Parameters affecting primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants;Einfluss der Insertionsparameter auf die Primärstabilität orthodontischer Mini-Implantate

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 162-174

  Wilmes, Benedict ^a   Rademacher, Carsten ^a   Olthoff, Gudrun ^a   Drescher, Dieter ^a  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Implant fracture; Mini implants; Orthodontic anchorage; Primary stability

Indexed keywords

RESIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE SCREW; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISSECTION; DRILL; EMBEDDING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FRACTURE; ILIAC BONE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MICROCOMPUTER; NONHUMAN; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PELVIC GIRDLE; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SWINE; THICKNESS; TISSUE SECTION; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; BONE NAILS; BONE SCREWS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; MICROCOMPUTERS; MINIATURIZATION; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; ROBOTICS; SOFTWARE; SUTURE ANCHORS; SWINE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH MOVEMENT; TORQUE;

EID: 33744458766     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-006-0611-z     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416.
2. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, et al. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
3. Berens A, Wiechmann D, Rüdiger J, Skeletal anchorage in orthodontics with mini- and microsrews. Int Orthod 2005;3:325-43.
4. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, et al. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:100-6.
5. Costa A, Raffaini M, Melsen B. Miniscrews as orthodontic anchorage: A preliminary report. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1998;13: 201-9.
6. Da Cunha HA, Francischone CE, Filho HN, et al. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency in the assessment of primary stability and final torque capacity of standard and TiUnite single-tooth im-plants under immediate loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:578-85.
7. Dhert WJ, Verheyen CC, Braak LH, et al. A finite element analysis of the push-out test: Influence of test conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:119-30.
8. Diedrich P. Kieferorthopädische Behandlung Erwachsener. In: Diedrich P (Hrsg.). Praxis der Zahnheilkunde. Kieferorthopädie III. München-Jena: Urban & Fischer, 2000:174-208.
9. Freudenthaler JW, Haas R, Bantleon HP. Bicortical titanium screws for critical orthodontic anchorage in the mandible: A preliminary report on clinical applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:358-63.
10. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Meredith N, et al. A comparison between cutting torque and resonance frequency measurements of maxillary implants. A 20-month clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999;28:297-303.
11. Friberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, et al. Evaluation of bone density using cutting resistance measurements and microradiography: An in vitro study in pig ribs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6:164-71.
12. Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage - preliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:410-8.
13. Glauser R, Meredith N. Diagnostische Möglichkeiten zur Evaluation der Implantatstabilität. Implantologie 2001;9:147-160.
14. Heibel H, Alt KW, Wachter R, et al. Cortical thickness of the mandible with special reference to miniplate osteosynthesis. Morphometric analysis of autopsy material. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2001;5:180-5.
15. Homolka P, Beer A, Birkfellner W, et al. Bone mineral density measurement with dental quantitative CT prior to dental implant placement in cadaver mandibles: Pilot study. Radiology 2002;224:247-52.
16. Ikumi N, Tsutsumi S. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:253-60.
17. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:763-7.
18. Melsen B, Costa A. Immediate loading of implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clin Orthod Res 2000;3:23-8.
19. Meredith N, Alleyne D, Cawley P. Quantitative determination of the stability of the implant-tissue interface using resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:261-7.
20. Meredith N. A review of nondestructive test methods and their application to measure the stability and osseointegration of bone anchored endosseous implants. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1998;26:275-91.
21. Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:491-501.
22. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, et al. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124: 373-8.
23. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: A human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92.
24. Ottoni JM, Oliveira ZF, Mansini R, et al. Correlation between placement torque and survival of single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:769-76.
25. Roberts WE, Smith RK, Zilberman Y, et al. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 1984;86:95-111.
26. Wehrbein H, Glatzmaier J, Mundwiller U, et al. The Orthosystem - a new implant system for orthodontic anchorage in the palate. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:142-53.