Opportunities, rational choice, and self-control: On the interaction of person and situation in a general theory of crime

Crime and Delinquency

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 167-197

  Seipel, Christian ^a   Eifler, Stefanie ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HILDESHEIM   (Germany)

^b BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

General theory; High cost situations; Low cost situations; Opportunity; Rational choice; Self control; Situational analysis; Theoretical integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649287774     PISSN: 00111287     EISSN: 1552387X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0011128707312525     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abelson, R.P. (1976). Script processing in attitude formation and decision making. In J. S. Carrol & J. W. Payne (Eds.), Cognition and social behaviour (pp. 33-45). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3. Arneklev, B.J., Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., & Bursik, R.J., Jr. (1993). Low self-control and imprudent behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 9, 225-247.
4. Bachmann, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review, 26, 343-372.
5. Baron, S.W. (2003). Self-control, social consequences, and criminal behavior: Street youth and the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40, 403-425.
6. Blossfeld, H.-P., & Timm, A. (1997). Der Einfluß des Bildungssystems auf den Heiratsmarkt. [The influence of the educational system on the marriage market). Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 49, 440-476.
7. Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: John Wiley.
8. Brownfield, D., & Sorenson, A.M. (1993). Self-control and juvenile delinquency: Theoretical and an empirical assessment of selected elements of a general theory of crime. Deviant Behavior, 14, 243-264.
9. Chapple, C.L., & Hope, T.L. (2003). An analysis of the self-control and criminal versatility of gang and dating violence offenders. Violence and Victims, 18, 671-690.
10. Clarke, R.V. (1980). Situational crime prevention: Theory and praxis. British Journal of Criminology, 20, 136-147.
11. Clarke, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Situational crime prevention: Successful case studies (2nd ed.). New York: Harrow and Heston.
12. Clarke, R.V., & Cornish, D.B. (1985). Modelling offenders decisions: A framework for research and policy. Crime and Justice, 6, 147-185.
13. Cohen, L.E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44, 588-608.
14. Cornish, D. B., & Clarke, R. V. (Eds.). (1986). The reasoning criminal: Rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer.
15. DeLi, S. (2004). The impacts of self-control and social bonds on juvenile delinquency in a national sample of midadolescents. Deviant Behavior, 25, 351-373.
16. Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1992). Persönliches Umweltverhalten. Diskrepanzen zwischen Anspruch und Wirklichkeit [Ecology in everyday life. Inconsistencies between environmental attitudes and behavior]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 44, 226-251.
17. Diekmann, A., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Umweltbewußtsein und Umweltverhalten in Low- und High-Cost-Situationen. Eine empirische Überprüfung der Low-Cost-Hypothese [Environmental consciousness and environmental behavior in low-cost and in high-cost situations An empirical examination of the low-cost hypothesis]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 438-453.
18. Dugan, L., LaFree, G.S., & Piquero, A.R. (2005). Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Criminology, 43, 1031-1065.
19. Eifler, S. (1998). Machen Gelegenheiten Raucher? Theoretische und empirische Analysen der Beziehungen zwischen Self-Control, Ressourcen und dem Genuß von Tabakwaren [Do opportunities make smokers? Theoretical and empirical analyses of self-control, opportunities and tobacco smoking]. Soziale Probleme, 9, 90-116.
20. Eifler, S. (1999). Routineaktivitäten und Gelegenheiten. Eine quasi-experimentelle Untersuchung situativer Einflüsse auf deviantes Verhalten [Routine activities and opportunities. An experimental analysis of situational influences on deviance]. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
21. Eifler, S. (2000). Zu einer empirisch begründeten Taxonomie von Gelegenheiten [Toward an empirically founded taxonomy of opportunities]. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
22. Eifler, S. (2002). Finders are keepers-Empirical examinations of criminal opportunities using scenario techniques. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
23. Eifler, S. (2007). Evaluating the validity of self-reported deviant behavior using vignette analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41, 303-318.
24. Eifler, S., Schmitt, S., Bentrup, C., Hegeler, M., Pessara, I., Porr, C.,et al.(2001). Gelegenheitsstrukturen und Kriminalität [Opportunities and crime]. Bielefeld, Germany: Universität Bielefeld.
25. Farrington, D.P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behavior from childhood: The key findings from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 1-36.
26. Fetchenhauer, D., & Simon, J. (1998). Eine experimentelle Überprüfung der General Theory of Crime von Gottfredson und Hirschi [An experimental analyis of Gottfredson and Hirschi's general theory of crime]. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform, 81, 301-315.
27. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior. An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
28. Glaser, D. (1971). Social deviance. Chicago: Markham.
29. Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Grasmick, H.G., Tittle, C.R., Bursik, R.J., Jr., & Arneklev, B.J. (1993). Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfresdson and Hirschi's general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 5-29.
31. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley.
32. Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M.R. (1993). Commentary: Testing the general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 47-54.
