F., A. B. Zur, and J. Juvik. 1996. Variation in sweet corn characteristics associated with stand establishment and eating quality. Euphytica 87:7-18.
3. Begna, S. H., R. I. Hamilton, L. M. Dwyer, D. W. Stewart, D. Cloutier, L. Assemat, K. Foroutan-Pour, and D. L. Smith. 2001a. Weed biomass production response to plant spacing and corn (Zea mays) hybrids differing in canopy architecture. Weed Technol. 15:647-653.
4. Begna, S. H., D. L. Smith, R. I. Hamilton, L. M. Dwyer, and D. W. Stewart. 2001b. Corn genotypic variation effects on seedling emergence and leaf appearance of short-season areas. J. Agro. Crop Sci. 186:267-271.
5. Bennett, A. C. and D. R. Shaw. 2000. Effect of Glycine max cultivar and weed control on weed seed characteristics. Weed Sci. 48:431-435.
6. Callaway, B. M. 1992. A compendium of crop varietal tolerance to weeds. Am. Alt. Agric. 7:169-180.
7. Ford, G. T. and J. M. Pleasant. 1994. Competitive ability of six corn (Zea mays) hybrids with four weed control practices. Weed Technol. 8:124-128.
8. Horvath, D. P., R. Gulden, and S. A. Clay. 2006. Microarray analysis of lateseason velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) effect on corn. Weed Sci. 54:983-994.
9. Horvath, D. P., D. Llewellyn, and S. A. Clay. 2007. Heterologous hybridization of cotton microarrays with velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) reveals physiological response due to corn competition. Weed Sci. 55:546-557.
10. Jannink, J. L., N. R. Jordan, and J. H. Orf. 2001. Feasibility of section for high weed suppressive ability in soybean: absence of tradeoffs between rapid initial growth and sustained later growth. Euphytica 120:291-300.
11. Jannink, J. L., J. H. Orf, N. R. Jordan, and R. G. Shaw. 2000. Index selection for weed suppressive ability in soybean. Crop Sci. 40:1087-1094.
12. Johnson, D. E. 1998. Applied Multivariate Methods for Data Analysts. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Pp. 191-212.
13. Jordan, N. 1993. Prospects for weed control through crop interference. Ecol. Appl. 3:84-91.
14. Lemerle, D., A. Smith, B. Verbeek, E. Koetz, P. Lockley, and P. Martin. 2006. Incremental crop tolerance to weeds: a measure for selecting competitive ability in Australian wheats. Euphytica 149:85-95.
15. Lindquist, J. L. and D. A. Mortensen. 1998. Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci. 46:569-574.
16. Lindquist, J. L., D. A. Mortensen, and B. E. Johnson. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J. 90:787-792.
17. Makus, D. J. 2000. Performance of two sweet corn cultivars grown under conservation tillage and with-in-row weed pressure. Subtropical Plant Sci. 52:18-22.
18. Nordby, J. N., M. M. Williams II, J. K. Pataky, and D. E. Riechers. 2008. A common genetic basis in sweet corn inbred Cr1 for cross sensitivity to multiple cytochrome P450-metabolized herbicides. Weed Science 56:376-382.
19. Ott, R. L. and M. Longnecker. 2001. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. 5th ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury. Pp. 368-371.
20. Pataky, J. K., J. N. Nordby, M. M. Williams II, and D. E. Riechers. 2006. Inheritance of cross-sensitivity in sweet corn to herbicides applied postemergence. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131:744-751.
21. Ritchie, S. W., J. J. Hanway, G. O. Benson, and J. C. Herman. 1993. How a Corn Plant Develops. http://www.biologie.uni-hamburg.de/b-online/library/ maize/www.ag.iastate.edu/departments/agronomy/corngrows.html. Accessed: December 16, 2008.
22. Roggenkamp, G. J., S. C. Mason, and A. R. Martin. 2000. Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis) response to corn (Zea mays) hybrid. Weed Technol. 14:304-311.
23. Sankula, S., M. J. VanGessel, and R. R. Mulford. 2004. Corn leaf architecture as a tool for weed management in two production systems.Weed Sci. 52:1026-1033.
24. SAS Institute. 2002. User's Guide: Statistics. Cary, NC: SAS Institute. Shenk, M. D., W. S. Braunworth Jr., R. J. Fernandez, D. W. Curtis, D. McGrath, and R. D. William. 1990. Wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 4:440-445.
25. So, Y. F., M. M. Williams II, and J. K. Pataky. 2009. Weed interference differentially affects canopy architecture and yield components of 25 sweet corn hybrids. HortScience. In press.
26. Swanton, C. J., R. H. Gulden, and K. Chandler. 2007. A rationale for atrazine stewardship in corn. Weed Sci. 55:75-81.
27. Toler, J. E., E. C. Murdock, G. S. Stapleton, and S. U. Wallace. 1999. Corn leaf orientation effects on light interception, intraspecific competition, and grain yields. J. Prod. Agric. 12:369-399.
28. Tollenaar, M., A. Aguilera, and S. P. Nissanka. 1997. Grain yield is reduced more by weed interference in an old than in a new maize hybrid. Agron. J. 89:239-246.
29. Tracy, W. F. 2001. Sweet corn. Pages 155-197 in A. R. Hallauer, ed. Specialty Corns. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
30. Williams, B. J. and R. G. Harvey. 2000. Effect of nicosulfuron timing on wildproso millet (Panicum miliaceum) control in sweet corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:377-382.
31. Williams, M. M. II, R. A. Boydston, and A. S. Davis. 2006. Canopy variation among three sweet corn hybrids and implications for light competition. HortScience 41:1449-1454.
32. Williams, M. M. II, R. A. Boydston, and A. S. Davis. 2007. Wild proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) suppressive ability among three sweet corn hybrids. Weed Sci. 55:245-251.
33. Williams, M. M. II, R. A. Boydston, and A. S. Davis. 2008a. Crop competitive ability contributes to herbicide performance in sweet corn. Weed Res. 48:58-67.
34. Williams, M. M. II, R. A. Boydston., and A. S. Davis. 2008b. Differential tolerance in sweet corn to wild-proso millet (Panicum miliaceum) interference. Weed Sci. 56:91-96.
35. Williams, M. M. II, R. L. Rabaey, and C. M. Boerboom. 2008c. Residual weeds of sweet corn in the north central region. Weed Technol. 22:646-653.
36. Zhao, D. L., G. N. Atlin, L. Bastiaans, and J.H.J. Spiertz. 2006. Cultivar weedcompetitiveness in aerobic rice: heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed-free environments. Crop Sci. 46:372-380.