Time lag characterization of two continuous glucose monitoring systems

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 348-353

  Garg, Satish K ^a,b,c   Voelmle, Mary ^a   Gottlieb, Peter A ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c Children's Hospital Colorado   (United States)

Author keywords

Blood glucose; Continuous glucose monitoring; Interstitial glucose; Time lag

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BOOTSTRAPPING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTINUOUS PROCESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PROCESS DESIGN; SAFETY; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTEM ANALYSIS; TIME;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HUMANS; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77649182178     PISSN: 01688227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2009.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Kulcu E. Physiological differences between interstitial glucose and blood glucose measured in human subjects. Diabetes Care 26 8 (2003) 2405-2409
2. Kovatchev B.P., Shields D., and Breton M. Graphical and numerical evaluation of continuous glucose sensing time lag. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 11 3 (2008) 1-5
3. Mazze R. Evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and clinical applicability of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM): is CGM ready for real time?. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 1 (2009) 11-18
4. Stout P.J., Racchini J.R., and Hilgers M.E. A novel approach to mitigating the physiological lag between blood and interstitial fluid glucose measurements. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 6 (2004) 635-644
5. Stout P.J., Peled N., Erickson B.J., Hilgers M.E., Racchini J.R., and Hoegh T.B. Comparison of glucose levels in dermal interstitial fluid and finger capillary blood. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 3 (2001) 81-90
6. Wentholt I.M.E., Hart A.A.M., Hoekstra J.B.L., and DeVries J.H. Relationship between interstitial and blood glucose in type 1 diabetes patients: delay and the push-pull phenomenon revisited. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 9 (2004) 169-175
7. Cengiz E., and Tamborlane W.V. A tale of two compartments: interstitial versus blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 1 (2009) S11-S16
8. Kovatchev B.P., Clarke W.L., Breton M., Brayman K., and McCall A. Quantifying temporal glucose variability in diabetes via continous glucose monitoring: mathematical methods and clinical applications. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 7 (2005) 849-862
9. Garg S.K., Smith J., Beatson C., Lopez-Baca B., Voelmle M., and Gottlieb P.A. Diabetes Technol. Ther. 11 (2009) 65-72
10. Brauker J, Kamath A, Li Y, Zisser H, Schwartz S, et al. Time lag of a 7-day transcutaneous continuous glucose sensor compared to YSI blood glucose values poster presented at: the 67th Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association (June 2007), Chicago, IL.