33. Hope, T.L., & Chapple, C.L. (2005). Maternal characteristics, parenting, and adolescent sexual behavior: The role of self-control. Deviant Behavior 26, 25-45.
34. Jacobs, B. (1996). Crack dealers and restrictive deterrence: Identifying NARCS. Criminology, 34, 409-431.
35. Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). Lisrel 8. User's reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
36. Kliemt, H. (1986). The veil of insignificance. European Journal of Political Economy, 2, 333-344.
37. Kühnel, S., & Bamberg, S. (1998). Ist die Low-Cost Hypothese noch zu retten? Erwiderung auf Diekmann und Preisendörfer [Is the low-cost hypothesis still alive? A reply to Diekmann and Preisendörfer]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 27, 273-275.
38. LaFree, G., & Birkbeck, C. (1991). The neglected situation: A cross-national study of the situational characteristics of crime. Criminology, 29, 73-98.
39. Lamnek, S. (1994). Neue Theorien abweichenden Verhaltens [Developments in criminological theory]. München, Germany: Fink.
40. Longshore, D. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity: A prospective test of the general theory of crime. Social Problems, 45, 102-113.
41. Longshore, D., & Turner, S. (1998). Self-control and criminal opportunity. Cross-sectional test of the general theory of crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 25, 81-98.
42. Longshore, D., Turner, S., & Stein, J.A. (1996). Self-control in a criminal sample: An examination of construct validity. Criminology, 34, 209-228.
43. Magnusson, D. (1978). On the role of situations in personality research: An international perspective. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Current controversies and issues in personality (pp. 155-178). New York: John Wiley.
44. Magnusson, D., & Ekehammar, B. (1978). Similar situations-Similar behaviors? A study of the intraindividual congruence between situation perception and situation reactions. Journal of Research in Personality, 12, 41-48.
45. Magnusson, D., & Stattin, H. (1981). Stability of cross-situational patterns of behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 15, 488-496.
46. Nagin, D.S., & Paternoster, R. (1993). Enduring individual differences and rational choice theories of crime. Law and Society Review, 27, 467-498.
47. Piquero, A.R., & Rosay, A.B. (1998). The reliability and validity of Grasmick et al.'s self-control scale: A comment on Longshore et al. Criminology, 36, 157-73.
48. Piquero, A.R., & Tibbetts, S.G. (1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effect of low self-control and situational factor in offenders decision making: Toward a more complete model of rational offending. Justice Quarterly, 13, 481-510.
49. Preisendörfer, P. (1999). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 1996. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage [Environmental consciousness in Germany in 1996. Results from an representative study]. Bonn, Germany: Bundesumweltministerium.
50. Reed, G.E., & Yeager, P.C. (1996). Organizational offending and neoclassical criminology: Challenging the reach of a general theory of crime. Criminology, 34, 357-382.
51. Rossi, P.H., & Anderson, A.B. (1982). The factorial survey approach. An introduction. In P. H. Rossi & S. L. Nock (Eds.), Measuring social judgements (pp. 15-67). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52. Savage, L.J. (1954). The foundation of statistics. New York: John Wiley.
53. Seipel, C. (1999a). Die Bedeutung von Gelegenheitsstrukturen in der General Theory of Crime von Michael R. Gottfredson & Travis Hirschi (1990) [The relevance of opportunity in the general theory of crime of Michael R. Gottfredson and Travis Hirschi (1990)]. Soziale Probleme, 10, 144-165.
54. Seipel, C. (1999b). Strategien und Probleme des empirischen Theorienvergleichs in den Sozialwissenschaften. Rational Choice Theorie oder Persönlichkeitstheorie? [Strategies and problems within an empirical comparison of theories]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
55. Seipel, C. (2000). Ein empirischer Vergleich zwischen der Theorie geplanten Verhaltens von Icek Ajzen und der Allgemeinen Theorie der Kriminalität von Michael R. Gottfredson und Travis Hirschi [An empirical comparison of the theory of planned behavior of Icek Ajzen and the general theory of crime of Michael R Gottfrdson and Travis Hirschi]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 29, 399-412.
56. Simon, H.A. (1957). Models of man. New York: John Wiley.
57. Simpson, S.S., Piquero, N.L., & Paternoster, R. (1998). Exploring the micro-macro link in corporate crime research. In P. Bamberger & W. J. Sonnenstuhl (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 35-68). Stamford, CO: JAI Press.
58. Statistisches Bundesamt [Federal Statistical Office]. (Ed.). (2001). Datenreport 1999 [Data report 1999]. Bonn, Germany: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
59. Tibbetts, S.G., & Myers, D.L. (1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23, 179-200.
60. Tittle, C.R., & Botchkovar, E.V. (2005). Self-control, criminal motivation and deterrence: An investigation using Russian respondents. Criminology, 43, 307-354.
61. Vazsonyi, A.T. (2003). Parent-adolescent relations and problem behaviors: Hungary, the Netherlands, Switzerland, and the United States. Marriage & Family Review, 35, 161-187.
62. Vowell, P.R., & Chen, J. (2004). Predicting academic misconduct: A comparative test of four sociological explanations. Sociological Inquiry, 74, 226-249.
63. Wright, R.T., & Decker, S.H. (1994). Burglars on the job. Streetlife and residential breakins. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
64. Wright, R.T., & Decker, S.H. (1997). Armed robbers in action. Stickups and street culture. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
65. Yeager, P.C., & Reed, G.E. (1998). Of corporate persons and straw men: A reply to Herbert, Green, and Larragoite. Criminology, 36, 885-897.
66. Zintl, R. (1989). Der Homo Oeconomicus: Ausnahmeerscheinung in jeder Situation oder Jedermann in Ausnahmesituationen? [Economic man: An exception in each situation or everybody in exceptional situations?]. Analyse und Kritik, 11, 52-69.