The impact of structural complexity on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams

Information Sciences

Volumn 180, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2209-2220

  Cruz Lemus, José A ^a   Maes, Ann ^b   Genero, Marcela ^a   Poels, Geert ^b   Piattini, Mario ^a  

^a UCLM Indra Research and Development Institute ^*  (Spain)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Empirical validation; Experiment; Metrics; Model quality; Prediction; Statechart diagram; Structural complexity; UML; Understandability

Indexed keywords

EMPIRICAL VALIDATION; MODEL QUALITIES; STATE CHART DIAGRAMS; STRUCTURAL COMPLEXITY; UNDERSTANDABILITY;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; LINGUISTICS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; QUALITY ASSURANCE; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EXPERIMENTS;

EID: 77649337375     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2010.01.026     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Atkinson C., and Kühne T. Model driven development: a metamodeling foundation. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 20 (2003) 36-41
2. A.L. Baroni, S. Braz, F. Brito e Abreu, Using OCL to formalize object-oriented design metrics definitions, in: 6th ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering (QAOOSE 2002), 2002. Malaga, Spain.
3. Basili V., Caldiera G., and Rombach H.D. Goal question metric paradigm. Encyclopaedia of Software Engineering 1 (1994) 528-532
4. Basili V., Shull F., and Lanubile F. Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25 (1999) 456-473
5. Bernardez B., Durán A., and Genero M. Metrics for use cases: a survey of current proposals. In: Genero M., Piattini M., and Calero C. (Eds). Metrics for Software Conceptual Models (2005), Imperial College Press, UK
6. Bodart F., Patel A., Sim M., and Weber R. Should optimal properties be used in conceptual modelling? A theory and three empirical tests. Information Systems Research 12 4 (2001) 384-405
7. Bolloju N., and Leung F.S.K. Assisting novice analysts in developing quality conceptual models with UML. Communications of the ACM 49 7 (2006) 108-112
8. Briand L., Bunse C., and Daly J. A controlled experiment for evaluating quality guidelines on the maintainability of object-oriented designs. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27 6 (2001) 513-530
9. Briand L., Morasca S., and Basili V. Property-based software engineering measurement. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 22 1 (1996) 68-86
10. L. Briand, J. Wüst, S. Ikonomovski, H. Lounis, Investigating quality factors in object-oriented designs: an industrial case-study, in: 21st International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 99), 1999. Los Angeles, USA.
11. L. Briand, J. Wüst, H. Lounis, A comprehensive investigation of quality factors in object-oriented designs: an industrial case study, 1998, International Software Engineering Research Network.
12. Briand L., Wüst J., and Lounis H. Replicated case studies for investigating quality factors in object-oriented designs. Empirical Software Engineering 6 1 (2001) 11-58
13. Cant S.N., Jeffery D.R., and Henderson-Sellers B. A conceptual model of cognitive complexity of elements of the programming process. Information and Software Technology 7 351-362 (1995)
14. M. Carbone, G. Santucci, Fast && Serious: a UML-based metric for effort estimation, in: 6th International ECOOP Workshop on Quantitative Approaches in Object-Oriented Software Engineering (QAOOSE 2002), 2002. Malaga, Spain.
15. Cartwright M., and Shepperd M. An empirical investigation of an object-oriented software system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26 8 (2000) 786-796
16. Clavel M., Durán F., Eker S., Lincoln P., Mari{dotless}́nez-Oliet N., Meseguer J., and Talcott C. Maude 2.1.1 Manual (2003), University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
17. Cruz-Lemus J.A. A measurement-based approach for assessing UML statechart diagrams understandability. Department of Technologies and Systems Technologies (2007), University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain, Ciudad Real
18. J.A. Cruz-Lemus, M. Genero, M. Piattini, Validating metrics for UML statechart diagrams through a family of experiments, in: 1st International Workshop on Software Metrics and DASMA Software Metrik Kongress (MetriKon 2004), 2004. Könings Wusterhausen, Germany.
19. Cruz-Lemus J.A., Genero M., and Piattini M. Chapter 7: metrics for UML statechart diagrams. Metrics for Software Conceptual Models (2005), Imperial College Press, United Kingdom
20. J.A. Cruz-Lemus, M. Genero, M.E. Manso, M. Piattini, Evaluating the effect of composite states on the understandability of UML statechart diagrams, in: MODELS 2005 - LNCS 3713, 2005.
21. El-Emam K., Benlarbi S., Goel N., and Rai S. The confounding effect of class size on the validity of object-oriented metrics. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 27 7 (2001) 630-650
22. El-Emam K., and Melo W. The Prediction of Faulty Classes using Object-oriented Design Metrics (1999), National Research Council of Canada
