Sharing decision making about cardiac surgery improving the quality of the decision to undergo or forego surgery

Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 519-521

  Montori, Victor M ^a   Ting, Henry H ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision support techniques; Decision making; Evidence based medicine; Heart valves; Surgery

Indexed keywords

AORTA VALVE DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPNEA; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURVIVAL; AORTA VALVE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; NOTE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; RISK;

AORTIC VALVE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; RISK;

EID: 77649211173     PISSN: 19417713     EISSN: 19417705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.912246     Document Type: Editorial

References (12)

1. Bach DS, Siao D, Girard SE, Duvernoy C, McCallister BD Jr, Gualano SK. Evaluation of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who do not undergo aortic valve replacement: The potential role of subjectively overestimated operative risk. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009;2: 533-539.
2. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: Revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651-661.
3. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ. 1999;319:766-771.
4. Hawley ST, Zikmund-Fisher B, Ubel P, Jancovic A, Lucas T, Fagerlin A. The impact of the format of graphical presentation on health-related knowledge and treatment choices. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73: 448-455.
5. Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E, Schwartz L, Woloshin S. Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2008;2:53-96.
6. Carling CL, Kristoffersen DT, Montori VM, Herrin J, Schunemann HJ, Treweek S, Akl EA, Oxman AD. The effect of alternative summary statistics for communicating risk reduction on decisions about taking statins: A randomized trial. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000134.
7. Levinson W, Kao A, Kuby A, Thisted RA. Not all patients want to participate in decision making. A national study of public preferences. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:531-535.
8. O'Connor AM, Bennett C, Stacey D, Barry MJ, Col NF, Eden KB, Entwistle V, Fiset V, Holmes-Rovner M, Khangura S, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Rovner DR. Do patient decision aids meet effectiveness criteria of the international patient decision aid standards collaboration? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:554-574.
9. Barratt A. Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: The challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;73:407-412.
10. Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Progress in evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2008;300:1814-1816.
11. Murad MH, Montori VM, Guyatt GH. Incorporating patient preferences in evidence-based medicine. JAMA. 2008;300:2483, author reply 2483-2484.
12. Spertus JA, Furman MI. Translating evidence into practice: Are we neglecting the neediest? Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:987-988.