Influence of the length of the loading period after placement of orthodontic mini-implants on changes in bone histomorphology: Microcomputed tomographic and histologic analysis

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 842-849

  Cha, Jung Yul ^a   Lim, Joong Ki ^b   Song, Jin Wook ^a   Sato, Daisuke ^c   Kenmotsu, Makoto ^c   Inoue, Takashi ^c   Park, Young Chel ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Dentistry   (South Korea)

^b Tokyo Dental College ^*  (South Korea)

^c TOKYO DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Histomorphometry; Microcomputed tomography; Mini implant

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; BONE REGENERATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOG; IMAGE PROCESSING; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MANDIBLE; MECHANICAL STRESS; METHODOLOGY; MICRO-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; ORTHODONTICS; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE DENSITY; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DOGS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; ORTHODONTIC ANCHORAGE PROCEDURES; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN; OSSEOINTEGRATION; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TIME FACTORS; X-RAY MICROTOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 77649227396     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 2000; 3: 23-28.
2. Costa A, Raffainl M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: A preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1998; 13: 201-209.
3. Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P, Glatzmaier J. The use of palatal implants for orthodontic anchorage. Design and clinical application of the Orthosystem. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 410-416.
4. Park HS, Kwon TG. Sliding mechanics with microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 703-710.
5. Wilmes B, Rademacher C, Olthoff G, Drescher D. Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. J Orofac Orthop 2006; 67: 162-174.
6. Rebaudi A, Koller B, Laib A, Trisi P. Microcomputed tomographic analysis of the peri-implant bone. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 316-325.
7. Romanos GE, Testori T, Degidi M, Piattelli A. Histologic and histomorphometric findings from retrieved, immediately occlusally loaded implants in humans. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 1823-1832.
8. Roberts WE. Bone tissue interface. J Dent Educ 1988; 52: 804-809.
9. Graichen H, Lochmuller EM, Wolf E, et al. A non-destructive technique for 3-D microstructural phenotypic characterisation of bones in genetically altered mice: Preliminary data in growth hormone transgenic animals and normal controls. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1999; 199: 239-248.
10. Park YS, Yi KY, Lee IS, Jung YC. Correlation between microtomography and histomorphometry for assessment of implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 156-160.
11. Stoppie N, van der Waerden JP, Jansen JA, Duyck J, Wevers M, Naert IE. Validation of microfocus computed tomography in the evaluation of bone implant specimens. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7: 87-94.
12. Van Oossterwyck H, Duyck J, Vander Sloten J, et al. Use of microfocus computerized tomography as a new technique for characterizing bone tissue around oral implants. J Oral Implantol 2000; 26: 5-12.
13. Kiba H, Hayakawa T, Oba S, Kuwabara M, Habata I, Yamamoto H. Potential application of high-resolution microfocus X-ray techniques for observation of bone structure and boneimplant interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 279-285.
14. Muller R, Van Campenhout H, Van Damme B, et al. Morphometric analysis of human bone biopsies: A quantitative structural comparison of histological sections and micro-computed tomography. Bone 1998; 23: 59-66.
15. De Smet E, Jaecques SV, Wevers M, et al. Effect of controlled early implant loading on bone healing and bone mass in guinea pigs, as assessed by micro-CT and histology. Eur J Oral Sci 2006; 114: 232-242.
16. Bernhardt R, van den Dolder J, Bierbaum S, et al. Osteoconductive modifications of Ti-implants in a goat defect model: Characterization of bone growth with SR muCT and histology. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 3009-3019.
17. Kuroda S, Virdi AS, Li P, Healy KE, Sumner DR. A low-temperature biomimetic calcium phosphate surface enhances early implant fixation in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 70: 66-73.
18. Kerawala CJ, Martin IC, Allan W, Williams ED. The effects of operator technique and bur design on temperature during osseous preparation for osteosynthesis self-tapping screws. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999; 88: 145-150.
19. Sowden D, Schmitz JP. AO self-drilling and self-tapping screws in rat calvarial bone: An ultrastructural study of the implant interface. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 294-299.
20. Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Kanomi R, Hartsfield JK, Roberts WE, Garetto LP. The use of small titanium screws for orthodontic anchorage. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 377-381.
21. Cornelis MA, Scheffler NR, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JFC, Behets CN. Systematic review of the experimental use of temporary skeletal anchorage devices in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: S52-S58.
22. Park H. Histologic and biomechanical characteristics of orthodontic self-drilling and self-tapping microscrew implants. Korea J Orthod 2006; 36: 16-29.
23. Bernhardt R, Scharnweber D, Muller B, et al. Comparison of microfocus-and synchrotron X-ray tomography for the analysis of osteointegration around Ti6Al4V implants. Eur Cell Mater 2004; 7: 42-51.
24. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith RS. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984; 86: 95-111.
25. Freire JN, Silva NR, Gil JN, Magini RS, Coelho PG. Histomorphologic and histomophometric evaluation of immediately and early loaded mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131: 704.e1-e9.
26. Buchter A, Joos U, Wiesmann HP, Seper L, Meyer U. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of interface reaction at conical screw-type implants. Head Face Med 2006; 2: 5.
27. Branemark R, Ohrnell L-O, Nilsson P, Thomsen P. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration during healing: An experimental in vivo study in the rat. Biomaterials 1997; 18: 969-978.
28. Burr DB, Turner CH, Naick P, et al. Does microdamage accumulation affect the mechanical properties of bone? J Biomech 1998; 31: 337-345.
29. Huja SS, Katona TR, Burr DB, Garetto LP, Roberts WE. Microdamage adjacent to endosseous implants. Bone 1999; 25: 217-222.
30. Burr D. Microdamage and bone strength. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14: S67-S72.
31. Garetto LP, Chen J, Parr JA, Roberts WE. Remodeling dynamics of bone supporting rigidly fixed titanium implants: A histomorphometric comparison in four species including humans. Implant Dent 1995; 4: 235-243.
32. De Genova DC, McInnes-Ledoux P, Weinberg R, Shaye R. Force degradation of orthodontic elastomeric chains-A product comparison study. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 377-384.
33. Kim K-H, Chung C-H, Choy K, Lee J-S, Vanarsdall RL. Effects of prestretching on force degradation of synthetic elastomeric chains. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128: 477-482.
34. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 373-378.
35. Chen Y, Shin H-I, Kyung H-M. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133: 44-50.
36. Heidemann W, Gerlach KL, Grobel KH, Kollner HG. Influence of different pilot hole sizes on torque measurements and pullout analysis of osteosynthesis screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1998; 26: 50-55.
37. Brown GA, McCarthy T, Bourgeault CA, Callahan DJ. Mechanical performance of standard and cannulated 4.0-mm cancellous bone screws. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 307-312.