The negative consequences of other students' drinking: Inventory development and assessment of differences by student characteristics and risk behaviors

International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 519-529

  Rhodes, Scott D ^a   McCoy, Thomas P ^a   Omli, Morrow R ^b   Cohen, Gail M ^a   Wagoner, Kimberly G ^a   DuRant, Robert H ^c   Vissman, Aaron T ^a   Wolfson, Mark ^a,d  

^a WAKE FOREST SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Wake Forest University ^*

^d WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

College; Consequences; Drinking; Measurement; Risk

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HIGH RISK BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

EID: 77649246361     PISSN: 03340139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/IJAMH.2009.21.4.519     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. O'Brien MC, McCoy TP, Champion H, Mitra A, Robbins A, Teuschlser H, et al. Single question about drunken-ness to detect college students at risk for injury. Acad Emerg Med 2006; 13(6):629-36.
2. Wechsler H, Wuethrich B. Dying to drink: Confronting binge drinking on college campuses New York, NY: Rodale, 2002.
3. National Institutes of Health. A call to action: Changing the culture of drinking at U.S. colleges. Bethesda, MD: US Dept Health Hum Serv, 2002.
4. Kolbe LJ, Kann L, Collins JL. Overview of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Public Health Rep 1993;108(Suppl 1):2-10.
5. Wechsler H, Davenport A, Dowdall G, Moeykens B, Castillo S. Health and behavioral consequences of binge drinking in college. A national survey of students at 140 campuses. JAMA 1994;272(21):1672-7.
6. Presley CA, Meilman PW, Lyerla R. Development of the Core Alcohol and Drug Survey: initial findings and future directions. J Am Coll Health 1994;42(6):248-55.
7. Rhodes SD, Hergenrather KC. Attitudes and beliefs about hepatitis B vaccination among men who have sex with men: The Birmingham Measurement Study. J Homosex 2008;55(1):124-149.
8. DeJong W. Definitions of binge drinking. JAMA 2003;289(13):1635.
9. rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1994.
10. Co mrey AL. Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. J Consult Clin Psychol 1988;56:754-61.
11. Jackson DN. The dynamics of structures and personality tests. Psychol Rev 1971;78:229-48.
12. Rhodes SD, Bowie DA, Hergenrather KC. Collecting behavioural data using the world wide web: considerations for researchers. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57(1):68-73.
13. Bollen KA. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York, NY: Wiley, 1989.
14. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. NY: Guilford Press, 1998.
15. Maru yama GM. Basics of structural equation modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
16. th ed. Needham Heights: MA: Allyn Bacon, 2001:653-771.
17. Hu R, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 1999;6(1):1-55.
18. Marshall GN, Morales LS, Elliott M, Spritzer K, Hays RD. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) 1.0 Core Survey. Psychol Assess 2001;13(2):216-29.
19. Jore skog KG. Testing structural equation models. In: Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park: CA: Sage, 1993:294-316.
20. Wolfin ger R, O'Connell M. Generalized linear mixed models: A pseudo-likelihood approach. J Stat Comput Simulat 1993;48:233-43.
21. Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Internal estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 2001;16(2):101-33.
22. Loevinger J. The attenuation paradox in test theory. Psychol Bull 1954;51:493-504.
23. Wechsler H, Moeykens B, Davenport A, Castillo S, Hansen J. The adverse impact of heavy episodic drinkers on other college students. J Stud Alcohol 1995;56(6):628-34.
24. Fish bein M, Pequegnat W. Evaluating AIDS prevention interventions using behavioral and biological outcome measures. Sex Transm Dis 2000;27(2):101-10.