Academetron, automaton, phantom: Uncanny digital pedagogies

London Review of Education

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-13

  Bayne, Siân ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Course design; Digital; Hauntology; Pedagogy; Uncanny

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649332670     PISSN: 14748460     EISSN: 14748479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14748460903557589     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ascott, R. 2003. Telematic embrace: Visionary theories of art, technology, and consciousness. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
2. Barnett, R. 2005. Recapturing the universal in the university. Educational Philosophy and Theory 27, no. 6: 785-97.
3. Barnett, R. 2007. A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Buckingham: Society for Research in Higher Education.
4. Bayne, S. 2006. Temptation, trash and trust: The authorship and authority of digital texts. E-learning 3, no. 1: 16-26.
5. Bayne, S. 2008a. Uncanny spaces for higher education: Teaching and learning in virtual worlds. Alt-J, Research in Learning Technology 16, no. 3: 197-205.
6. Bayne, S. 2008b. Higher education as a visual practice: Seeing through the virtual learning environment. Teaching in Higher Education 13, no. 4: 395-410.
7. Boon, S., and C. Sinclair. 2009. A world I don't inhabit: Disquiet in identity and Facebook. Educational Media International 46, no. 2: 99-111.
8. Bradwell, P. 2009. The edgeless university: Why higher education must embrace technology. London: Demos.
9. Carrington, V. 2005. The uncanny, digital texts and literacy. Language and Education 19, no. 6: 467-82.
10. Carter, L. 2003. Argument in hypertext: Writing strategies and the problem of order in a nonsequential world. Computers and Composition 20, no. 1: 3-22.
11. Cousin, G. 2005. Learning from cyberspace. In Education in cyberspace, ed. R. Land and S. Bayne, 117-29. London: Routledge.
12. Coyne, R. 2005. The digital uncanny. In Spaces, spatiality and technology, ed. P. Turner and E. Davenport, 5-18. Dordecht: Springer.
13. Davis, C. 2005. État Présent: Hauntology, spectres and phantoms. French Studies 59, no. 3: 373-9.
14. Derrida, J. 1994. Spectres of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and the New International. London: Routledge.
15. Eisenstein, E. 1980. The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early-modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Freud, S. 2003. The uncanny. London: Penguin Classics.
17. Goodfellow, R., and M. Lea. 2007. Challenging e-learning in the university: A literacies perspective. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
18. Grenville, B. 2001. The uncanny: Experiments in cyborg culture. Vancouver, BC: Vancouver art gallery, Arsenal pulp press.
19. Haughton, H. 2003. Introduction. In The uncanny, S. Freud, vii-lx. London: Penguin Classics.
20. Hoefling, T. 2003. Working virtually: Managing people for successful virtual teams and organizations. Washington: Stylus Publishing.
21. Hook, D. 2005. Monumental space and the uncanny. Geoforum 36: 688-704.
22. Jentsch, E. 1908. Zur psychologie des unheimlichen, Psychiatrisch-neurologische Wochenschrift, no. 22, 23.
23. Kochhar-Lindgren, G. 2009. The haunting of the university: Phantomenology and the house of learning. Pedagogy: critical approaches to teaching literature, language, composition and culture 9, no. 1: 3-12.
24. k-punk. 2006. Phonograph blues. http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/008535.html.
25. Kristeva, J. 1991. Strangers to ourselves. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
26. Lacan, J. 1977. Ecrits: A selection. London: Routledge.
27. Landow, G. 1997. Hypertext 2.0: The convergence of contemporary critical theory and technology. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. Meyer, J.H.F., and R. Land. 2005. Threshold concepts: An introduction. In Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, ed. J.H.F. Meyer and R. Land, 3-18. London: Routledge Falmer.
29. Perkins, D. 1999. The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership 57, no. 3: 6-11.
30. Perkins, D. 2006. Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge, ed. J.H.F. Meyer and R. Land, 33-47. London: Routledge Falmer.
31. Poster, M. 2001. What's the matter with the internet? Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
32. Ramey, C.H. 2005. The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots. In Proceedings of Views of the Uncanny Valley Workshop: IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (pp. 8-13). Tsukuba, Japan.
33. Royle, N. 2003. The uncanny. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
34. Shin, D.-s., and T. Cimasko. 2008. Multimodal composition in a college ESL class: New tools, traditional norms. Computers and Composition 25, no. 4: 376-95.
35. Weight, J. 2006. I, apparatus, you: A technosocial introduction to creative practice. Convergence: the International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 12, no. 4: 413-46.