23. J. Erickson, K. Siau, Thoretical and Practical Complexity of UML, in: 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems, 2004. New York, USA.
24. Fenton N., and Pfleeger S. Software Metrics: a Rigurous and Practical Approach (1997), International Thomson Computer Press, UK
25. Garci{dotless}́a F., Serrano M., Cruz-Lemus J.A., Ruiz F., and Piattini M. Managing software process measurement: a metamodel-based approach. Information Sciences 177 (2007) 2570-2586
26. Genero M. Defining and validating metrics for conceptual models. Computer Science Department (2002), University of Castilla - La Mancha, Spain
27. Genero M., Manso M.E., Visaggio C.A., and Piattini M. Building measure-based prediction models for UML class diagram maintainability. Empirical Software Engineering 12 5 (2007) 517-549
28. M. Genero, D. Miranda, M. Piattini, Defining metrics for UML statechart diagrams in a methodological way, in: IWCMQ 2003 - LNCS 2814, 2003.
29. In: Genero M., Piattini M., and Calero C. (Eds). Metrics for Software Conceptual Models (2005), Imperial College Press., United Kingdom
30. Gorusch R.L. Factor Analysis (1983), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale - New Jersey, USA
31. B. Henderson-Sellers, D. Zowghi, T. Klemola, S. Parasuram, Sizing use cases: how to create a standard metrical approach, in: 8th International Conference on Object-Oriented Information Systems (OOIS 2002), 2002. Montpellier, France: LNCS 2425.
32. B. Höst, B. Regnell, C. Wohlin, Using students as subjects - a comparative study of students & proffesionals in lead-time impact assessment, in: 4th Conference on Empirical Assessment & Evaluation in Software Engineering (EASE 2000), 2000. Keele, UK.
33. Kitchenham B., Pfleeger S., Pickard L., Jones P., Hoaglin D., El-Emam K., and Rosenberg J. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 8 (2002) 721-734
34. Korenius T., Laurikkala J., and Juhola M. On principal component analysis, cosine and euclidean measures in information retrieval. Information Sciences 177 22 (2007) 4893-4905
35. V. Lam, J. Padget, Symbolic model checking of UML statechart diagrams with an integrated approach, in: 11th IEEE International Conference and Workshop on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, 2004. Brno, Czech Republic.
36. Lorch R., and Myers J. Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16 1 (1990) 149-157
37. M.E. Manso, M. Genero, M. Piattini, No-redundant metrics for UML class diagram structural complexity, in: 15th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE 2003), 2003. Klagenfurt, Austria: LNCS (2681).
38. McCabe T.J. A complexity measure. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 2 5 (1976) 308-320
39. Miller J. Applying meta-analytical procedures to software engineering experiments. Journal of Systems and Software 54 (2000) 29-39
40. D. Miranda, M. Genero, M. Piattini, Empirical validation of metrics for UML statechart diagrams, in: 5th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS 2003), 2003. Angers, France.
41. OMG, MDA - The OMG Model Driven Architecture, 2002. Object Management Group.
42. OMG, Unified Modeling Language Specification, v.1.4.2. 2005. Object Management Group & International Organization for Standarization.
43. OMG, Object Constraint Language, version 2.0. 2006. Object Management Group.
44. OMG, Unified Modeling Language Specification v.2.1.1. 2007. Object Management Group.
45. Pippinger. Complexity theory. Scientific American 238 6 (1978) 1-15
46. Poels G., and Dedene G. Distance-based software measurement: necessary and sufficient properties for software measures. Information and Software Technology 42 1 (2000) 35-46
47. G. Poels, G. Dedene, Measures for assessing dynamic complexity aspects of object-oriented conceptual schemes, in: 19th International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER 2000), 2000. Salt Lake City, USA.
48. G. Poels, G. Dedene, Evaluating the effect of inheritance on the modifiability of object-oriented business domain models, in: 5th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2001), 2001. Lisbon (Portugal).
49. Saeki M. Embedding metrics into information system development methods: an application of method engineering technique. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2681 (2003) 374-389
50. F. Shull, J. Carver, G. Travassos, J. Maldodano, R. Conradi, V. Basili, Replicated studies: building a body of knowledge about software reading techniques, in: Lecture Notes on Empirical Software Engineering, J.N. and M.A., (Ed.), 2003. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 39-84.
51. Siau K. Information modeling and method engineering: a psychological perspective. Journal of Database Management 10 44-50 (1999)
52. Winer B.J., Brown D.R., and Michels K.M. Statistical Principles in Experimental Design (1991), McGraw-Hill
53. Wohlin C., Runeson P., Hast M., Ohlsson M.C., Regnell B., and Wesslen A. Experimentation in Software Engineering: an Introduction (2000), Kluwer Academic Publisher
54. S. Yusuf, H. Kagdi, J.I. Maletic, Assessing the comprehension of UML class diagrams via eye tracking, in: 15th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC'07), 2007. Banff, Canada.