Incorporating patient preferences in evidence-based medicine

JAMA

Volumn 300, Issue 21, 2008, Pages 2483-

  Murad, M Hassan ^a   Montori, Victor M ^a   Guyatt, Gordon H ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; LETTER; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NOTE; PATIENT SATISFACTION;

EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 57349147676     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2008.730     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Krahn M, Naglie G. The next step in guideline development: incorporating patient preferences. JAMA. 2008;300(4):436-438.
2. Hayward RS, Wilson MC, Tunis SR, Bass EB, Guyatt GH; Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Users' guides to the medical literature: VIII, How to use clinical practice guidelines: A, are the recommendations valid? JAMA. 1995;274(7):570-574.
3. Guyatt G, Sinclair J, Cook D, Glasziou P. Users' guides to the medical literature: XVI, How to use a treatment recommendation. JAMA. 1999;281(19):1836-1843.
4. Guyatt GH, Haynes RB, Jaeschke RZ, et al; Evidence Based Medicine Working Group. Users' guides to the medical literature: XXV, Evidence-based medicine: principles for applying the Users' Guides to patient care. JAMA. 2000;284(10):1290-1296.
5. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al; GRADE Working Group. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926.