Impact of flowfield design on solid oxide fuel cell performance

ECS Transactions

Volumn 25, Issue 2 PART 1, 2009, Pages 815-824

  Kornely, M ^a   Leonide, A ^a   Weber, A ^a   Ivers Tiffee E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANODE SUPPORTED CELL; CELL PERFORMANCE; CURRENT DENSITY DISTRIBUTION; ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; ELECTRICAL POTENTIAL; ELECTRODE MATERIAL; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; FEM MODELS; FLOW-FIELD DESIGN; IN-PLANE; INTERCONNECTORS; MODELING DATA; OHMIC LOSS; PERFORMANCE DATA; POWER-LOSSES; RIB GEOMETRY; SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS; SOLID OXIDE;

ANODES; CATHODES; CONTACT RESISTANCE; DESIGN; DIRECT METHANOL FUEL CELLS (DMFC); ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLOW FIELDS; NICKEL OXIDE;

SOLID OXIDE FUEL CELLS (SOFC);

EID: 77649247702     PISSN: 19385862     EISSN: 19386737     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1149/1.3205600     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. F. Tietz et al., J. Power Sources 156, 20 (2006).
2. Ludger Blum et al., ECS Proc. Vol. 1. (SOFC IX), p. 29 (2005).
3. M. C. Tucker et al., J. Power Sources 160, 130 (2006).
4. J. I. Gazzarri, O. Kesler, J. Power Sources 176, 138 (2008).
5. C. W. Tanner, A. V. Virkar, J. Power Sources 113, 44 (2003).
6. G. J. Neson, C. L. Haynes, J. Power Sources 185, 1168 (2008).
7. H. Schichlein et al., J. Appl. Electrochem., 32, 875 (2002).
8. A. Leonide et al., J. Electrochem. Soc. 155, p. B36 (2008).
9. J. R. Ferguson et al., J. Power Sources 58, 109 (1996).
10. nd European SOFC Forum, p. 221 (1996).
11. A. Mai et al., Solid State Ionics, 176, 1342 (2005).
12. A. Weber, et al., ECS Proc. (SOFC-VII), p. 952 (2001).
13. J. Kim et. al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 146 (1), 69 (1999).