Developing mathematics understanding and abstraction: The case of equivalence in the elementary years

Mathematics Education Research Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 76-95

  Warren, Elizabeth ^a   Cooper, Tom J ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77649278120     PISSN: 10332170     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03217546     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aczel, J. (1998). Learning algebraic strategies using a computerised balance model. In A. Oliver & K. Newstead (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp.1-16). Stellenbosch, South Africa: University of Stellenbosch.
2. Baroody, A. J., & Ginsburg, H. P. (1983). The effects of instruction on children's understanding of the equals sign. Elementary School Journal, 84, 199-212.
3. Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equals sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-18.
4. Bruner J. S., (1966). Towards a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
5. Carpenter, T., Franke, M., & Levi, L. (2003). Thinking mathematically: Integrating arithmetic and algebra in elementary school. Portsmouth NH: Heinemann.
6. Clements, D., (2007). Curriculum research: Towards a framework for a research based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30, 35-70.
7. Cooper, T. J., & Warren, E. (2008). The effect of different representations on years 3 to 5 students' ability to generalise. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik, 40(1), 23-37.
8. Davydov, V. V. (1975). The psychological characteristics of the "prenumeral" period of mathematics instruction. In L. P. Steffe (Ed.), Children's capacity for learning mathematics (Vol VII, pp. 109-205). Chicago: University of Chicago.
9. Dienes, Z. P. (1961). On abstraction and generalisation. Boston: Harvard University Press.
10. Dougherty, B., & Zilliox, J. (2003). Voyaging from theory and practice in teaching and learning: A view from Hawaii. In Pateman, N., Dougherty, B., & Zilliox, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol.1, pp. 31-46). Hawaii: University of Hawaii.
11. Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking processes. In D. Tall (Ed.) Advanced mathematical thinking (pp.25-41). Dordtrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
12. Duval, R. (1999). Representations, vision and visualization: Cognitive functions in mathematical thinking. Basic issues for learning. In F. Hitt & M. Santos (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st conference of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 3-26) Publisher.
13. English, L, & Halford, G. (1995). Mathematics education: Models and processes. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. English, L. D., & Sharry, P. (1996). Analogical reasoning and the development of algebraic abstraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 135-157.
15. Filloy, E., & Sutherland, R. (1996). Designing curricula for teaching and learning algebra. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 139-160). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
16. Fuji, T. (2003). Probing students' understanding of variables through cognitive conflict: Is the concept of a variable so difficult for students to understand? In N. Pateman, G. Dougherty & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 47-65). Hawaii: University of Hawaii.
17. Fujii, T., & Stephens, M. (2001). Fostering understanding of algebraic generalisation through numerical expressions: The role of the quasi-variables. In H. Chick, K. Stacey, J. Vincent, & J.Vincent (Eds.), The future of the teaching and learning of algebra. Proceedings of the 12th ICMI study conference (Vol. 1, pp. 258-64). Melbourne:
18. Gentner, D., & Markman, A. B. (1994). Structural alignment in comparison: No difference without similarity. Psychological Science, 5(3), 152-158.
19. Halford, G. S. (1993). Children's understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
20. Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and teaching with understanding. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 65-97). New York: MacMillan.
21. Kaput, J. (2006). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5-17). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Kieran, K., & Chalouh, L. (1992). Prealgebra: The transition from arithmetic to algebra. In T. D. Owens (Ed.), Research ideas for the classroom: Middle grades mathematics (pp. 179-198). New York: Macmillan.
23. Linchevski, L. (1995). Algebra with number and arithmetics with letters: A definition of pre-algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 14, 69-85.
24. Linchevski, L., & Herscovics, N. (1996). Crossing the cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra: Operating on equations in the context of equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 30, 36-65.
25. Malara, N., & Navarra, G. (2003). ArAl Project: Arithmetic pathways towards favouring pre-algebraic thinking. Bologana, Italy: Pitagora Editrice.
26. Mason, J. (2006). Making use of children's powers to produce algebraic thinking. In J.Kaput, D. Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 57-94). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Nisbet, S., & Warren, E. (2000). Primary school teachers' beliefs relating to teaching and assessing mathematics and factors that influence these beliefs. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 2, 34-47.
28. Pirie, S. E. B., & Martin, L. (1997). The equation, the whole equation, and nothing but the equation! One approach to the teaching of linear equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34, 159-181.
29. Queensland Study Authority. (2004). Mathematics Years 1-10 syllabus. Brisbane: Author: Retrieved 10 May 2009 www.qsa.qld.edu.au
30. Radford, L. (2003). Gestures, speech, and the sprouting of signs: A semiotic-cultural approach to students' types of generalisation. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5, 37-70.
31. Radford, L. (2006). Algebraic thinking and the generalisation of patterns: A semiotic perspective. Paper presented at the North America Chapter of 28th annual meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Merida, Mexico.
32. Saenz-Ludlow, A., & Walgamuth, C. (1998). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 35, 153-187.
33. Scandura, J. M. (1971). Mathematics: Concrete behavioural foundations. New York: Harper & Row.
34. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
35. Skemp, R. (1978). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Arithmetic Teacher, 26(3), 9-15.
36. Smith, E. (2006). Representational thinking as a framework for introducing functions in the elementary curriculum. In J. Kaput, D., Carraher, & M. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 133-160). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37. Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267-306). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Steinberg, R., Sleeman, D. & Ktorza, D. (1991). Algebra students' knowledge of equivalence of equations. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 112-121.
39. Tall D. (2004). Thinking through the three worlds of mathematics. In M. Hoines & A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th conference of the International group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, (Vol. 4, pp. 281-288). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
40. Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. Coxford & A. P. Schulte (Eds.), Ideas of algebra, K-12 (pp. 8-19). Reston: NCTM.
41. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M. (2008). Realistic Mathematics Education as work in progress. Retrieved 7th May 2008 from http://www.fi.uu.nl/publicaties/literatuur/4966.pdf
42. Warren E. (2006). Learning comparative mathematical language in the elementary school: A longitudinal study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 62, 169-189.
43. Warren, E., (2008, May). Early algebraic thinking: The case of equivalence in an early algebraic context. Keynote address to the conference on Future Curricular Trends in School Algebra and Geometry. The University of Chicago and The Field Museum, Chicago IL.
44. Warren, E., & Cooper T. (2005). Young children's ability to use the balance strategy to solve for unknowns. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17(1), 58-72.
45. Warren, E., & Cooper T. J. (2008). Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds' thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67, 171-185.